Effect of Different Wax Pattern Manufacturing Techniques on the Marginal Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns

Purpose: The present study evaluated the marginal gap of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated through three different wax pattern techniques; Conventional, Milling and 3D-printing. Materials and Methods: Thirty stone models were replicated from a stainless-steel model representing a prepared tooth; ten were sent to make conventional wax patterns while the remaining were sent to a digital dental scanner. The computer aided design was completed and STL (Standard Tessellation Language) files were sent to either milling or 3D-printing machines. All wax patterns (n = 30) were pressed, and a stabilizing instrument was used to secure the crowns on the master model. The marginal gap was measured at 18 points for each crown using a digital microscope (µm) (n = 540) and compared using One-way ANOVA (p ≤ 0.05). Results: There was a significant difference in the marginal gap value between all three groups (p < 0.01) where the milled group showed the least mean gap (28.87 ± 30.18 µm), followed by 3D printed (47.85 ± 27.44 µm), while the highest mean marginal gap was found in the conventional group (63.49 ± 28.05 µm). Conclusion: Milled and 3D-printed wax patterns produced better fitting crowns compared to conventional techniques.

[1]  Yeganeh Memari,et al.  Marginal Adaptation of CAD/CAM All‐Ceramic Crowns Made by Different Impression Methods: A Literature Review , 2019, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[2]  S. Papadiochou,et al.  Marginal adaptation and CAD‐CAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques , 2017, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  Rola Mortada,et al.  Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD‐CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study , 2017, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  Rola Mortada,et al.  Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  Irena Sailer,et al.  All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). , 2015, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  C. Wyatt,et al.  A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  J. Katsoulis,et al.  Clinical outcome of single porcelain-fused-to-zirconium dioxide crowns: a systematic review. , 2013, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  M. Vojdani,et al.  Comparison the Marginal and Internal Fit of Metal Copings Cast from Wax Patterns Fabricated by CAD/CAM and Conventional Wax up Techniques , 2013, Journal of dentistry.

[9]  Walter Renne,et al.  Predicting marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns based on the presence or absence of common preparation errors. , 2012, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  A. Keshvad,et al.  Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques. , 2011, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[11]  T Miyazaki,et al.  CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. , 2011, Australian dental journal.

[12]  R. Ritter Multifunctional uses of a novel ceramic-lithium disilicate. , 2010, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[13]  Jan W V van Dijken,et al.  A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin-enamel-bonded pressed ceramic coverages. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  Daniel Edelhoff,et al.  Effect of preparation angles on the precision of zirconia crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM system. , 2008, Dental materials journal.

[15]  K. Hiller,et al.  Retrospective clinical study and survival analysis on partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years , 2000, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[16]  H Denissen,et al.  Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  J. A. Stackhouse,et al.  Dimensional changes of elastomers during cold sterilization. , 1987, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  V. Merchant,et al.  Dimensional stability of dental impressions after immersion disinfection. , 1986, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[19]  R Grajower,et al.  Fit of crown wax patterns after removal from the die. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  J. Mclean,et al.  The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique , 1971, British Dental Journal.

[21]  Stig Karlsson,et al.  Fit of a new pressure-sintered zirconium dioxide coping. , 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[22]  J. Mclean,et al.  Evolution of dental ceramics in the twentieth century. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[23]  L C Breeding,et al.  The effect of custom tray material type and adhesive drying time on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system. , 1994, The International journal of prosthodontics.