Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance.

Many psychophysical studies of the ability of the human observer to detect a signal superimposed upon a uniform background, where both the signal and the background are known exactly, have been reported in the literature. In such cases, the ideal or the Bayesian observer is often used as a mathematical model of human performance since it can be readily calculated and is a good predictor of human performance for the task at hand. If, however, the background is spatially inhomogeneous (lumpy), the ideal observer becomes nonlinear, and its performance becomes difficult to evaluate. Since inhomogeneous backgrounds are commonly encountered in many practical applications, we have investigated the effects of background inhomogeneities on human performance. The task was detection of a two-dimensional Gaussian signal superimposed upon an inhomogeneous background and imaged through a pinhole imaging system. Poisson noise corresponding to a certain exposure time and aperture size was added to the detected image. A six-point rating scale technique was used to measure human performance as a function of the strength of the nonuniformities (lumpiness) in the background, the amount of blur of the imaging system, and the amount of Poisson noise in the image. The results of this study were compared with earlier theoretical predictions by Myers et al. [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 1279 (1990)] for two observer models: the optimum linear discriminant, also known as the Hotelling observer, and a nonprewhitening matched filter. Although the efficiency of the human observer relative to the Hotelling observer was only approximately 10%, the variation in human performance with respect to varying aperture size and exposure time was well predicted by the Hotelling model. The nonprewhitening model, on the other hand, fails to predict human performance in lumpy backgrounds in this study. In particular, this model predicts that performance will saturate with increasing exposure time and drop precipitously with increasing lumpiness; neither effect is observed with human observers.

[1]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Factors influencing lesion detection in medical imaging. , 1990 .

[2]  Charles E. Metz,et al.  On The Multiplex Advantage Of Coded Source/Aperture Photon Imaging , 1981, Other Conferences.

[3]  R G Swensson,et al.  Detection of small focal lesions in CT images: effects of reconstruction filters and visual display windows. , 1985, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  H. Kundel,et al.  The influence of structured noise on the detection of radiologic abnormalities. , 1974, Investigative radiology.

[5]  F. L. Engel Visual conspicuity and selective background interference in eccentric vision. , 1974, Vision research.

[6]  Theodore G. Birdsall,et al.  Definitions of d′ and η as Psychophysical Measures , 1958 .

[7]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Aperture optimization for emission imaging: effect of a spatially varying background. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  J. Robson,et al.  Spatial-frequency channels in human vision. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  B. Cole,et al.  The effect of variability of background elements on the conspicuity of objects , 1984, Vision Research.

[10]  H H Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  C E Metz,et al.  Optimum detector spatial resolution for discriminating between tumour uptake distributions in scintigraphy. , 1983, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  C E Metz,et al.  A comparison of optimum detector spatial resolution in nuclear imaging based on statistical theory and on observer performance. , 1978, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  H H Barrett,et al.  Hotelling trace criterion and its correlation with human-observer performance. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  Sing H. Lee,et al.  Optical Implementation Of The Hotelling Trace Criterion For Image Classification , 1984 .

[15]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Human Signal Detection Performance For Noisy Medical Images , 1982, Other Conferences.

[16]  Harrison H. Barrett,et al.  Quantitative Study Of Deconvolution And Display Mappings For Long-Tailed Point-Spread Functions , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[17]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Applications of Statistical Decision Theory in Nuclear Medicine , 1988 .

[18]  R L Webber,et al.  A simple model combining quantum noise and anatomical variation in radiographs. , 1984, Medical physics.

[19]  Harrison H. Barrett,et al.  Hotelling trace criterion as a figure of merit for the optimization of imaging systems , 1986 .

[20]  J A Swets,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.

[21]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Kenneth M. Hanson,et al.  Variations In Task And The Ideal Observer , 1983, Other Conferences.

[23]  H. Barrett,et al.  Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[24]  C E Metz,et al.  Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[25]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[26]  Raymond H. Myers,et al.  Estimation and hypothesis testing in regression in the presence of nonhomogeneous error variances , 1983 .

[27]  K. Hanson,et al.  Detectability in computed tomographic images. , 1979, Medical physics.

[28]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[29]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[30]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.