Controlling for Heterogeneity in Gravity Models of Trade and Integration

This paper compares various specifications of the gravity model of trade as nested versions of a general specification that uses bilateral country-pair fixed effects to control for heterogeneity. For each specification, we show that the atheoretical restrictions used to obtain them from the general model are not supported statistically. Because the gravity model has become the "workhorse" baseline model for estimating the effects of international integration, this has important empirical implications. In particular, we show that, unless heterogeneity is accounted for correctly, gravity models can greatly overestimate the effects of integration on the volume of trade.

[1]  A. Rose,et al.  Does a Currency Union Affect Trade? The Time Series Evidence , 2001 .

[2]  H. Wall,et al.  NAFTA and the Geography of North American Trade , 2000 .

[3]  Cletus C. Coughlin,et al.  NAFTA and the changing pattern of state exports , 2000 .

[4]  H. Wall,et al.  Gravity Model Specification and the Effects of the Canada-U.S. Border , 2000 .

[5]  A. Rose,et al.  One money, one market : the effect of common currencies on trade , 2000 .

[6]  Pamela J. D. Smith.  Are Weak Patent Rights a Barrier to U.S. Exports , 1999 .

[7]  M. Lord,et al.  Regional trade patterns , 1998 .

[8]  P. Bianchi.  The political economy of economic integration , 1998 .

[9]  Laszlo Matyas,et al.  Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Model , 1997 .

[10]  Barry Eichengreen,et al.  The Role of History in Bilateral Trade Flows , 1996 .

[11]  Barry Eichengreen,et al.  Is Regionalism Simply a Diversion?: Evidence from the Evolution of the EC and Efta , 1995, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[12]  Hélène Rey,et al.  How Has Regionalism in the 1990s Affected Trade? , 1995 .

[13]  J. Helliwell.  Do National Borders Matter for Quebec's Trade? , 1995 .

[14]  Ernesto H. Stein,et al.  Trading blocs and the Americas: The natural, the unnatural, and the super-natural , 1995 .

[15]  Victor I. Oguledo,et al.  Gravity models: a reformulation and an application to discriminatory trade arrangements , 1994 .

[16]  Marcos Sanso,et al.  Bilateral trade flows, the gravity equation, and functional form , 1993 .

[17]  J. Bergstrand.  The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade , 1989 .

[18]  P. R. Fisk,et al.  An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. , 1967 .

[19]  J. Tinbergen.  Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy , 1964 .

[20]  Robert C. Feenstra,et al.  World trade flows: 1980-1997 , 2000 .

[21]  H. Wall.  Using the gravity model to estimate the costs of protection , 1999 .

[22]  S. Wei,et al.  Regionalization of World Trade and Currencies: Economics and Politics , 1998 .

[23]  A. Krueger,et al.  Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements, NBER-EASE Volume 6 , 1997 .

[24]  Dale Boisso,et al.  Economic Distance, Cultural Distance, and Openness in International Trade: Empirical Puzzles , 1997 .

[25]  Jeffrey A. Frankel,et al.  The Regionalization Of The World Economy , 1997 .

[26]  S. Wei,et al.  Open versus Closed Trade Blocs , 1997 .

[27]  A. Krueger,et al.  Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements , 1997 .

[28]  J. Frankel.  Regional Trading Blocs in the world economic system, reseñado por Antonio Ortiz-Mena L.N. , 1997 .

[29]  John Mccallum,et al.  National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns , 1995 .

[30]  J. Mendez,et al.  Regional economic integration and the volume of intra-regional trade: a comparison of developed and developing country experience. , 1983 .

[31]  Norman D. Aitken.  The Effect of the EEC and EFTA on European Trade: A Temporal Cross-Section Analysis , 1973 .