PEER behavioural research: authors and users vis-à-vis journals and repositories. D4.2 final report.

The Behavioural research project is one of three independent research projects commissioned and managed by PEER as part of the PEER Observatory. The aim of the Behavioural research project was to address the role of stage-two manuscript repositories in the scholarly and scientific communication system by exploring perceptions, motivations and behaviours of authors and readers. The research was carried out between April 2009 and August 2011 by the Department of Information Science and LISU at Loughborough University, UK.

[1]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Collaborative information synthesis , 2005, ASIST.

[2]  Jillian R. Griffiths,et al.  Communicating knowledge: how and why UK researchers publish and disseminate their findings , 2009 .

[3]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Returns to science: computer networks in oceanography , 1993, CACM.

[4]  Jingfeng Xia,et al.  Assessment of Self-archiving in Institutional Repositories: Across Disciplines , 2007 .

[5]  Jingfeng Xia.  A Comparison of Subject and Institutional Repositories in Self-archiving Practices , 2008 .

[6]  Stephen Pinfield,et al.  Journals and repositories: an evolving relationship? , 2009 .

[7]  Jan Krause,et al.  Towards Open Access Publishing in High Energy Physics : Report of the SCOAP3 Working Party , 2007 .

[8]  G. Pronk,et al.  Three Perspectives on the Evolving Infrastructure of Institutional Research Repositories in Europe , 2009 .

[9]  S. Harnad,et al.  Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals , 2004 .

[10]  J. Houghton,et al.  Economic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models : exploring the costs and benefits. JISC EI-ASPM Project. A report to the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) , 2009 .

[11]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Electronic Journals and Changes in Scholarly Article Seeking and Reading Patterns , 2008, D Lib Mag..

[12]  Jingfeng Xia,et al.  Assessment of Self-Archiving in Institutional Repositories: Depositorship and Full-Text Availability , 2007 .

[13]  Diana Hicks,et al.  The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences , 1999, Scientometrics.

[14]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles? , 2006, Scientometrics.

[15]  Peter Igo-Kemenes,et al.  First results of the SOAP project. Open access publishing in 2010 , 2010, ArXiv.

[16]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Electronic scholarly publishing and open access , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[17]  James H. Walther.  Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians and Publishers , 2001 .

[18]  Alma Swan,et al.  Authors and electronic publishing: what authors want from the new technology , 2003, Learn. Publ..

[19]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Does e-journal investment lead to greater academic productivity? , 2009 .

[20]  K. Antelman.  Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? , 2004 .

[21]  Shefali Virkar,et al.  Search Engines and Expertise about Global Issues: Well-defined Landscape or Undomesticated Wilderness? , 2008 .

[22]  A. Swan.  Open Access and the progress of science , 2007 .

[23]  Sarah Watson,et al.  Authors' attitudes to, and awareness and use of, a university institutional repository. , 2007 .

[24]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  The citation advantage of open-access articles , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Scholarly work and the shaping of digital access , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Iain D. Craig,et al.  Do open access articles have greater citation impact?: A critical review of the literature , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[27]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Perceived influence of the use of electronic information resources on scholarly work and publication productivity , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  Pauline Simpson,et al.  Repositories for research: Southampton's evolving role in the knowledge cycle , 2006, Program.

[29]  Rob Kling,et al.  Locally controlled scholarly publishing via the internet: The guild model , 2002, ASIST.

[30]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Delivery, Management and Access Model for E_prints and Open Access Journals , 2004 .

[31]  Alma Swan,et al.  Authors and open access publishing , 2004, Learn. Publ..

[32]  Anna Wojciechowska.  Analysis of the use of open archives in the fields of mathematics and computer science , 2007, OCLC Syst. Serv..

[33]  David C. Prosser.  FULFILLING THE PROMISE OF SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION - A COMPARISON BETWEEN OLD AND NEW ACCESS MODELS , 2005 .

[34]  Sally Morris,et al.  Learned societies and open access: key results from surveys of bioscience societies and researchers , 2009 .

[35]  Alma Swan,et al.  Institutions, Their Repositories and the Web , 2008 .

[36]  Alma Swan,et al.  Open access self-archiving: An author study , 2005 .

[37]  B. Björk,et al.  Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 , 2010, PloS one.

[38]  Salvatore Mele,et al.  Towards open access publishing in high energy physics: report of the SCOAP 3. working party, CERN, geneva, 19 april 2007 , 2007 .

[39]  Stephen S. Murray,et al.  The effect of use and access on citations , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[40]  S. Harnad,et al.  Maximizing and Measuring Research Impact Through University and Research-Funder Open-Access Self-Archiving Mandates. , 2009 .

[41]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact , 2005, IEEE Data Eng. Bull..

[42]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Opening Access by Overcoming Zeno's Paralysis , 2006 .

[43]  Lei Wu,et al.  Scholarly journal information‐seeking and reading patterns of faculty at five US universities , 2009, Learn. Publ..

[44]  Rick ANDERSON.  Open access — clear benefits, hidden costs , 2007, Learn. Publ..

[45]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  The Influence of the Scatter of Literature on the Use of Electronic Resources Across Disciplines: A Case Study of FinELib , 2005, ECDL.

[46]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Variations in article seeking and reading patterns of academics: What makes a difference? , 2009 .

[47]  Jenny Fry,et al.  Scholarly research and information practices: a domain analytic approach , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[48]  Laura J. Neumann,et al.  The Information Work of Interdisciplinary Humanities Scholars: Exploration and Translation , 2002, The Library Quarterly.

[49]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  The effect of 'Open Access' upon citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv's Condensed Matter Section , 2006, ArXiv.

[50]  Jr. Charles W. Bailey,et al.  Scholarly electronic publishing bibliography , 2005 .

[51]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  RoMEO Studies 8: self-archiving: The logic behind the colour-coding used in the Copyright Knowledge Bank , 2007, Program.

[52]  Carol Tenopir.  Measuring Impact and Quality , 2007 .

[53]  Kristin Antelman,et al.  Self‐archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences , 2006, Learn. Publ..

[54]  Mark Hedges,et al.  The Future of Repositories? Patterns for (Cross-)Repository Architectures , 2008, D Lib Mag..

[55]  Susan Gibbons,et al.  Understanding Faculty to Improve Content Recruitment for Institutional Repositories , 2005, D Lib Mag..

[56]  Nicholas Joint.  Institutional repositories, self-archiving and the role of the library , 2006 .

[57]  Clifford A. Lynch,et al.  Academic Institutional Repositories: Deployment Status in 13 Nations as of Mid 2005 , 2005, D-Lib Magazine.

[58]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies , 2003 .

[59]  Jihyun Kim,et al.  Motivating and Impeding Factors Affecting Faculty Contribution to Institutional Repositories , 2007, J. Digit. Inf..

[60]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Scholarly communication in the digital environment: what do authors want? , 2004, Learn. Publ..

[61]  Jenny Fry,et al.  Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[62]  Robert Campbell,et al.  Author's version vs. publisher's version: an analysis of the copy‐editing function , 2007, Learn. Publ..

[63]  Ellen Finnie Duranceau,et al.  The “Wealth of Networks” and Institutional Repositories: MIT, DSpace, and the Future of the Scholarly Commons , 2009, Libr. Trends.

[64]  Kathryn Toledano.  Scholarly communication and OAI - what are the issues for journal publishers? , 2003 .

[65]  Salvatore Mele,et al.  Information Resources in High-Energy Physics: Surveying the Present Landscape and Charting the Future Course , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[66]  David Goodman,et al.  Open access and accuracy: author‐archived manuscripts vs. published articles , 2007, Learn. Publ..