Does 1:1 Computing in a Junior High-School Change the Pedagogical Perspectives of Teachers and Their Educational Discourse?.

Transforming a school from traditional teaching and learning to a one-to-one (1:1) classroom, in which a teacher and students have personal digital devices, inevitably requires changes in the way the teacher addresses her role. This study examined the implications of integrating 1:1 computing on teachers’ pedagogical perceptions and the classroom’s educational discourse. A change in pedagogical perceptions during three years of teaching within this model was investigated. The research analyzed data from 14 teachers teaching in a junior high school in the north of Israel collected over the course of three years through interviews and lesson observations. The findings show that the 1:1 computing allows teachers to improve their teaching skills; however, it fails to change their fundamental attitudes in regard to teaching and learning processes. It was further found that the use of a laptop by each student does not significantly improve the classroom’s learning discourse. The computer is perceived as an individual or group learning technology rather than as a tool for conducting learning discourse. An analysis of the data collected shows a great contribution to collaboration among teachers in preparing technology-enhanced lessons. The findings are discussed in terms of Bruner’s (Olson & Bruner, 1996) “folk psychology” and “folk pedagogy” of teachers and “the new learning ecology” framework in 1:1 classroom (Lee, Spires, Wiebe, Hollebrands, & Young, 2015). One of the main recommendations of this research is to reflect on findings from the teaching staff and the school community emphasizing 1:1 technology as a tool for significant pedagogical change. It seems that the use of personal technology per se is not enough for pedagogical changes to take place; the change must begin with teachers’ perceptions and attitudes.

[1]  Montse Guitert,et al.  Teacher perceptions of the time factor in One Laptop per Child , 2013 .

[2]  A Middle School One-to-One Laptop Program: The Maine Experience , 2011 .

[3]  J. Wertsch Mind as action , 1998 .

[4]  Laura M. O’Dwyer,et al.  Special Edition: Educational Outcomes and Research from 1:1 Computing Settings , 2010 .

[5]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  Do Technologies Make Us Smarter? Intellectual Amplification With, Of, and Through Technology , 2005 .

[6]  Augusto Gnisci,et al.  A sequential analysis of classroom discourse in Italian primary schools: the many faces of the IRF pattern. , 2013, The British journal of educational psychology.

[7]  Larry Cuban Oversold and Underused , 2001 .

[8]  Paul W. Richardson The culture of education , 1996 .

[9]  R. Rogers An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education , 2011 .

[10]  John M. Downes,et al.  The Intersection between 1:1 Laptop Implementation and the Characteristics of Effective Middle Level Schools , 2015 .

[11]  Huang-Yao Hong,et al.  Schools as Knowledge-Building Organizations: Thirty Years of Design Research , 2016 .

[12]  Meredith J.C. Swallow,et al.  The Year-Two Decline: Exploring the Incremental Experiences of a 1:1 Technology Initiative , 2015 .

[13]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Teacher Technology Change , 2010 .

[14]  Ina Blau,et al.  e-Leadership of school principals: Increasing school effectiveness by a school data management system , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[15]  Nicholas C. Wilson,et al.  Interrogating the Divide: A Case Study of Student Technology Use in a One-to-one Laptop School , 2014, ICLS.

[16]  J. Sinclair,et al.  Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils , 1975 .

[17]  H. Turunen,et al.  Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. , 2013, Nursing & health sciences.

[18]  Damian Bebell,et al.  Cloud Computing: Short Term Impacts of 1:1 Computing in the Sixth Grade. , 2014 .

[19]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Meaningful Learning with Technology , 2007 .

[20]  Larry Cuban,et al.  High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox , 2001 .

[22]  Stanley H. Cohen,et al.  Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. , 1975 .

[23]  Adel T. Al-Bataineh,et al.  One to One Technology and Its Effect on Student Academic Achievement and Motivation. , 2015 .

[24]  Ina Blau,et al.  HOW THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TABLET COMPUTERS IMPACTS LEARNING AND PEDAGOGY AND PROMOTES “DIGITAL WISDOM” OF STUDENTS AND TEACHERS IN THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL? , 2014 .

[25]  Marcia Håkansson Lindqvist,et al.  Gaining and Sustaining TEL in a 1:1 Laptop Initiative: Possibilities and Challenges for Teachers and Students , 2015 .

[26]  Ina Blau Teachers for "Smart Classrooms": The Extent of Implementation of an Interactive Whiteboard- based Professional Development Program on Elementary Teachers' Instructional Practices , 2011 .

[27]  H. Mehan,et al.  Learning Lessons, Social Organization in the Classroom , 1979 .

[28]  Yigal Rosen,et al.  Intertwining Digital Content and a One-To-One Laptop Environment in Teaching and Learning , 2012 .

[29]  William R. Penuel,et al.  Implementation and Effects Of One-to-One Computing Initiatives , 2006 .

[30]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  Portraits Of One-To-One Learning Environments In A New Learning Ecology , 2015 .

[31]  Håkan Fleischer What is our current understanding of one-to-one computer projects: A systematic narrative research review , 2012 .

[32]  Michael Fullan,et al.  Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system reform , 2011 .

[33]  Ina Blau,et al.  Scaffolding game-based learning: Impact on learning achievements, perceived learning, and game experiences , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Ina Blau,et al.  Teacher-families online interactions and gender differences in parental involvement through school data system: Do mothers want to know more than fathers about their children? , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[35]  L. Ilomäki,et al.  The effects of ICT on school: teachers’ and students’ perspectives , 2008 .

[36]  Johan Lundin,et al.  Exploring the Relationship between Sanctioned and Unsanctioned Laptop Use in a 1: 1 Classroom , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[37]  Folk psychology, folk pedagogy, and their relations to subject-matter knowledge. , 2001 .

[38]  Damian Bebell,et al.  One to One Computing: A Summary of the Quantitative Results from the Berkshire Wireless Learning Initiative , 2010 .

[39]  Yehuda Peled,et al.  Technological, pedagogical and content knowledge in one-to-one classroom: teachers developing “digital wisdom” , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[40]  Avner Caspi,et al.  Collaboration and psychological ownership: how does the tension between the two influence perceived learning? , 2011 .

[41]  Courtney B. Cazden,et al.  Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Second Edition. , 2001 .

[42]  A. Daly,et al.  Relationships in reform: the role of teachers' social networks , 2010 .

[43]  M. Warschauer,et al.  One-to-one laptops in K-12 classrooms: voices of students , 2014 .

[44]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[45]  Ina Blau E-Collaboration Within, Between, and Without Institutions: Towards Better Functioning of Online Groups Through Networks , 2011, Int. J. e Collab..

[46]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[47]  Serena Triacca,et al.  Education technologies and teacher's professional development. The project Motus (Monitoring Tablet Utilization in School) run by CREMIT , 2014 .