The value of acute toxicity studies to support the clinical management of overdose and poisoning: a cross-discipline consensus.

Acute toxicity studies are no longer required to support first clinical trials of pharmaceuticals in man. However, it is unclear in the wording of the revised ICH M3 whether acute toxicity studies are required later in drug development (e.g., phase 3) in order to support the management of overdose. The NC3Rs held a workshop in January 2010 with representatives from international poison centres, the pharmaceutical and chemical industries, and regulatory and government bodies to explore further whether acute toxicity studies are used to support the clinical management of overdose of pharmaceuticals and whether this work can be translated to other sectors such as the chemical industry. The consensus formed at the workshop was that acute toxicity studies are not used for managing overdose of pharmaceuticals and are of little value in treating human poisoning from chemicals. In this paper, the authors describe the key considerations in treating human overdose and poisoning, challenge the value of the classification and labelling process of chemicals for this purpose and discuss how acute toxicity studies can be improved to better inform risk assessment.

[1]  Sally Robinson,et al.  Are acute toxicity studies required to support overdose for new medicines? , 2009, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[2]  D. Lorke A new approach to practical acute toxicity testing , 1983, Archives of Toxicology.

[3]  Sally Robinson,et al.  A European pharmaceutical company initiative challenging the regulatory requirement for acute toxicity studies in pharmaceutical drug development. , 2008, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[4]  J. Abraham The international conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use , 2009 .

[5]  Sally Robinson,et al.  Cross-Sector Review of Drivers and Available 3Rs Approaches for Acute Systemic Toxicity Testing , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[6]  J. Peter,et al.  Is there a relationship between the WHO hazard classification of organophosphate pesticide and outcomes in suicidal human poisoning with commercial organophosphate formulations? , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[7]  S. Creton,et al.  A new sighting study for the fixed concentration procedure to allow for gender differences , 2011, Human & experimental toxicology.

[8]  D. Gunnell,et al.  Deaths from pesticide poisoning: a global response , 2006, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[9]  Ian Indans,et al.  Acute toxicity testing of chemicals—Opportunities to avoid redundant testing and use alternative approaches , 2010, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[10]  G. Zbinden,et al.  Significance of the LD50-test for the toxicological evaluation of chemical substances , 1981, Archives of Toxicology.

[11]  David Gunnell,et al.  The global distribution of fatal pesticide self-poisoning: Systematic review , 2007, BMC public health.

[12]  N. Buckley,et al.  Differences between organophosphorus insecticides in human self-poisoning: a prospective cohort study , 2005, The Lancet.