Transfers to sustain core-theoretic cooperation in international stock pollutant control 1

International environmental agreements aiming at correcting negative externalities generated by transboundary pollution are difficult to achieve for many reasons. Important obstacles arise from asymmetry in costs and benefits, and instability may occur due to the fact that coalitions of countries may attempt to do better for themselves outside of any proposed agreement. In a static context it has already been shown that it is possible to achieve stability in the sense of the core of a cooperative game, by means of appropriately defined transfers between the countries involved. However, the transboundary pollution problems that are most important are caused by accumulated pollutants so that a dynamic analysis is required. This paper provides a transfer scheme that yields a core property in a dynamic context. The possibility of computing such transfers numerically is discussed. keywords : transfrontier pollution; stock pollutant; dynamic cooperative games; coalitions; core solution. JEL classification: C 73, D 62, F 42, H 4, Q 3

[1]  Allen D. Glenn,et al.  The Acid Rain Game. , 1982 .

[2]  F. Ploeg,et al.  International aspects of pollution control , 1992 .

[3]  M. Pohjola,et al.  Transboundary air pollution and soil acidification: A dynamic analysis of an acid rain game between Finland and the USSR , 1992, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[4]  Harold Houba,et al.  Strategic bargaining for the control of a dynamic system in state-space form , 1992 .

[5]  M. Hoel Emission Taxes in a Dynamic International Game of CO2 Emissions , 1992 .

[6]  C. Carraro,et al.  Strategies for the international protection of the environment , 1993 .

[7]  Olli Tahvonen,et al.  Carbon dioxide abatement as a differential game , 1994 .

[8]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[9]  S. Barrett Self-enforcing international environmental agreements , 1994 .

[10]  Parkash Chander,et al.  A core-theoretic solution for the design of cooperative agreements on transfrontier pollution , 1995 .

[11]  Georges Zaccour,et al.  A multistage supergame of downstream pollution , 1996 .

[12]  H. Tulkens Cooperation vs. Free Riding in International Environmental Affairs: Two Approaches , 1997 .

[13]  Parkash Chander,et al.  The core of an economy with multilateral environmental externalities , 1997, Int. J. Game Theory.

[14]  Philippe L. Toint,et al.  Financial transfers to ensure cooperative international optimality in stock pollutant abatement , 1997 .

[15]  K. Mäler,et al.  The Acid Rain Differential Game , 1998 .