Line width roughness reduction strategies for patterns exposed via electron beam lithography

Among the different next generation lithography techniques, multibeam may arise as a cost effective solution to pattern sub-22nm technological nodes. A low LWR is required to keep downscaling. In this study, capability of producing low LWR 32/32nm L/S patterns with two different ebeam tools was evaluated. One state-of-the-art single variable shapedbeam (50kV) VISTEC SB3054 and a multiple Gaussian beam MAPPER ASTERIX pre-alpha tool (5kV) are used. Thanks to the great flexibility of e-beam lithography, exposure of biased designs in which the exposed area is reduced is carried out. Such exposure strategy showed a great effectiveness to lower LWR (down to around 3.0nm). To reduce further LWR some post litho-treatments such as thermal processing, plasma treatments and UV treatments are used on patterns exposed with VISTEC SB3054. A combination of a biased exposure and post-litho treatments reduced initial 4.8nm LWR down to 2.8nm (41.7% reduction). Once complete the LWR reduction protocol will be transferred on MAPPER exposures.

[1]  A. Bazin,et al.  Mechanisms involved in HBr and Ar cure plasma treatments applied to 193 nm photoresists , 2009 .

[2]  Hye-Keun Oh,et al.  Line Edge Roughness Reduction Using Resist Reflow Process for 22 nm Node Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography , 2010 .

[3]  Marc Fouchier,et al.  Smoothing mechanisms involved in thermal treatment for linewidth roughness reduction of 193-nm photoresist patterns , 2013 .

[4]  Remco Jager,et al.  Optimum dose for shot noise limited CD uniformity in electron-beam lithography , 2004 .

[5]  L. Pain,et al.  5 kV multielectron beam lithography: MAPPER tool and resist process characterization , 2010 .

[6]  S. De Gendt,et al.  Line edge and width roughness smoothing by plasma treatment , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Pieter Kruit,et al.  Predicted effect of shot noise on contact hole dimension in e-beam lithography , 2006 .

[8]  Arpan P. Mahorowala,et al.  Line edge roughness reduction by plasma curing photoresists , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Olivier Joubert,et al.  Plasma impact on 193 nm photoresist linewidth roughness: Role of plasma vacuum ultraviolet light , 2009 .

[11]  P. Kruit,et al.  Local critical dimension variation from shot-noise related line edge roughness , 2005 .

[12]  Olivier Joubert,et al.  Unbiased line width roughness measurements with critical dimension scanning electron microscopy and critical dimension atomic force microscopy , 2012 .

[13]  Hiroichi Kawahira,et al.  Changes of chemical nature of photoresists induced by various plasma treatments and their impact on LWR , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[14]  David B. Graves,et al.  Effects of vacuum ultraviolet photons, ion energy and substrate temperature on line width roughness and RMS surface roughness of patterned 193 nm photoresist , 2011 .

[15]  Jin-Ho Park,et al.  Impact of surface treatment on resist reflow process , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[16]  Han-Ku Cho,et al.  Effects of various plasma pretreatments on 193 nm photoresist and linewidth roughness after etching , 2006 .

[17]  Atsushi Hiraiwa,et al.  Discrete power spectrum of line width roughness , 2009 .

[18]  Roel Gronheid,et al.  Line Width Roughness mitigation in chemically amplified resist by post-litho processes , 2010 .