A Fully Bayesian Inversion for Spatial Distribution of Fault Slip with Objective Smoothing

Abstract In inversion of geodetic data for spatial distribution of fault slip under smoothing and positivity constraints, subjective or incorrect techniques are often employed to select a smoothing parameter that determines the relative weight placed on fitting the data versus smoothing the slip distribution. A popular objective method based on Akaike’s Bayesian information criterion (ABIC) is incorrect if positivity constraints are employed. We introduce a fully probabilistic inversion method to simultaneously estimate the slip distribution and smoothing parameter objectively and correctly in a Bayesian framework. The complete solution to the inverse problem, the joint posterior probability density function of slip and smoothing parameter, is formulated using Bayes’ theorem and sampled with a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. We apply the new method to coseismic displacement data from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake and compare the results of our method with conventional methods. The slip distribution estimated with our method is significantly smoother than that estimated by the ABIC-based method, demonstrating that the ABIC-based method may in general generate significantly undersmoothed or oversmoothed slip distributions under positivity constraints. On the other hand, the estimated slip distribution is similar to that estimated using another conventional method based on cross validation. Multiple trade-off curve plots between slip roughness and data misfit show that trade-off curves provide no basis for selecting a single smoothing parameter. The new method is easily generalized to slip inversions of multiple data sets with unknown relative weighting and to slip inversions with unknown fault geometry parameters.

[1]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .

[2]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  New, improved version of generic mapping tools released , 1998 .

[3]  Tim J. Wright,et al.  A non-linear geodetic data inversion using ABIC for slip distribution on a fault with an unknown dip angle , 2006 .

[4]  W. Prescott,et al.  Distribution of interseismic slip rates and the potential for significant earthquakes on the Calaveras fault, central California , 2003 .

[5]  Masaya Matsuura,et al.  Geodetic data inversion using a Bayesian information criterion for spatial distribution of fault slip , 1992 .

[6]  G. Kitagawa Smoothness priors analysis of time series , 1996 .

[7]  Yutaka Murakami,et al.  The Fourier transform of controlled-source time-domain electromagnetic data by smooth spectrum inversion , 2001 .

[8]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[9]  Y. Hsu,et al.  Preseismic deformation and coseismic displacements associated With the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake , 2004 .

[10]  Zhong Lu,et al.  Constraining the Slip Distribution and Fault Geometry of the Mw 7.9, 3 November 2002, Denali Fault Earthquake with Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar and Global Positioning System Data , 2004 .

[11]  H. Zebker,et al.  Fault Slip Distribution of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake, Estimated from Satellite Radar and GPS Measurements , 2002 .

[12]  Y. Okada Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1985 .

[13]  Makoto Murakami,et al.  Coseismic and postseismic crustal deformation after the Mw 8 Tokachi-oki earthquake in Japan , 2004 .

[14]  Jeffrey T. Freymueller,et al.  Coseismic slip distribution of the 2002 MW7.9 Denali fault earthquake, Alaska, determined from GPS measurements , 2003 .

[15]  P. Segall,et al.  The co-seismic slip distribution of the Landers earthquake , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[16]  Eric J. Fielding,et al.  Coseismic and Postseismic Slip of the 2004 Parkfield Earthquake from Space-Geodetic Data , 2006 .

[17]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[18]  G. Wahba Spline models for observational data , 1990 .

[19]  P. Segall,et al.  Comparison of various inversion techniques as applied to the determination of a geophysical deformation model for the 1983 Borah Peak earthquake , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[20]  F. Pollitz,et al.  Coseismic slip distribution of the 1923 Kanto earthquake, Japan , 2005 .

[21]  S. Miyazaki,et al.  Distribution of seismic coupling on the subducting plate boundary in northeastern Japan inferred from GPS observations , 2000 .

[22]  S. Yoshioka Coseismic Slip Distribution of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake Deduced from Inversion Analysis of GPS Data , 2004 .

[23]  P. Segall,et al.  Estimation of depth‐dependent fault slip from measured surface deformation with application to the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake , 1993 .

[24]  H. Kao,et al.  The chi-Chi earthquake sequence: active, out-of-sequence thrust faulting in taiwan , 2000, Science.

[25]  C. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[26]  Paul Segall,et al.  Fault geometry and slip distribution of the 1999 Chi‐Chi, Taiwan Earthquake imaged from inversion of GPS data , 2001 .

[27]  Paul Segall,et al.  Imaging the ramp-decollement geometry of the Chelungpu fault using coseismic GPS displacements from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake , 2004 .

[28]  Dani Gamerman,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference , 1997 .

[29]  A. Freed,et al.  Afterslip (and only afterslip) following the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake , 2007 .