Setting priorities in injury prevention: the application of an incidence based cost model

Objectives: To make detailed calculations on the direct medical costs of injuries in the Netherlands to support priority setting in prevention. Methods: A computerised, incidence based model for cost calculations was developed and incidence figures derived from the Dutch Injury Surveillance System (LIS) which provides national estimates of the annual number of patients treated at an emergency department. A comprehensive set of cost elements (that is, health care segments) was obtained from health care registrations and a LIS patient survey. Patients were assigned to specific groups based on LIS characteristics (for example, age, injury type). Average costs per patient group were calculated for each cost element and total costs estimated by adding costs for all patient groups. Results: The direct costs of injury average 2000 guilders per injury patient attending an emergency department. Home and leisure injuries account for over half of the costs, although cost per patient is highest for motor vehicle injuries. Injuries to the lower extremities account for almost half of the total costs and are incurred mainly in the home or recreation. Motor vehicle crashes are the major cause of head injuries. Conclusions: The model permits continuous and detailed monitoring of injury costs. Estimates can be compiled for any LIS patient group or injury subcategory. The results can be used to rank injuries for prioritisation of prevention by injury categories (for example, traffic, home, or leisure), or by specific scenarios (for example, fall at home).

[1]  D. Thompson,et al.  Effectiveness of bicycle safety helmets in preventing serious facial injury. , 1996, JAMA.

[2]  Ted R. Miller,et al.  Estimating the costs of non-fatal consumer product injuries in the United States , 2000 .

[3]  J. Mackenbach,et al.  Medical costs and economic production losses due to injuries in the Netherlands. , 1997, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  C N Smart,et al.  The incidence and economic costs of cancer, motor vehicle injuries, coronary heart disease, and stroke: a comparative analysis. , 1980, American journal of public health.

[5]  Willebrordus Hendricus Johannes Rogmans Injury cost-analysis and ethics: At what costs? , 1999 .

[6]  Bicyclist head injury prevention by helmets and mandatory wearing legislation in Victoria, Australia. , 1995 .

[7]  S. Thomas,et al.  Effectiveness of bicycle helmets in preventing head injury in children: case-control study , 1994, BMJ.

[8]  Saakje Mulder,et al.  New directions in injury surveillance: Development of a model for continuous monitoring of direct medical costs , 1999 .

[9]  F T McDermott,et al.  Bicyclist head injury prevention by helmets and mandatory wearing legislation in Victoria, Australia. , 1995, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[10]  Johan P. Mackenbach,et al.  The costs of injuries in the Netherlands , 1995 .

[11]  D. Thompson,et al.  Effectiveness of bicycle safety helmets in preventing head injuries. A case-control study. , 1996, JAMA.

[12]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases injuries and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. , 1996 .

[13]  S. M. Smith,et al.  Bicycle-associated head injuries and deaths in the United States from 1984 through 1988. How many are preventable? , 1991, JAMA.

[14]  Gordon S. Smith,et al.  COST OF INJURY IN THE UNITED STATES: A REPORT TO CONGRESS , 1989 .

[15]  Saakje Mulder,et al.  Epidemiological data and ranking home and leisure accidents for priority-setting. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.