3D image interpolation based on directional coherence

Image interpolation is of great importance in biomedical visualization and analysis. In this paper, we present a novel gray-level interpolation method called Directional Coherence Interpolation (DCI). The principle advantage of the proposed approach is that it leads to significantly higher visual quality in 3D rendering when compared with traditional image interpolation methods. The basis of DCI is a form of directional image-space coherence. DCI interpolates the missing image data along the maximum coherence directions (MCD), which are estimated from the local image intensity yet constrained by a generic smoothness term. Since the edges of the image and the contents of the objects are well preserved along the MCDs, DCI can incorporate image shape and structure information without the prior requirement of explicit representation of object boundary/surface. A number of experiments were performed on both synthetic and real medical images to evaluate the proposed approach. The experimental results show that in addition to the substantial improvement of visual effects (qualitative evaluation), the quantitative error measures of DCI are also better than the conventional gray level linear interpolation. Comparing with the shape-based interpolation scheme applied on gray-level images, DCI has much lower computation cost.

[1]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Shape-based tracking of left ventricular wall motion , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Lawrence H. Staib,et al.  Boundary Finding with Prior Shape and Smoothness Models , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Characterization of Signals from Multiscale Edges , 2011, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  M. Levoy,et al.  Fast volume rendering using a shear-warp factorization of the viewing transformation , 1994, SIGGRAPH.

[5]  William A. Barrett,et al.  Optical flow interpolation of serial slice images , 1993 .

[6]  Richard A. Robb,et al.  Biomedical Imaging, Visualization, and Analysis , 1999 .

[7]  Thomas Martin Deserno,et al.  Survey: interpolation methods in medical image processing , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Tong-Yee Lee,et al.  Morphology-based Three-dimensional Interpolation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[9]  J. Udupa,et al.  Shape-based interpolation of multidimensional objects. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[10]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Shape-based interpolation of multidimensional grey-level images , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[11]  E SutherlandIvan,et al.  A Characterization of Ten Hidden-Surface Algorithms , 1974 .

[12]  Stephen M. Pizer,et al.  Object-based interpolation via cores , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Baining Guo,et al.  Progressive radiance evaluation using directional coherence maps , 1998, SIGGRAPH.

[14]  A. Ardeshir Goshtasby,et al.  Matching of tomographic slices for interpolation , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[15]  Marc Levoy,et al.  Display of surfaces from volume data , 1988, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[16]  J. Udupa,et al.  An objective comparison of 3-D image interpolation methods , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Carolyn A. Bucholtz,et al.  Shape-based interpolation , 1992, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.