As activity-based approaches gain acceptance for travel demand analysis and forecasting in practice, the unit of analysis in transportation planning models needs to shift from a one-way trip to an activity schedule with associated trip chains. A spatial network assignment process and its application to an actual network are described; the process can be used in conjunction with activity-based travel demand forecasting procedures as well as for traffic operational studies. Two simulation-based dynamic spatial microassignment procedures for travel demand with activity trip chains are presented. The first represents a one-step simulation-assignment procedure in which assignment of trips is based on prevailing travel time. The second is an iterative simulation-assignment procedure in which a user equilibrium solution is obtained. The models are illustrated through various experiments conducted using an actual network (in Fort Worth, Texas) to examine network performance under different activity and trip-chaining scenarios. Different demand levels with different trip chain patterns are considered and compared for an actual transportation network. In addition, a case is made for dynamic microassignment of activity trip chains by contrasting it with current practice and illustrating the pitfalls of inappropriately recognizing trip chains using current-practice assignment. In particular, two different procedures are considered and compared for selected test scenarios with the dynamic assignment models presented. The first procedure corresponds to the case in which the activity and trip-chaining behavior is completely ignored, and only the final destination in the chain is considered. The second procedure treats the links of the chains separately as independent trips, without appropriate linkage between them.
[1]
W. W,et al.
A MODEL OF COMPLEX TRAVEL BEHAVIOR: PART II-AN OPERATIONAL MODEL
,
2002
.
[2]
J. Wardrop.
ROAD PAPER. SOME THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF ROAD TRAFFIC RESEARCH.
,
1952
.
[3]
Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.
ACTIVITY-BASED TRAVEL FORECASTING
,
1997
.
[4]
E I Pas,et al.
RECENT ADVANCES IN ACTIVITY-BASED TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING
,
1997
.
[5]
Dick Ettema,et al.
A SIMULATION MODEL OF ACTIVITY SCHEDULING BEHAVIOUR
,
1992
.
[6]
Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.
Dynamic Traffic Assignment and Simulation Procedures for ADIS/ATMS Applications: Technical Documentation
,
1993
.
[7]
Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.
System optimal and user equilibrium time-dependent traffic assignment in congested networks
,
1995,
Ann. Oper. Res..
[8]
J. G. Wardrop,et al.
Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research
,
1952
.
[9]
K G Goulias.
ACTIVITY-BASED TRAVEL FORECASTING: WHAT ARE SOME ISSUES?
,
1997
.
[10]
Athanasios K. Ziliaskopoulos,et al.
Optimum path algorithms on multidimensional networks: Analysis, design, implementation and computational experience.
,
1996
.
[11]
T. Koopmans,et al.
Studies in the Economics of Transportation.
,
1956
.
[12]
Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.
Integrated arterial and freeway operation control strategies for IVHS advanced traffic management systems. Summary report, September 1997--January 1998
,
1998
.
[13]
C. B. Mcguire,et al.
Studies in the Economics of Transportation
,
1958
.
[14]
W.W. Recker,et al.
A MODEL OF COMPLEX TRAVEL BEHAVIOR: PART I. THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENT
,
1985
.