Mountain torrents: Quantifying vulnerability and assessing uncertainties

Vulnerability assessment for elements at risk is an important component in the framework of risk assessment. The vulnerability of buildings affected by torrent processes can be quantified by vulnerability functions that express a mathematical relationship between the degree of loss of individual elements at risk and the intensity of the impacting process. Based on data from the Austrian Alps, we extended a vulnerability curve for residential buildings affected by fluvial sediment transport processes to other torrent processes and other building types. With respect to this goal to merge different data based on different processes and building types, several statistical tests were conducted. The calculation of vulnerability functions was based on a nonlinear regression approach applying cumulative distribution functions. The results suggest that there is no need to distinguish between different sediment-laden torrent processes when assessing vulnerability of residential buildings towards torrent processes. The final vulnerability functions were further validated with data from the Italian Alps and different vulnerability functions presented in the literature. This comparison showed the wider applicability of the derived vulnerability functions. The uncertainty inherent to regression functions was quantified by the calculation of confidence bands. The derived vulnerability functions may be applied within the framework of risk management for mountain hazards within the European Alps. The method is transferable to other mountain regions if the input data needed are available.

[1]  John L. Innes,et al.  Recognition of debris flow, debris flood and flood hazard through watershed morphometrics , 2004 .

[2]  Suzanne Lacasse,et al.  A conceptual framework for quantitative estimation of physical vulnerability to landslides , 2008 .

[3]  O. Hungr,et al.  Landslide Risk Management , 2005 .

[4]  Sven Fuchs,et al.  A quantitative vulnerability function for fluvial sediment transport , 2011 .

[5]  M. Cowles,et al.  On the Origins of the .05 Level of Statistical Significance , 1982 .

[6]  David Alexander,et al.  Confronting Catastrophe: New Perspectives on Natural Disasters , 2000 .

[7]  Stephen M. Stigler,et al.  Fisher and the 5% Level , 2008 .

[8]  Johannes Hübl,et al.  TOWARDS A FREQUENCY-MAGNITUDE RELATIONSHIP FOR TORRENT EVENTS IN AUSTRIA , 2011 .

[9]  Sven Fuchs,et al.  Susceptibility versus resilience to mountain hazards in Austria - paradigms of vulnerability revisited , 2009 .

[10]  M. Jakob,et al.  Vulnerability of buildings to debris flow impact , 2011, Natural Hazards.

[11]  J. Knight,et al.  Climate change and geomorphological hazards in the eastern European Alps , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  B. Calvo,et al.  A real-world application of Monte Carlo procedure for debris flow risk assessment , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[13]  E. D. Haugen A.M. Kaynia.  Vulnerability of structures impacted by debris flow , 2008 .

[14]  Markus Holub,et al.  Mitigating mountain hazards in Austria – legislation, risk transfer, and awareness building , 2009 .

[15]  W. Z. Savage,et al.  Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning , 2008 .

[16]  Rudolf Sailer,et al.  Empirical Estimate Of Vulnerability RelationsFor Use In Snow Avalanche Risk Assessment , 2004 .

[17]  Roberto Santacroce,et al.  Characteristics of May 5–6, 1998 volcaniclastic debris flows in the Sarno area (Campania, southern Italy): relationships to structural damage and hazard zonation , 2004 .

[18]  John E. Costa,et al.  Physical Geomorphology of Debris Flows , 1984 .

[19]  É. Bardou.  Méthodologie de diagnostic des laves torrentielles sur un bassin versant alpin , 2002 .

[20]  Olav Slaymaker,et al.  The distinctive attributes of debris torrents , 1988 .

[21]  Ben Gouldby,et al.  Beyond the Factor of Safety: Developing Fragility Curves to Characterize System Reliability , 2010 .

[22]  Bruno Mazzorana,et al.  Towards dynamics in flood risk assessment , 2012 .

[23]  R. Sidle,et al.  The role of forests in reducing hydrogeomorphic hazards , 2006 .

[24]  Ting-Chi Tsao,et al.  Building vulnerability to debris flows in Taiwan: a preliminary study , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[25]  T. Glade,et al.  Improvement of vulnerability curves using data from extreme events: debris flow event in South Tyrol , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[26]  Hans Kienholz,et al.  Aspects of integral risk management in practice: Considerations with respect to mountain hazards in Switzerland , 2004 .

[27]  M. Jakob,et al.  Climate change effects on landslides along the southwest coast of British Columbia , 2009 .

[28]  Kaiheng Hu,et al.  Characteristics of damage to buildings by debris flows on 7 August 2010 in Zhouqu, Western China , 2012 .

[29]  Michael Bründl,et al.  Avalanche Hazard Mitigation Strategies Assessed by Cost Effectiveness Analyses and Cost Benefit Analyses—evidence from Davos, Switzerland , 2007 .

[30]  Paul T. Boggs,et al.  Sequential Quadratic Programming , 1995, Acta Numerica.

[31]  James P. Lewis,et al.  Natural Disasters and Vulnerability Analysis , 1981 .

[32]  Sven Fuchs,et al.  Mountain hazards: reducing vulnerability by adapted building design , 2012, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[33]  Christian Scheidl,et al.  Empirical prediction of debris‐flow mobility and deposition on fans , 2009 .

[34]  Margreth Keiler,et al.  Development of the damage potential resulting from avalanche risk in the period 1950-2000, case study Galtür , 2004 .

[35]  M. Jakob,et al.  Debris flood risk assessment for Mosquito Creek, British Columbia, Canada , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[36]  J. Hübl,et al.  Towards an empirical vulnerability function for use in debris flow risk assessment , 2007 .

[37]  J. N. Hutchinson,et al.  A review of the classification of landslides of the flow type , 2001 .

[38]  I N Bronstein,et al.  Taschenbuch der Mathematik , 1966 .

[39]  Thomas Glade,et al.  Quantitative risk analysis for landslides ‒ Examples from Bíldudalur, NW-Iceland , 2004 .

[40]  Hugo Ledoux,et al.  An Efficient Natural Neighbour Interpolation Algorithm for Geoscientific Modelling , 2004, SDH.

[41]  Sven Fuchs,et al.  Editorial for the special issue: vulnerability to natural hazards—the challenge of integration , 2011 .

[42]  C. J. van Westen,et al.  The application of numerical debris flow modelling for the generation of physical vulnerability curves , 2011 .

[43]  Sven Fuchs,et al.  Spatial scan statistics in vulnerability assessment: an application to mountain hazards , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[44]  Vincenzo D'Agostino,et al.  Hydrogeomorphic processes and torrent control works on a large alluvial fan in the eastern Italian Alps , 2010 .