Development of the skew boundary condition for soil-structure interaction in three-dimensional finite element analysis

Abstract This paper extends the use of the skew boundary condition in two- and three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis for both structural and geotechnical applications when the need of the freedom directions at the interface nodes is different from the global Cartesian directions. For instance, jack-up structures have three conical-shaped footings, whose freedom directions at the interface nodes are not suitable for Cartesian directions. In addition, there is no axisymmetric movement of the soil as the load is applied to the jack-up's hull. Thus, a more reliable solution of jack-up-soil interaction should be analyzed in a full 3D version. This paper develops a simple 3D interface model for soil-structure interaction that uses skew boundary conditions and incorporates the visco-plastic strain method into the finite element program. The work was validated by computing bearing capacity factors of conical footings with different scenarios, such as plane strain, axisymmetric and 3D analysis. The results of the present analysis are in good agreement with the existing solutions. The fields of the displacement vector and failure patterns at the collapse state are demonstrated and discussed for each apex angle, and the influence of the conical angle on the bearing capacity factor (Nc) is also examined.

[1]  J. Kumar,et al.  Bearing capacity factors for a conical footing using lower- and upper-bound finite elements limit analysis , 2015 .

[2]  Wengang Zhang,et al.  Estimation of strut forces for braced excavation in granular soils from numerical analysis and case histories , 2019, Computers and Geotechnics.

[3]  Neil Dixon,et al.  Distribution and variability of interface shear strength and derived parameters , 2007 .

[4]  Wengang Zhang,et al.  Assessment of strut forces for braced excavation in clays from numerical analysis and field measurements , 2017 .

[5]  Jyant Kumar,et al.  Nγ for rough strip footing using the method of characteristics , 2003 .

[6]  Wengang Zhang,et al.  Investigation on passive pile responses subject to adjacent tunnelling in anisotropic clay , 2020 .

[7]  A. Goh,et al.  Numerical study of the effects of groundwater drawdown on ground settlement for excavation in residual soils , 2020, Acta Geotechnica.

[8]  Frank Wuttke,et al.  Extended zero-thickness interface element for accurate soil–pile interaction modelling , 2014 .

[9]  Richard E. Goodman,et al.  CLOSURE ON A MODEL FOR THE MECHANICS OF JOINTED ROCK , 1968 .

[10]  Victor N. Kaliakin,et al.  Insight into deficiencies associated with commonly used zero-thickness interface elements , 1995 .

[11]  Investigation of the penetration characteristics of snake skin-inspired pile using DEM , 2021 .

[12]  G. Bfer,et al.  An isoparametric joint/interface element for finite element analysis , 1985 .

[13]  Wengang Zhang,et al.  Assessment of apparent earth pressure for braced excavations in anisotropic clay , 2021, Acta Geotechnica.

[14]  Jyant Kumar,et al.  Bearing Capacity Factors for Ring Foundations , 2015 .

[15]  Alvaro L. G. A. Coutinho,et al.  Simple zero thickness kinematically consistent interface elements , 2003 .

[16]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics , 2013 .

[17]  Wengang Zhang,et al.  A simple prediction model for wall deflection caused by braced excavation in clays , 2015 .

[18]  Jyant Kumar,et al.  Bearing capacity factors of circular foundations for a general c–ϕ soil using lower bound finite elements limit analysis , 2011 .

[19]  Ignacio Carol,et al.  On zero‐thickness interface elements for diffusion problems , 2004 .

[20]  de R René Borst,et al.  On the numerical integration of interface elements , 1993 .

[21]  Wengang Zhang,et al.  Influence of groundwater drawdown on excavation responses – A case history in Bukit Timah granitic residual soils , 2018, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.

[22]  Jyant Kumar,et al.  Bearing capacity computation for a ring foundation using the stress characteristics method , 2017 .

[23]  David M. Potts,et al.  Zero thickness interface elements—numerical stability and application , 1994 .

[24]  O. Zienkiewicz,et al.  ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR PROBLEMS IN ROCK MECHANICS WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO JOINTED ROCK SYSTEMS , 1970 .

[25]  Jamshid Ghaboussi,et al.  Finite element for rock joints and interfaces , 1973 .

[26]  Musharraf Zaman,et al.  Thin‐layer element for interfaces and joints , 1984 .

[27]  O. C. Zienkiewicz.  Visco-plasticity and plasticity An alternative for finite element solution of material nonlinearities , 1973, Computing Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering.

[28]  Xinyu Yang,et al.  A simplified prediction method for evaluating tunnel displacement induced by laterally adjacent excavations , 2018 .

[29]  O. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Time-dependent multilaminate model of rocks—a numerical study of deformation and failure of rock masses , 1977 .

[30]  L. Prandtl,et al.  Hauptaufsätze: Über die Eindringungsfestigkeit (Härte) plastischer Baustoffe und die Festigkeit von Schneiden , 1921 .

[31]  Jesús Emilio Gómez,et al.  Development of an extended hyperbolic model for concrete-to-soil interfaces , 2000 .

[32]  N. Manoharan,et al.  Bearing capacity of surface footings by finite elements , 1995 .

[33]  K. G. Sharma,et al.  On joint/interface elements and associated problems of numerical ill‐conditioning , 1979 .

[34]  Professor Lothar Gaul,et al.  Modeling of Contact Interfaces in Built-up Structures by Zero-thickness Elements , 2007 .

[35]  Jian Chu,et al.  Application of transparent soil model test and DEM simulation in study of tunnel failure mechanism , 2018 .

[36]  Wengang Zhang,et al.  Numerical study of the performance of jet grout piles for braced excavations in soft clay , 2020 .

[37]  Paul J Cosentino,et al.  Innovations in Geotechnical Engineering , 2018 .

[38]  D. V. Griffiths,et al.  Programming the Finite Element Method: Smith/Programming the Finite Element Method , 2015 .

[39]  D. V. Griffiths.  Numerical studies of soil–structure interaction using a simple interface model , 1988 .

[40]  D. V. Griffiths.  COMPUTATION OF BEARING CAPACITY FACTORS USING FINITE ELEMENTS , 1982 .

[41]  Hiroshi Morioka,et al.  FLAC/PFC coupled numerical simulation of AE in large-scale underground excavations , 2007 .

[42]  J. Kumar,et al.  The size effect of a conical footing on N-gamma , 2016 .

[43]  Bak Kong Low,et al.  System Reliability Assessment for a Rock Tunnel with Multiple Failure Modes , 2013, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[44]  G W Clough,et al.  Finite Element Analyses of Retaining Wall Behavior , 1971 .

[45]  Wengang Zhang,et al.  A simple estimation model for 3D braced excavation wall deflection , 2017 .

[46]  Malcolm D. Bolton,et al.  Vertical bearing capacity factors for circular and strip footings on Mohr–Coulomb soil , 1993 .

[47]  Bak Kong Low,et al.  Probabilistic analysis of underground rock excavations using response surface method and SORM , 2011 .

[48]  Wengang Zhang,et al.  Numerical investigation of pile responses caused by adjacent braced excavation in soft clays , 2018, International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering.

[49]  Sadok Benmebarek,et al.  Numerical evaluation of the bearing capacity factor N’c of circular and ring footings , 2017 .

[50]  P A Lane,et al.  COMPUTATION OF THE ULTIMATE PRESSURE OF A LATERALLY LOADED CIRCULAR PILE IN FRICTIONAL SOIL. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUMERICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 11-15 APRIL 1988, INNSBRUCK, AUSTRIA. VOLUMES 1 - 3 , 1988 .