Evaluation of response characteristics of resistive oxygen sensors based on porous cerium oxide thick film using pressure modulation method

Abstract In order to reduce the response time of resistive oxygen sensors using porous cerium oxide thick film, it is important to ascertain the factors controlling response. Pressure modulation method (PMM) was used to find the rate-limiting step of sensor response. This useful method measures the amplitude of sensor output (H(f)) for the sine wave modulation of oxygen partial pressure at constant frequency (f). In PMM, “break” response time, which is minimum period in which the sensor responds precisely, can be measured. Three points were examined: (1) simulated calculations of PMM were carried out using a model of porous thick film in which spherical particles are connected in a three-dimensional network; (2) sensor response speed was experimentally measured using PMM; and (3) the diffusion coefficient and surface reaction coefficient were estimated by comparison between experiment and calculation. The plot of log f versus log H(f) in the high f region was found to have a slope of approximately −0.5 for both porous thick film and non-porous thin film, when the rate-limiting step was diffusion. Calculations showed the response time of porous thick film was 1/20 that of non-porous thin film when the grain diameter of the porous thick film was the same as the thickness of non-porous thin film. At 973 K, “break” response time (tb) of the resistive oxygen sensor was found by experiment to be 109 ms. It was concluded that the response of the resistive oxygen sensor prepared in this study was strongly controlled by diffusion at 923–1023 K, since the experiment revealed that the slope of plot of log f versus log H(f) in the high f region was approximately −0.5. At 923–1023 K, the diffusion coefficient of oxygen vacancy in porous ceria (DV) was expressed as follows: DV (m2s−1) = 5.78 × 10−4 exp(−1.94 eV/kT). At 1023 K, the surface reaction coefficient (K) was found to exceed 10−4 m/s.

[1]  H. Meixner,et al.  Fast gas sensors based on metal oxides which are stable at high temperatures , 1997 .

[2]  Ellen Ivers-Tiffée,et al.  Principles of solid state oxygen sensors for lean combustion gas control , 2001 .

[3]  Johann Riegel,et al.  Exhaust gas sensors for automotive emission control , 2002 .

[4]  C. Tragut,et al.  The influence of the surface transfer reaction on the response characteristics of resistive oxygen sensors , 1992 .

[5]  Ichiro Matsubara,et al.  Kinetic behavior of resistive oxygen sensor using cerium oxide , 2004 .

[6]  Ichiro Matsubara,et al.  Millisecond-order response measurement for fast oxygen gas sensors , 2004 .

[7]  E. Shimada,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Oxygen Diffusion and Surface Exchange Reaction in Cerium Oxide , 2000 .

[8]  W. Shin,et al.  Numerical analysis of response time for resistive oxygen gas sensors , 2002 .

[9]  W. Shin,et al.  Fast response of resistive-type oxygen gas sensors based on nano-sized ceria powder , 2003 .

[10]  K. Härdtl,et al.  Kinetic behaviour of resistive oxygen sensors , 1991 .

[11]  Ichiro Matsubara,et al.  Resistive Oxygen Gas Sensors Using Ceria-Zirconia Thick Films , 2004 .

[12]  Ralf Moos,et al.  Temperature-independent resistive oxygen exhaust gas sensor for lean-burn engines in thick-film technology , 2003 .

[13]  Jeff Leon Kainz,et al.  Individual Cylinder Fuel Control with a Switching Oxygen Sensor , 1999 .

[14]  Wolfgang Göpel,et al.  Frequency response study of the kinetic behaviour of nernstian solid-electrolyte gas sensors by pressure modulation , 1994 .