Measuring Software Screen Complexity: Relating Eye Tracking, Emotional Valence, and Subjective Ratings

Enterprise software pages, routinely used to conduct a variety of business-relevant tasks, must be clear and nonconfusing to experienced end users. A study was conducted to consider the impact of several page design factors (background gradient, font, and font size) on perceived ratings of page clarity, completion time, emotional valence (EV) from video, and several eye-tracking parameters. Twenty professional managers each completed 25 tasks on enterprise web pages designed with specific combinations of these factors. Highly rated pages had Tahoma and Larger fonts, compared to Calibri and Smaller fonts. The Gradient background did not influence ratings but did increase the search area and completion time. Although EV was not a sensitive measure across tasks, it was influenced by font differences in the first few seconds of page presentation. Overall, the use of background gradient was not supported, but both Tahoma and Larger fonts were supported for these enterprise pages.

[1]  Richard L. Hazlett,et al.  Measuring emotional valence to understand the user's experience of software , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[2]  Rosalind W. Picard.  Emotion Research by the People, for the People , 2010 .

[3]  Rebecca J Woods,et al.  Effects of Typeface and Font Size on Legibility for Children , 2005 .

[4]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Coding, Analysis, Interpretation, and Recognition of Facial Expressions , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Guangfeng Song.  Analysis of Web Page Complexity Through Visual Segmentation , 2007, HCI.

[6]  Alexandre N. Tuch,et al.  The role of visual complexity and prototypicality regarding first impression of websites: Working towards understanding aesthetic judgments , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Yunfei Chen,et al.  Evaluating the visual quality of web pages using a computational aesthetic approach , 2011, WSDM '11.

[8]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols , 2000, ETRA.

[9]  Alexandre N. Tuch,et al.  The Role of Visual Complexity in Affective Reactions to Webpages: Subjective, Eye Movement, and Cardiovascular Responses , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[10]  Sean Bechhofer,et al.  Visual complexity and aesthetic perception of web pages , 2008, SIGDOC '08.

[11]  Sucheta Nadkarni,et al.  A Task-Based Model of Perceived Website Complexity , 2007, MIS Q..

[12]  D. Berlyne.  Conflict, arousal, and curiosity , 2014 .

[13]  Robert Stevens,et al.  Toward a definition of visual complexity as an implicit measure of cognitive load , 2009, TAP.

[14]  C. J. Huberty,et al.  Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. , 1989 .

[15]  P. Ekman,et al.  Facial action coding system: a technique for the measurement of facial movement , 1978 .

[16]  Martin Ebner,et al.  The XAOS Metric - Understanding Visual Complexity as Measure of Usability , 2010, USAB.

[17]  D. Donderi.  Visual complexity: a review. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[19]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Relating Perceived Web Page Complexity to Emotional Valence and Eye Movement Metrics , 2012 .

[20]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Web Home Page Complexity and Communication Effectiveness , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Matthieu Perreira Da Silva,et al.  Image complexity measure based on visual attention , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[22]  Chen Ling,et al.  Effect of Glance Duration on Perceived Complexity and Segmentation of User Interfaces , 2007, HCI.

[23]  Michael Bernard,et al.  A Comparison of Popular Online Fonts: Which Size and Type is Best? , 2002 .

[24]  Simon Hooper,et al.  Variables affecting the legibility of computer generated text , 1986 .

[25]  Ching Y. Suen,et al.  Evaluation of Fonts for Digital Publishing and Display , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition.

[26]  Alan Kennedy,et al.  Book Review: Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  Jakob de Lemos,et al.  Measuring emotions using eye tracking , 2008 .

[28]  Katharina Reinecke,et al.  Predicting users' first impressions of website aesthetics with a quantification of perceived visual complexity and colorfulness , 2013, CHI.