In the present experiment, the effect on the marginal peri-implant tissues following repeated abutment removal and subsequent reconnection was studied. 5 beagle dogs were used. The mandibular premolars were extracted and 2 fixtures of the Brånemark System were installed, 1 in each mandibular quadrant. 3 months later, abutment connection was performed. A 6-month period of plaque control was initiated. Once a month during the plaque control period, the abutment of the right side (test) in each dog was disconnected, cleaned and reconnected to the failure. Thus, each test abutment was removed and reconnected altogether 5x during this period. The contralateral abutment remained undisturbed for 6 months and served as control. 1 month after the last reconnection, the animals were sacrificed and tissue samples, comprising the implant and the surrounding soft and hard peri-implant tissues, were obtained, decalcified, embedded in Epon and sectioned. The following landmarks were identified and used for linear measurements: PM (the marginal portion of the peri-implant mucosa), aJE (the level of the apical termination of the junctional epithelium), B (the marginal level of bone to implant contact), A/F (the abutment/fixture border). The findings indicate that the dis- and subsequent reconnections of the abutment component of the implant compromised the mucosal barrier and resulted in a more "apically" positioned zone of connective tissue. The additional marginal bone resorption observed at the test sites following abutment manipulation may be the result of tissue reactions initiated to establish a proper "biological width" of the mucosal-implant barrier.
[1]
P. Thomsen,et al.
Light and transmission electron microscopy used to study the tissue morphology close to implants.
,
1985,
Biomaterials.
[2]
P. Thomsen,et al.
The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth.
,
1991,
Clinical oral implants research.
[3]
J. Lindhe,et al.
Soft tissue reaction to de novo plaque formation on implants and teeth. An experimental study in the dog.
,
1992,
Clinical oral implants research.
[4]
J. Lindhe,et al.
Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited.
,
1996,
Journal of clinical periodontology.
[5]
J. Lindhe,et al.
Different types of inflammatory reactions in peri-implant soft tissues.
,
2005,
Journal of clinical periodontology.
[6]
J. Lindhe,et al.
The topography of the vascular systems in the periodontal and peri-implant tissues in the dog.
,
1994,
Journal of clinical periodontology.
[7]
J. Wennström,et al.
The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog.
,
1996,
Clinical oral implants research.
[8]
J. Fiorellini,et al.
Soft tissue reactions to non-submerged unloaded titanium implants in beagle dogs.
,
1992,
Journal of periodontology.
[9]
J. Lindhe,et al.
Long-standing plaque and gingivitis at implants and teeth in the dog.
,
1992,
Clinical oral implants research.