Geometric features of coronary artery lesions favoring acute occlusion and myocardial infarction: a quantitative angiographic study.

OBJECTIVES We sought to identify the angiographic predictors of a future infarction, to study their interaction with time to infarction, patient risk factors and medications, and to evaluate their clinical utility for risk stratification. BACKGROUND Identification of coronary lesions at risk of acute occlusion remains challenging. Stenosis severity is poorly predictive but other stenosis descriptors might be better predictors. METHODS Eighty-four patients with an acute myocardial infarction and a coronary angiogram performed within the preceding 36 months (baseline angiogram), and after infarction were selected. All coronary stenoses (from 10% to 95% lumen diameter reduction) at baseline angiogram were analyzed by computer-assisted quantification. Each of the 84 lesions responsible for the infarction (culprit) was compared with the nonculprit stenoses (controls) in the same patient. RESULTS Culprit lesions were more symmetrical (symmetry index +15%; p < 0.001), had steeper outflow angles (maximal angle +4 degrees; p < 0.001), were more severe (percent stenosis +5%; p = 0.001) and longer (+ 1.5 mm, p = 0.01) than controls. The symmetry index and the outflow angles were the two independent predictors of infarction at three-year follow-up. Stenosis severity predicted only infarctions occurring within 1 year after angiography. In moderately severe stenoses (40% to 70% stenosis), stratification using the symmetry index and outflow angles accurately predicted lesions remaining free of occlusion and infarction at three-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Better characterization of stenosis geometry might help to understand the pathophysiologic mechanisms triggering coronary occlusion and to stratify patients for improved care.

[1]  T. Ryan Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  S. Vallabhajosula,et al.  Dynamic monitoring of platelet deposition on severely damaged vessel wall in flowing blood. Effects of different stenoses on thrombus growth. , 1990, Arteriosclerosis.

[3]  M. Bodenheimer,et al.  Bypass surgery for chronic stable angina: predictors of survival benefit and strategy for patient selection. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[4]  W. Koenig,et al.  The possible role of hemorheology in atherothrombogenesis. , 1992, Atherosclerosis.

[5]  Thomas J. Ryan,et al.  Guidelines for Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty) , 1993, Circulation.

[6]  V. Fuster,et al.  Coronary plaque disruption. , 1995, Circulation.

[7]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Quantitative Coronary Arteriography , 1991 .

[8]  D. Waters,et al.  Quantitative Angiographic Morphology of the Coronary Artery Lesions at Risk of Thrombotic Occlusion , 1992, Circulation.

[9]  D. Faxon,et al.  Five-year angiographic follow-up of factors associated with progression of coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). CASS Participating Investigators and Staff. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  V. Fuster,et al.  Effect of an Eccentric Severe Stenosis on Fibrin(ogen) Deposition on Severely Damaged Vessel Wall in Arterial Thrombosis: Relative Contribution of Fibrin(ogen) and Platelets , 1994, Circulation.

[11]  R. Kamm,et al.  Distribution of Circumferential Stress in Ruptured and Stable Atherosclerotic Lesions A Structural Analysis With Histopathological Correlation , 1993, Circulation.

[12]  J. Isner,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Reconstruction of Human Coronary and Peripheral Arteries From Images Recorded During Two‐Dimensional Intravascular Ultrasound Examination , 1991, Circulation.

[13]  M. Davies,et al.  Risk of thrombosis in human atherosclerotic plaques: role of extracellular lipid, macrophage, and smooth muscle cell content. , 1993, British heart journal.

[14]  T. Craven,et al.  Prognostic Significance of Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis , 1993, Circulation.

[15]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Quantitative coronary arteriography: equipment and technical requirements , 1993 .

[16]  V. Fuster,et al.  Angiographic evolution of coronary artery morphology in unstable angina. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Advances in Quantitative Coronary Arteriography , 1993, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[18]  A. Beaudoin,et al.  Analysis of shear stress and hemodynamic factors in a model of coronary artery stenosis and thrombosis. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[19]  F. Loop,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Circulation.

[20]  K. Mizuno,et al.  Angioscopic evaluation of coronary-artery thrombi in acute coronary syndromes. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  V. Fuster,et al.  Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  R T Schoephoerster,et al.  Effects of local geometry and fluid dynamics on regional platelet deposition on artificial surfaces. , 1993, Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology.

[23]  J. Reiber,et al.  A new approach for the quantification of complex lesion morphology: the gradient field transform; basic principles and validation results. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  J. Deckers,et al.  Anatomical Progression of Coronary Artery Disease in Humans as Seen by Prospective, Repeated, Quantitated Coronary Angiography: Relation to Clinical Events and Risk Factors , 1992, Circulation.

[25]  J. Isner,et al.  Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Human Coronary and Peripheral Arteries From Images Recorded During Two-Dimensional Intravascular Ultrasound Examination , 1991, Circulation.

[26]  B F Waller,et al.  The eccentric coronary atherosclerotic plaque: Morphologic observations and clinical relevance , 1989, Clinical cardiology.

[27]  W. Santamore,et al.  Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? , 1988, Circulation.

[28]  G. V. R. Born,et al.  INFLUENCE OF PLAQUE CONFIGURATION AND STRESS DISTRIBUTION ON FISSURING OF CORONARY ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUES , 1989, The Lancet.

[29]  P J de Feyter,et al.  Technologic considerations and practical limitations in the use of quantitative angiography during percutaneous coronary recanalization. , 1994, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[30]  Steven E. Nissen,et al.  Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment of Lumen Size and Wall Morphology in Normal Subjects and Patients With Coronary Artery Disease , 1991, Circulation.

[31]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Effect of stenosis geometry on the Doppler-catheter gradient relation in vitro: a manifestation of pressure recovery. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  H. Kennedy,et al.  Morphological and quantitative angiographic analyses of progression of coronary stenoses. A comparison of Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. , 1994, Circulation.