Conservation and variation of gene regulation in embryonic stem cells assessed by comparative genomics

We have examined the gene structure and regulatory regions of octamer-binding transcription factor 3/4 (Oct 3/4), sex determining region Y box 2 (Sox2), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3), embryonal stem cell-specific gene 1 (ESG), nanog homeobox (Nanog), and several other genes highly expressed in embryonic stem (ES) cells across different species. Our analysis showed that ES cell-expressed Ras (ERAS) was orthologous to a human pseudogene Harvey Ras (HRASP) and that the promoter and other regulatory sequences were highly divergent. No ortholog of (ES) cell-derived homeobox containing gene (Ehox) could be identified in human, and the closest paralogs PEPP gene subfamily 1 (PEPP1), PEPP2, and extraembryonic, spermatogenesis, homeobox 1 (Esx1) were not expressed by ES cells and shared little homology. The Sox2 promoter was the most conserved across species and the Oct3/4 promoter region showed significant homology particularly in the distal enhancer active in ES cells. Analysis suggested common and divergent pathways of regulation. Conserved Oct3/4 and Sox2 co-binding domains were identified in most ES expressed genes, highlighting the importance of this transcriptional pathway. Conserved fibroblast growth factor response element sites were identified in regulatory regions, suggesting a potential parallel pathway for regulation by FGFs. A central role of Stat3 activation in self-renewal and in a regulatory feedback loop was suggested by the identification of the conserved binding sites in most pathways. Although most pathways were evolutionarily conserved, promoters and genomic structure of the leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) pathway components were divergent, likely explaining the differential requirement of LIF for human and rodent cells. Our analysis further suggested that the Nanog regulatory pathway was relatively independent of the LIF/Oct pathway and may interact with the Nodal/transforming growth factor-β pathway. These results provide a framework for examining the current reported differences between rodent and human ES cells and define targets for future perturbation studies.

[1]  J. Miyazaki,et al.  Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[2]  J. Thomson,et al.  Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. , 1998, Science.

[3]  Janet Rossant,et al.  Gene expression profiling of embryo-derived stem cells reveals candidate genes associated with pluripotency and lineage specificity. , 2002, Genome research.

[4]  M. Wilkinson,et al.  Two novel human X-linked homeobox genes, hPEPP1 and hPEPP2, selectively expressed in the testis. , 2002, Gene.

[5]  E. Soeda,et al.  The human c-Ha-ras2 is a processed pseudogene inactivated by numerous base substitutions. , 1984, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  H. Schöler,et al.  Nanog A New Recruit to the Embryonic Stem Cell Orchestra , 2003, Cell.

[7]  J. Thomson,et al.  Isolation of a primate embryonic stem cell line. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  P. Herrlich,et al.  Transcriptional cross-talk, the second mode of steroid hormone receptor action , 1998, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[9]  L. Forrester,et al.  Cloning and Characterization of Ehox, a Novel Homeobox Gene Essential for Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  A. Sharrocks,et al.  The ETS-domain transcription factor family. , 1997, Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology.

[11]  Lior Pachter,et al.  VISTA : visualizing global DNA sequence alignments of arbitrary length , 2000, Bioinform..

[12]  P. Lansdorp,et al.  Telomeres, telomerase, and hematopoietic stem cell biology. , 2003, Archives of medical research.

[13]  A. Smith,et al.  Buffalo rat liver cells produce a diffusible activity which inhibits the differentiation of murine embryonal carcinoma and embryonic stem cells. , 1987, Developmental biology.

[14]  S. Melmed,et al.  Identification of an Upstream Enhancer within a Functional Promoter of the Human Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Receptor Gene and Its Alternative Promoter Usage* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  H. Schöler,et al.  Octamania: the POU factors in murine development. , 1991, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[16]  Y. Suzuki,et al.  Structural analyses of the UTF1 gene encoding a transcriptional coactivator expressed in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. , 2001, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[17]  Ying Guo,et al.  The embryonic stem cell transcription factors Oct-4 and FoxD3 interact to regulate endodermal-specific promoter expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  J. Nichols,et al.  Functional Expression Cloning of Nanog, a Pluripotency Sustaining Factor in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2003, Cell.

