Design Team Convergence: The Influence of Example Solution Quality

This study examines how engineering design teams converge to a common understanding of a design problem and its solution, how that is influenced by the information given to them before problem solving and how it is correlated with quality of produced solutions. To understand convergence, a model of the team members’ representations was sought through a cognitive engineering design study, specifically examining the effect of the introduction of a poor example solution and a good example solution prior to problem solving. Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) was used to track the teams’ convergence. Introducing a poor example solution was shown to have a slowing effect on teams’ convergence over time and quality of design, while the good example solution was not significantly different than the control (no example solution) in its effects on convergence, but did cause higher quality solutions. This may have implications for design team performance in practice.© 2009 ASME

[1]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty , 2010 .

[2]  Mark Steyvers,et al.  Topics in semantic representation. , 2007, Psychological review.

[3]  Michael J. Strait,et al.  Applications of Latent Semantic Analysis To Lessons Learned Systems , 2000 .

[4]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. , 1991, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Text analysis for constructing design representations , 1997, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[7]  K. Kotovsky,et al.  The influence of open goals on the acquisition of problem-relevant information. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  S. Karau,et al.  Group Decision Making: The Effects of Initial Preferences and Time Pressure , 1999 .

[9]  Andy Dong,et al.  The latent semantic approach to studying design team communication , 2005 .

[10]  T. B. Ward,et al.  The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[11]  W. D. Compton,et al.  Project Goals, Team Performance, and Shared Understanding , 1999 .

[12]  R. Weisberg,et al.  Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  D. Dahl,et al.  The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking during New Product Ideation , 2002 .

[14]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  The Measurement of Textual Coherence with Latent Semantic Analysis. , 1998 .

[15]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance , 2006 .

[16]  T. Landauer,et al.  Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis , 1990 .

[17]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  The role of timing and analogical similarity in the stimulation of idea generation in design , 2008 .

[18]  Moss Jarrod,et al.  Design Ideas and Impasses: the Role of Open Goals , 2007 .

[19]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  Spontaneous Access and Analogical Incubation Effects , 2005 .

[20]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[21]  D. Dougherty Understanding New Markets for New Products , 2007 .

[22]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design and other types of fixation , 1996 .

[23]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  An introduction to latent semantic analysis , 1998 .

[24]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Modality and representation in analogy , 2008, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[25]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  “Collaborating To Success”: An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques , 2005 .

[26]  A. Griffin PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices , 1997 .

[27]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  A Document Analysis Method for Characterizing Design Team Performance , 2004 .

[28]  K. Crowley,et al.  The microgenetic method. A direct means for studying cognitive development. , 1991, The American psychologist.