The Effect of the Instrumental Training Contingency on Susceptibility to Reinforcer Devaluation

Two experiments investigated performance of instrumental lever pressing by rats following post-conditioning devaluation of the sucrose reinforcer produced by establishing an aversion to it. In Experiment I rats responded less in an extinction test after being averted from the sucrose following training on a ratio schedule, but not following an equivalent amount of training on an interval schedule. This was true even though the devalued sucrose would not act as an effective reinforcer on either the ratio or interval schedule. Experiment II provided a further investigation of the insensitivity of interval responding to reinforcer devaluation by comparing test performance under simple extinction with responding when the devalued reinforcer was presented on either a response-contingent or non-contingent schedule during the test. Once again simple extinction performance was unaffected by prior reinforcer devaluation. Furthermore, neither non-contingent nor contingent presentations of the devalued reinforcer significantly depressed responding below the level seen in the extinction condition. Ratio, but not interval performance appears to be controlled by knowledge about the instrumental contingency that encodes specific properties of the training reinforcer.

[1]  W. W. Rozeboom What is learned? An empirical enigma. , 1958, Psychological review.

[2]  David R. Williams The structure of response rate. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  E. E. Krieckhaus,et al.  Acquisition of sodium by rats: interaction of innate mechanisms and latent learning. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[4]  R. Kovner,et al.  Cue properties vs palatability of flavors in avoidance learning , 1970 .

[5]  G. Morrison,et al.  Taste-mediated conditioned aversion to an exteroceptive stimulus following LiCl poisoning. , 1974, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[6]  N. Mackintosh The psychology of animal learning , 1974 .

[7]  E. Holman Some conditions for the dissociation of consummatory and instrumental behavior in rats , 1975 .

[8]  T. J. Matthews,et al.  Yoked variable-ratio and variable-interval responding in pigeons. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  S. Woods,et al.  Iron appetite and latent learning in rats , 1977, Physiology & Behavior.

[10]  Barbara Burkhard,et al.  The temporal triangle: Response substitution in instrumental conditioning , 1978 .

[11]  P. Holland,et al.  Differential effects of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after Pavlovian appetitive conditioning. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[12]  J. Staddon Operant behavior as adaptation to constraint. , 1979 .

[13]  Luke Jones Taste aversion conditioning and t-maze behaviour , 1980 .

[14]  A. Amsel,et al.  Recall (versus recognition) of taste and immunization against aversive taste anticipations based on illness. , 1980, Science.

[15]  Christopher D. Adams Post-Conditioning Devaluation of an Instrumental Reinforcer has no Effect on Extinction Performance , 1980 .

[16]  Christopher D. Adams,et al.  Instrumental Responding following Reinforcer Devaluation , 1981 .

[17]  J. E. Sherman,et al.  Aversion to the reinforcer differentially affects conditioned reinforcement and instrumental responding. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[18]  Christopher D. Adams Variations in the Sensitivity of Instrumental Responding to Reinforcer Devaluation , 1982 .