TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: THE CASE OF BUSINESS COMPUTING*

The dominant explanation for the spread of technological innovations emphasizes processes of influence and information flow. Firms which are closely connected to pre-existing users of an innovation learn about it and adopt it early on. Firms at the periphery of communication networks are slower to adopt. This paper develops an alternative model which emphasizes the role of know-how and organizational learning as potential barriers to adoption of innovations. Firms delay in-house adoption of complex technology until they obtain sufficient technical know-how to implement and operate it successfully. In response to knowledge barriers, new institutions come into existence which progressively lower those barriers, and make it easier for firms to adopt and use the technology without extensive in-house expertise. Service bureaus, consultants, and simplification of the technology are examples. As knowledge barriers are lowered, diffusion speeds up, and one observes a transition from an early pattern in which the new technology is typically obtained as a service to a later pattern of in-house provision of the technology. Thus the diffusion of technology is reconceptualized in terms of organizational learning, skill development, and knowledge barriers. The utility of this approach is shown through an empirical study of the diffusion of business computing in the United States, reporting survey and ethnographic data on the spread of business computing, on the learning processes and skills required, and on the changing institutional practices that facilitated diffusion. (ORGANIZATION LEARNING AND DIFFUSION TECHNOLOGY)

[1]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[2]  A. Young,et al.  The Plastics Industry: A Comparative Study of Research and Innovation , 1963, National Institute Economic Review.

[3]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[4]  Jeremiah J. O'Connell,et al.  Managing organizational innovation , 1968 .

[5]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Industrial Research and Technological Innovation: An Econometric Analysis , 1968 .

[6]  M. Aiken,et al.  The Organic Organization and Innovation , 1971 .

[7]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[8]  D. X. Freedman,et al.  Heroin epidemics. , 1973, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

[9]  Fred P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month , 1975, Reliable Software.

[10]  O. Williamson Markets and Hierarchies , 1975 .

[11]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  Technological Diffusion and the Computer Revolution: The UK Experience , 1976 .

[12]  A. Pred,et al.  City-systems in advanced economies: Past growth, present processes and future development options , 1977 .

[13]  James N. Danziger,et al.  Technological Innovation in Local Government: The Case of Computers , 1977 .

[14]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[15]  Glenn C. Loury,et al.  Market Structure and Innovation , 1979 .

[16]  S. Davies The Diffusion of Process Innovations , 1979 .

[17]  J. Ettlie Manpower Flows and the Innovation Process , 1980 .

[18]  E. Rogers,et al.  Reinvention in the Innovation Process , 1980 .

[19]  Patrick Kelly,et al.  Technological innovation : a critical review of current knowledge , 1981 .

[20]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[21]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[22]  J. Gershuny The new service economy , 1983 .

[23]  John F. Rockart,et al.  The management of end user computing , 1983, CACM.

[24]  F. Fisher,et al.  IBM and the U.S. data processing industry: An economic history , 1983 .

[25]  K. Pavitt Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[26]  Rob Kling,et al.  The control of information systems developments after implementation , 1984, CACM.

[27]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  Models for innovation diffusion , 1985 .

[28]  Ralph H. Sprague,et al.  Information systems management in practice , 1985 .

[29]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out , 1985 .

[30]  Paul Jowett,et al.  The economics of information technology , 1986 .

[31]  Tora K. Bikson,et al.  Assessing the Forest Service's Implementation of an Agency-wide Information System , 1986 .

[32]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[33]  William E. Leigh,et al.  Distributed intelligence: Trade-offs and decisions for computer information systems , 1987 .

[34]  J. Robins,et al.  Organizational Economics: Notes on the Use of Transaction-Cost Theory in the Study of Organizations. , 1987 .

[35]  R. Burt Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .

[37]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[38]  Peter A. Clark,et al.  Anglo-American innovation , 1987 .

[39]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[40]  D. Gerwin,et al.  A theory of innovation processes for computer-aided manufacturing technology , 1988 .

[41]  Rob Kling,et al.  Computer Systems as Institutions: Social Dimensions of Computing in Organizations , 1988, ICIS.

[42]  P. Attewell,et al.  What Do Computers Do , 1989 .

[43]  M. Fleischer,et al.  processes of technological innovation , 1990 .

[44]  S. Winter,et al.  In search of useful theory of innovation , 1993 .

[45]  Kenneth C. Laudon,et al.  Management Information Systems: A Contemporary Perspective , 1993 .