Long-term longevity and clinical outcomes of Linox S/SD implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: a single-center experience

[1]  R. Beinart,et al.  Performance of the Linox implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: A single‐center experience , 2019, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[2]  H. Servatius,et al.  Comparison of lead failure manifestation of Biotronik Linox with St. Jude Medical Riata and Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead , 2018, Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology.

[3]  Michael J Ackerman,et al.  2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  J. Rubín,et al.  Analysis of early failure of Biotronik Linox Smart implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator leads: A comparative study of three defibrillator leads , 2018, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[5]  D. Hooks,et al.  Long‐term single‐center comparison of ICD lead survival: Evidence for premature Linox lead failure , 2018, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[6]  R. Noad,et al.  Prospective Assessment of Linox Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads for Structural or Electrical Abnormalities , 2018, Advances in Therapy.

[7]  William J. Bryant,et al.  2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. , 2018, Circulation.

[8]  H. Morita,et al.  Comparison of longevity and clinical outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads among manufacturers. , 2017, Heart rhythm.

[9]  E. de Maria,et al.  Externalized conductors and insulation failure in Biotronik defibrillator leads: History repeating or a false alarm? , 2017, World journal of clinical cases.

[10]  S. Hoeks,et al.  Comparative study of the failure rates among 3 implantable defibrillator leads. , 2016, Heart rhythm.

[11]  M. Orlov,et al.  Long‐Term Evaluation of Biotronik Linox and Linoxsmart Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads , 2016, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[12]  H. Servatius,et al.  Failure rate and conductor externalization in the Biotronik Linox/Sorin Vigila implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead. , 2016, Heart rhythm.

[13]  R. Main.  Long-term Evaluation , 2016 .

[14]  C. M. Wilson,et al.  Insulation Failure of the Linox Defibrillator Lead: A Case Report and Retrospective Review of a Single Center Experience , 2015, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[15]  J. Bashir,et al.  Early Failure of the Biotronik Linox Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Lead , 2015, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[16]  Joseph A. Manfredi,et al.  Insulation Failure with Externalized Conductor of a Linox SD Lead: A Case Report , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[17]  Dominique Lacroix,et al.  A randomized study of remote follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: safety and efficacy report of the ECOST trial , 2012, European heart journal.

[18]  R. Schweikert,et al.  Automatic Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead and Generator Performance: The Lumos-T Safely RedUceS RouTine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) Trial , 2010, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[19]  N. Varma.  Remote Monitoring for Advisories: Automatic Early Detection of Silent Lead Failure , 2009, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.