Towards Building and Analyzing a Social Network of Acknowledgments in Scientific and Academic Documents

Acknowledgments in scientific and academic papers are a method of expressing appreciation and gratitude between scholars. Inside the acknowledgments section, authors usually thank different entities or individuals for their support, most commonly in terms of grants, suggestions and discussions. Social networks of authors and publications has been well studied, with an exhaustive study of nearly all network properties. However, to the best of our knowledge the social graph of acknowledgments have never been investigated. In this paper we propose building an acknowledgments graph, and study the relationships between the entities of this graph. We first describe how to extract the acknowledgments section. We then extract the entities inside the acknowledgment section, classifying them into persons or organizations. After that we take a subset of the nodes and build a directed graph between the authors of these papers and the entities being acknowledged and study the characteristics of the resulting social network.

[1]  M. Newman Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  Who gets acknowledged: Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing , 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[3]  Hui Han,et al.  Automatic acknowledgement indexing: expanding the semantics of contribution in the CiteSeer digital library , 2005, K-CAP '05.

[4]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  SEERLAB: A System for Extracting Keyphrases from Scholarly Documents , 2010, SemEval@ACL.

[5]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[6]  Debora Shaw,et al.  A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  D. Edge Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Critical Review , 1979, History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teaching.

[8]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Accounting for Influence: Acknowledgments in Contemporary Sociology , 1993, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[9]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship , 2004 .

[10]  Jörg Sander,et al.  Analysis of SIGMOD's co-authorship graph , 2003, SGMD.

[11]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Coauthorship Patterns and Trends in the Sciences (1980-1998): A Bibliometric Study With Implications for Database Indexing and Search Strategies , 2002, Libr. Trends.

[12]  Weimao Ke,et al.  Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams , 2005, Complex..

[13]  M. Newman 1 Who is the best connected scientist ? A study of scientific coauthorship networks , 2004 .