[19]  D. Ambrosetti,et al.  Synergistic activation of the fibroblast growth factor 4 enhancer by Sox2 and Oct-3 depends on protein-protein interactions facilitated by a specific spatial arrangement of factor binding sites , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[20]  H. Hamada,et al.  The oct3 gene, a gene for an embryonic transcription factor, is controlled by a retinoic acid repressible enhancer. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[21]  M. Murakami,et al.  The Homeoprotein Nanog Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Mouse Epiblast and ES Cells , 2003, Cell.

[22]  H. Niwa,et al.  Molecular mechanism to maintain stem cell renewal of ES cells. , 2001, Cell structure and function.

[23]  M. Carpenter,et al.  In Vitro Expansion of a Multipotent Population of Human Neural Progenitor Cells , 1999, Experimental Neurology.

[24]  P. Mason Stem cells, telomerase and dyskeratosis congenita , 2003, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[25]  A. Brivanlou,et al.  Molecular signature of human embryonic stem cells and its comparison with the mouse. , 2003, Developmental biology.

[26]  R. Puri,et al.  Gene expression in human embryonic stem cell lines: unique molecular signature. , 2004, Blood.

[27]  R. Lang,et al.  Distinct regulatory elements govern Fgf4 gene expression in the mouse blastocyst, myotomes, and developing limb. , 1998, Developmental biology.

[28]  Hans Clevers,et al.  Armadillo Coactivates Transcription Driven by the Product of the Drosophila Segment Polarity Gene dTCF , 1997, Cell.

[29]  Lior Pachter,et al.  MAVID multiple alignment server , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  H. Schöler,et al.  Germline regulatory element of Oct-4 specific for the totipotent cycle of embryonal cells. , 1996, Development.

[31]  H. Kondoh,et al.  Pairing SOX off: with partners in the regulation of embryonic development. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[32]  J. Nichols,et al.  Expression of a novel homeobox gene Ehox in trophoblast stem cells and pharyngeal pouch endoderm , 2003, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[33]  P. Leder,et al.  Murine FGFR-1 is required for early postimplantation growth and axial organization. , 1994, Genes & development.

[34]  A. Rizzino,et al.  Isolation, characterization, and differential expression of the murine Sox-2 promoter. , 2000, Gene.

[35]  M. Shen,et al.  Dual Roles of Cripto as a Ligand and Coreceptor in the Nodal Signaling Pathway , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[36]  John K. Heath,et al.  Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides , 1988, Nature.

[37]  M. Katsuki,et al.  STAT3 activation is sufficient to maintain an undifferentiated state of mouse embryonic stem cells , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[38]  L. Doyle,et al.  Promoter characterization and genomic organization of the human breast cancer resistance protein (ATP-binding cassette transporter G2) gene. , 2001, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[39]  D. Kingsley,et al.  The TGF-beta superfamily: new members, new receptors, and new genetic tests of function in different organisms. , 1994, Genes & development.

[40]  H. Kondoh,et al.  Functional analysis of chicken Sox2 enhancers highlights an array of diverse regulatory elements that are conserved in mammals. , 2003, Developmental cell.

[41]  M. Rao,et al.  Characterization and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. , 2003, Cloning and stem cells.

[42]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Role of ERas in promoting tumour-like properties in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2003, Nature.

[43]  H. Ishikawa,et al.  New approach for the establishment of mouse early embryonic stem cells and induction of their differentiation. , 2001, Human cell.

[44]  A. Bowcock,et al.  Isolation of two novel WNT genes, WNT14 and WNT15, one of which (WNT15) is closely linked to WNT3 on human chromosome 17q21. , 1997, Genomics.

[45]  Robert D. Finn,et al.  The Pfam protein families database , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[46]  Xin Chen,et al.  The TRANSFAC system on gene expression regulation , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[47]  N. Corbi,et al.  Developmental-specific activity of the FGF-4 enhancer requires the synergistic action of Sox2 and Oct-3. , 1995, Genes & development.

