Discovering a one-dimensional active subspace to quantify multidisciplinary uncertainty in satellite system design

Abstract Uncertainty quantification has recently been receiving much attention from aerospace engineering community. With ever-increasing requirements for robustness and reliability, it is crucial to quantify multidisciplinary uncertainty in satellite system design which dominates overall design direction and cost. However, coupled multi-disciplines and cross propagation hamper the efficiency and accuracy of high-dimensional uncertainty analysis. In this study, an uncertainty quantification methodology based on active subspaces is established for satellite conceptual design. The active subspace effectively reduces the dimension and measures the contributions of input uncertainties. A comprehensive characterization of associated uncertain factors is made and all subsystem models are built for uncertainty propagation. By integrating a system decoupling strategy, the multidisciplinary uncertainty effect is efficiently represented by a one-dimensional active subspace for each design. The identified active subspace is checked by bootstrap resampling for confidence intervals and verified by Monte Carlo propagation for the accuracy. To show the performance of active subspaces, 18 uncertainty parameters of an Earth observation small satellite are exemplified and then another 5 design uncertainties are incorporated. The uncertainties that contribute the most to satellite mass and total cost are ranked, and the quantification of high-dimensional uncertainty is achieved by a relatively small number of support samples. The methodology with considerably less cost exhibits high accuracy and strong adaptability, which provides a potential template to tackle multidisciplinary uncertainty in practical satellite systems.

[1]  Shenyan Chen,et al.  Satellite Multidisciplinary Design Optimization with a High-Fidelity Model , 2013 .

[2]  Dongbin Xiu,et al.  High-Order Collocation Methods for Differential Equations with Random Inputs , 2005, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  Karl Iagnemma,et al.  A polynomial chaos approach to the analysis of vehicle dynamics under uncertainty , 2012 .

[4]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Robustness-Based Design Optimization of Multidisciplinary System Under Epistemic Uncertainty , 2013 .

[5]  R. DeVore,et al.  Compressed sensing and best k-term approximation , 2008 .

[6]  Natasha Smith,et al.  Efficient first-order reliability analysis of multidisciplinary systems , 2006 .

[7]  Ernst Eberlein,et al.  State modelling of the land mobile propagation channel for dual-satellite systems , 2012, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[8]  Rodolphe Le Riche,et al.  Challenges and future trends in Uncertainty-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for space transportation system design , 2013 .

[9]  Luis G. Crespo,et al.  The NASA Langley Multidisciplinary Uncertainty Quantification Challenge , 2014 .

[10]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[11]  Rania Hassan,et al.  Spacecraft Reliability-Based Design Optimization Under Uncertainty Including Discrete Variables , 2008 .

[12]  Trent Michael Russi,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification with Experimental Data and Complex System Models , 2010 .

[13]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization , 1994, SIAM J. Optim..

[14]  Ali Ravanbakhsh,et al.  Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Approach to Conceptual Design of a LEO Earth Observation Microsatellite , 2008 .

[15]  Johan Larsson,et al.  Exploiting active subspaces to quantify uncertainty in the numerical simulation of the HyShot II scramjet , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[16]  Xiaoqian Chen,et al.  Utilizing Uncertainty Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Conceptual Design of Space Systems , 2010 .

[17]  Dirk P. Kroese,et al.  Handbook of Monte Carlo Methods , 2011 .