Continuous ASL (CASL) perfusion MRI with an array coil and parallel imaging at 3T

The purpose of this work was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of using an array coil and parallel imaging in continuous arterial spin labeling (CASL) perfusion MRI. An 8‐channel receive‐only array head coil was used in conjunction with a surrounding detunable volume transmit coil. The signal to noise ratio (SNR), temporal stability, cerebral blood flow (CBF), and perfusion image coverage were measured from steady state CASL scans using: a standard volume coil, array coil, and array coil with 2‐ and 3‐fold accelerated parallel imaging. Compared to the standard volume coil, the array coil provided 3 times the average SNR increase and higher temporal stability for the perfusion weighted images, even with threefold acceleration. Although perfusion images of the array coil were affected by the inhomogeneous coil sensitivities, this effect was invisible in the quantitative CBF images, which showed highly reproducible perfusion values compared to the standard volume coil. The unfolding distortions of parallel imaging were suppressed in the perfusion images by pairwise subtraction, though they sharply degraded the raw EPI images. Moreover, parallel imaging provided the potential of acquiring more slices due to the shortened acquisition time and improved coverage in brain regions with high static field inhomogeneity. Such results highlight the potential utility of array coils and parallel imaging in ASL perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  P. Roemer,et al.  The NMR phased array , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  G. Glover,et al.  Physiological noise in oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design , 1999 .

[4]  Patrick J Ledden,et al.  Whole‐brain 3D perfusion MRI at 3.0 T using CASL with a separate labeling coil , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  T. Reese,et al.  Multislice perfusion and perfusion territory imaging in humans with separate label and image coils , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  J. Detre,et al.  Multisection cerebral blood flow MR imaging with continuous arterial spin labeling. , 1998, Radiology.

[8]  L. L. Wald,et al.  A Phased Array Echoplanar Imaging System for fMRI , 1998, NeuroImage.

[9]  E. C. Wong,et al.  Potential and Pitfalls of Arterial Spin Labeling Based Perfusion Imaging Techniques for MRI , 2000 .

[10]  Peter Kellman,et al.  Application of sensitivity‐encoded echo‐planar imaging for blood oxygen level‐dependent functional brain imaging † , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Christine Preibisch,et al.  Functional MRI using sensitivity-encoded echo planar imaging (SENSE-EPI) , 2003, NeuroImage.

[12]  J. Duyn,et al.  Design of a SENSE‐optimized high‐sensitivity MRI receive coil for brain imaging , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  M. Schnall,et al.  Comparison of quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  J. Detre,et al.  Reduced Transit-Time Sensitivity in Noninvasive Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Cerebral Blood Flow , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[15]  W P Dillon,et al.  High resolution T2‐weighted imaging of the human brain using surface coils and an analytical reception profile correction , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  Donald S. Williams,et al.  Perfusion imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.