[48]  C. O’Brien,et al.  Isolation and Characterization of the Human gp130 Promoter , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[49]  T. Möröy,et al.  Cloning of embryonal stem cell-specific genes: characterization of the transcriptionally controlled gene esg-1. , 1994, Cell growth & differentiation : the molecular biology journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[50]  C. Geserick,et al.  OTEX, an androgen-regulated human member of the paired-like class of homeobox genes. , 2002, The Biochemical journal.

[51]  V. Papaioannou,et al.  Paracrine action of FGF4 during periimplantation development maintains trophectoderm and primitive endoderm , 2003, Genesis.

[52]  H. Niwa,et al.  Identification of Sox-2 regulatory region which is under the control of Oct-3/4-Sox-2 complex. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[53]  H. Kondoh,et al.  Pax6 and SOX2 form a co-DNA-binding partner complex that regulates initiation of lens development. , 2001, Genes & development.

[54]  M. Rao,et al.  Toward cell replacement therapy: promises and caveats , 2003, Experimental Neurology.

[55]  Donald Metcalf,et al.  Myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor maintains the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells , 1988, Nature.

[56]  M. Kaufman,et al.  Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos , 1981, Nature.

[57]  I. Dusanter-Fourt,et al.  STAT5 and Oct-1 Form a Stable Complex That Modulates Cyclin D1 Expression , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[58]  E. Adamson,et al.  Nodal-dependent Cripto signaling promotes cardiomyogenesis and redirects the neural fate of embryonic stem cells , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[59]  H. Okamoto,et al.  Integration of multiple signal transducing pathways on Fgf response elements of the Xenopus caudal homologue Xcad3 , 2003, Development.

[60]  Yunhan Hong,et al.  Pluripotency and differentiation of embryonic stem cell lines from the medakafish (Oryzias latipes) , 1996, Mechanisms of Development.

[61]  J. Thomson,et al.  Pluripotent cell lines derived from common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) blastocysts. , 1996, Biology of reproduction.

[62]  A. Schier Nodal signaling in vertebrate development. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[63]  Matthias Wilmanns,et al.  Crystal structure of a POU/HMG/DNA ternary complex suggests differential assembly of Oct4 and Sox2 on two enhancers. , 2003, Genes & development.

[64]  Y. Cong,et al.  The human telomerase catalytic subunit hTERT: organization of the gene and characterization of the promoter. , 1999, Human molecular genetics.

[65]  G. Martin,et al.  Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  R. Foreman,et al.  Requirement for Foxd3 in maintaining pluripotent cells of the early mouse embryo. , 2002, Genes & development.

[67]  S. Temple Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal, Analyzed , 2003, Cell.

[68]  I. Khrebtukova,et al.  MPSS profiling of human embryonic stem cells , 2004, BMC Developmental Biology.

[69]  P. Greengard,et al.  Maintenance of pluripotency in human and mouse embryonic stem cells through activation of Wnt signaling by a pharmacological GSK-3-specific inhibitor , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[70]  A. Rizzino,et al.  Effects of differentiation on the transcriptional regulation of the FGF‐4 gene: Critical roles played by a distal enhancer , 1998, Molecular reproduction and development.

[71]  Michael Ruogu Zhang,et al.  Identification of protein coding regions in the human genome by quadratic discriminant analysis. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[72]  T. Misteli,et al.  Signalling , cell cycle and pluripotency in embryonic stem cells , 2002 .

[73]  A. Dierich,et al.  The Ribosomal S6 Kinases, cAMP-responsive Element-binding, and STAT3 Proteins Are Regulated by Different Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Signaling Pathways in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[74]  Akihiko Okuda,et al.  The Gene for the Embryonic Stem Cell Coactivator UTF1 Carries a Regulatory Element Which Selectively Interacts with a Complex Composed of Oct-3/4 and Sox-2 , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[75]  A. M. Gibbins,et al.  Apparent absence of oct 3/4 from the chicken genome , 2001, Molecular reproduction and development.