Comparison of cytotoxic T lymphocyte efficacy in acute and persistent lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection

Immune responses mediated by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) have often been found to be functionally impaired in persistent infections. It is assumed that this impairment contributes to persistence of the infection. In this study, we compare the killing efficacy of CD8+ T-cell responses in mice acutely and persistently infected with the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, using an in vivo CTL killing assay. To infer the killing efficacy of CTLs, we developed a new mathematical model describing the disappearance of peptide-pulsed cells from the blood of the mice over time. We estimate a lower half-life for peptide-pulsed cells in acute infection than in persistent infection, which indicates a higher killing efficacy of the CD8+ T-cell response in acute infection. However, by controlling for the different levels of CTLs in acutely and persistently infected mice, we find that CTLs in persistent infection are only two times less efficacious than CTLs in acute infections. These results strongly suggest that the in vivo cytotoxicity of CD8+ T-cell responses in persistent infection is modulated via the number of CTLs rather than their individual functionality.

[1]  Scott N. Mueller,et al.  Viral targeting of fibroblastic reticular cells contributes to immunosuppression and persistence during chronic infection , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Dominik Wodarz,et al.  Direct quantitation of rapid elimination of viral antigen‐positive lymphocytes by antiviral CD8+ T cells in vivo , 2000, European journal of immunology.

[3]  Sergei S. Pilyugin,et al.  Modeling immune responses with handling time , 2000, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[4]  A. Fauci,et al.  The challenge of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases , 2004, Nature.

[5]  E. Wherry,et al.  CD8 T cell dysfunction during chronic viral infection. , 2007, Current opinion in immunology.

[6]  V. V. Ganusov,et al.  Persistence of viral infection despite similar killing efficacy of antiviral CD8(+) T cells during acute and chronic phases of infection. , 2010, Virology.

[7]  D. Moskophidis,et al.  Critical Role for Perforin-, Fas/FasL-, and TNFR1-Mediated Cytotoxic Pathways in Down-Regulation of Antigen-Specific T Cells during Persistent Viral Infection , 2002, Journal of Virology.

[8]  J. Harty,et al.  CD8+ T cell effector mechanisms in resistance to infection. , 2000, Annual review of immunology.

[9]  M. Salmon,et al.  EBV-Specific CD8+ T Cell Memory: Relationships Between Epitope Specificity, Cell Phenotype, and Immediate Effector Function1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[10]  Graeme E Price,et al.  Differential Tissue-Specific Regulation of Antiviral CD8+ T-Cell Immune Responses during Chronic Viral Infection , 2004, Journal of Virology.

[11]  D. Moskophidis,et al.  Critical Role for Alpha/Beta and Gamma Interferons in Persistence of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus by Clonal Exhaustion of Cytotoxic T Cells , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[12]  M. Massari,et al.  Virus-Specific CD8+ Lymphocytes Share the Same Effector-Memory Phenotype but Exhibit Functional Differences in Acute Hepatitis B and C , 2002, Journal of Virology.

[13]  M. Salmon,et al.  Function Cell Phenotype , and Immediate Effector Relationships Between Epitope Specificity , T Cell Memory : + EBV-Specific CD 8 Salmon and , 2001 .

[14]  B. Walker,et al.  Sustained Dysfunction of Antiviral CD8+ T Lymphocytes after Infection with Hepatitis C Virus , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[15]  Todd M. Allen,et al.  Functional Impairment of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells during the Chronic Phase of Infection , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[16]  Rustom Antia,et al.  Revisiting Estimates of CTL Killing Rates In Vivo , 2007, PloS one.

[17]  Stefan Kostense,et al.  Failing immune control as a result of impaired CD8+ T-cell maturation: CD27 might provide a clue. , 2002, Trends in immunology.

[18]  J. Altman,et al.  Viral Immune Evasion Due to Persistence of Activated T Cells Without Effector Function , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[19]  J. Lieberman,et al.  Dressed to kill? A review of why antiviral CD8 T lymphocytes fail to prevent progressive immunodeficiency in HIV-1 infection. , 2001, Blood.

[20]  Stephen J. Merrill,et al.  Foundations of the use of an enzyme-kinetic analogy in cell-mediated cytotoxicity☆ , 1982 .

[21]  Rustom Antia,et al.  Estimation of the rate of killing by cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vivo , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Mario Roederer,et al.  HIV nonprogressors preferentially maintain highly functional HIV-specific CD8+ T cells. , 2006, Blood.

[23]  Vitaly V. Ganusov,et al.  Estimating In Vivo Death Rates of Targets due to CD8 T-Cell-Mediated Killing , 2008, Journal of Virology.

[24]  Annette Oxenius,et al.  Impaired NFAT nuclear translocation results in split exhaustion of virus-specific CD8+ T cell functions during chronic viral infection , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  E. Wherry,et al.  Memory CD8 T-Cell Differentiation during Viral Infection , 2004, Journal of Virology.

[26]  E. Wherry,et al.  Cutting Edge: Rapid In Vivo Killing by Memory CD8 T Cells1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[27]  Roland R. Regoes,et al.  Investigating CTL Mediated Killing with a 3D Cellular Automaton , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  B. Walker,et al.  Analysis of Successful Immune Responses in Persons Infected with Hepatitis C Virus , 2000, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[29]  Aaruni Khanolkar,et al.  Maintenance, Loss, and Resurgence of T Cell Responses During Acute, Protracted, and Chronic Viral Infections1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[30]  E. Wherry,et al.  Viral Persistence Alters CD8 T-Cell Immunodominance and Tissue Distribution and Results in Distinct Stages of Functional Impairment , 2003, Journal of Virology.