E-Democracy – Safeguarding Democracy and Human Rights in the Digital Age: 8th International Conference, e-Democracy 2019, Athens, Greece, December 12-13, 2019, Proceedings

The vast amount of accumulated information and the technologies that store, process and disseminate it are producing deep changes in society. The amount of data generated by Internet users poses great opportunities and significant challenges for political scientists. Having a positive effect in many fields, business intelligence and analytics tools are used increasingly for political purposes. Pervasive digital tracking and profiling, in combination with personalization, have become a powerful toolset for systematically influencing user behaviour. When used in political campaigns or in other efforts to shape public policy, privacy issues intertwine with electoral outcomes. The practice of targeting voters with personalized messages adapted to their personality and political views, has already raised debates about political manipulation; however, studies focusing on privacy are still scarce. Focusing on the democracy aspects and identifying the threats to privacy stemming from the use of big data technologies for political purposes, this paper identifies long-term privacy implications which may undermine fundamental features of democracy such as fair elections and political equality of all citizens. Furthermore, this paper argues that big data analytics raises the need to develop alternative narratives to the concept of privacy.

[1]  Annemarie Sprokkereef,et al.  Data Protection and the Use of Biometric Data in the EU , 2007, FIDIS.

[2]  Mohammad Mustafa Taye Understanding Semantic Web and Ontologies: Theory and Applications , 2010, ArXiv.

[3]  Shui Yu,et al.  Big Privacy: Challenges and Opportunities of Privacy Study in the Age of Big Data , 2016, IEEE Access.

[4]  David Townend,et al.  Overriding Data Subjects’ Rights in the Public Interest , 2017 .

[5]  Monica Vladoiu State-of-the-art in open courseware initiatives worldwide , 2011, Informatics Educ..

[6]  Delfina Soares,et al.  Information systems interoperability in public administration: Identifying the major acting forces through a Delphi study , 2011, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[7]  K. Rahman,et al.  Regulating Informational Infrastructure: Internet Platforms as the New Public Utilities , 2018 .

[8]  Mohammad S. Obaidat,et al.  Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Biometric Technologies , 2018, Biometric-Based Physical and Cybersecurity Systems.

[9]  Margit Sutrop,et al.  Ethical Issues in Governing Biometric Technologies , 2010, ICEB.

[10]  Paul Voigt,et al.  The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) , 2017 .

[11]  Christoph Lange,et al.  OpenCourseWare observatory: does the quality of OpenCourseWare live up to its promise? , 2014, LAK.

[12]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  Benjamin Turnbull,et al.  Automated event and social network extraction from digital evidence sources with ontological mapping , 2015, Digit. Investig..

[14]  Jeremy Wickins,et al.  The ethics of biometrics: the risk of social exclusion from the widespread use of electronic identification , 2007, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[15]  Alexandre de Streel,et al.  Contribution to Growth: European Digital Single Market: Delivering improved rights for European citizens and businesses , 2019 .

[16]  A.C.J. Sprokkereef,et al.  ETHICAL PRACTICE IN THE USE OF BIOMETRIC IDENTIFIERS WITHIN THE EU , 2007 .