Phase III comparative trial using CHOP vs CIOP in the treatment of advanced intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Until now, literature data support the fact that the CHOP regimen represents the standard first line treatment for patients with advanced intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Recently, idarubicin has been introduced in clinical trials because of its favourable preclinical profile: it is more active than daunorubicin and doxorubicin against a number of experimental tumour systems and is significantly less cardiotoxic in animal models. From March 1991 to June 1993, 115 previously untreated patients with stage II to IV intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, according to the Kiel classification, were enrolled in a phase III comparative trial. The objectives of the study were to compare the efficacy and safety of using idarubicin instead of doxorubicin in the polychemotherapeutic regimen CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone). Of the 115 patients registered for the trial, 103 were evaluable: 52 received CH (doxorubicin)OP and 51 received CI(Idarubicin)OP. Known prognostic factors were equally distributed among the two groups. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the rates of partial and complete response. The overall response rate was 87%, with complete response in 62%: 63% in the CHOP group, and 59% in the CIOP group. At 30 months (median 20 months), 86% of all CR patients were alive without disease in the CHOP group and 85% in the CIOP group. Patients treated with CHOP experienced severe alopecia more frequently (P = .004). Only three patients in the CIOP group showed cardiac adverse events (1 moderate and 2 mild), while in the CHOP group 4 mild, 2 moderate and 1 severe were recorded. LVEF monitoring was carried out in 31 patients of the CHOP group and in 27 of the CIOP group. A median drop of 8.3% of the LVEF was observed in patients treated with CHOP regimen as compared to 4.8% in patients with CIOP regimen (P = .0001). In this trial, the "idarubicin arm" (CIOP regimen) was found to have an equivalent therapeutic efficacy and, slightly, reduced clinical toxicity in comparison to the standard doxorubicin-containing CHOP regimen in patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

[1]  S. Pileri,et al.  MACOP-B vs F-MACHOP regimen in the treatment of high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. , 1995, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[2]  T M Grogan,et al.  Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  C. Higano,et al.  Phase II study of intravenous idarubicin in unfavorable non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1992, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[4]  L. Gordon,et al.  Comparison of a second-generation combination chemotherapeutic regimen (m-BACOD) with a standard regimen (CHOP) for advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  F. Mandelli,et al.  Anthracycline Containing Regimens in Intermediate Grade Lymphoma , 1992 .

[6]  S. Monfardini,et al.  A Phase II Study of Oral Idarubicin (4‐Demethoxidaunorubicin) in Previously Untreated Elderly Patients with Non‐Hodgkin's Lymphoma , 1991, American journal of clinical oncology.

[7]  R. Fisher,et al.  Combination chemotherapy of intermediate-grade and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with MACOP-B: a Southwest Oncology Group study. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  S. Pileri,et al.  MN (N = Novantrone) COP-B therapy on high and intermediate grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: an alternative to MA (A = adriamycin) COP-B? , 1991, Haematologica.

[9]  E. Jaffe,et al.  Superiority of ProMACE-CytaBOM over ProMACE-MOPP in the treatment of advanced diffuse aggressive lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  F. Gherlinzoni,et al.  Phase III comparative trial (m-BACOD v m-BNCOD) in the treatment of stage II to IV non-Hodgkin's lymphomas with intermediate- or high-grade histology. , 1990, Seminars in Oncology.

[11]  K. Lennert,et al.  Updated Kiel classification for lymphomas , 1989, The Journal of pathology.

[12]  M. Pasmantier,et al.  Advances in chemotherapy for large cell lymphoma. , 1987, Seminars in hematology.

[13]  M Coleman,et al.  Chemotherapy for large-cell lymphoma: optimism and caution. , 1985, Annals of internal medicine.

[14]  J. Connors,et al.  MACOP-B chemotherapy for the treatment of diffuse large-cell lymphoma. , 1985, Annals of internal medicine.

[15]  W. Hryniuk,et al.  The importance of dose intensity in chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer. , 1984, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  R. Warrell,et al.  Clinical evaluation of 4-demethoxydaunorubicin in patients with advanced malignant lymphoma. , 1983, Cancer treatment reports.

[17]  E. McFadden,et al.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group , 1982, American journal of clinical oncology.

[18]  Casazza Am Experimental evaluation of anthracycline analogs. , 1979 .

[19]  L. Goldman,et al.  Serial assessment of doxorubicin cardiotoxicity with quantitative radionuclide angiocardiography. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  K. Lennert,et al.  The Histopathology of Malignant Lymphoma , 1975 .

[21]  W. J. Conover,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics , 1972 .

[22]  M Tubiana,et al.  Report of the Committee on Hodgkin's Disease Staging Classification. , 1971, Cancer research.

[23]  David R. Cox The analysis of binary data , 1970 .

[24]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .