Towards Building and Analyzing a Social Network of Acknowledgments in Scientific and Academic Documents
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Newman. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[2] C. Lee Giles,et al. Who gets acknowledged: Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing , 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
[3] Hui Han,et al. Automatic acknowledgement indexing: expanding the semantics of contribution in the CiteSeer digital library , 2005, K-CAP '05.
[4] C. Lee Giles,et al. SEERLAB: A System for Extracting Keyphrases from Scholarly Documents , 2010, SemEval@ACL.
[5] Johan Bollen,et al. Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..
[6] Debora Shaw,et al. A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[7] D. Edge. Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Critical Review , 1979, History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teaching.
[8] Blaise Cronin,et al. Accounting for Influence: Acknowledgments in Contemporary Sociology , 1993, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[9] W. Glänzel,et al. Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship , 2004 .
[10] Jörg Sander,et al. Analysis of SIGMOD's co-authorship graph , 2003, SGMD.
[11] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. Coauthorship Patterns and Trends in the Sciences (1980-1998): A Bibliometric Study With Implications for Database Indexing and Search Strategies , 2002, Libr. Trends.
[12] Weimao Ke,et al. Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams , 2005, Complex..
[13] M. Newman. 1 Who is the best connected scientist ? A study of scientific coauthorship networks , 2004 .