Business‐driven policy optimization for service management

The performance of services offered by network operators has a direct impact on its reputation, on its revenue due to new customer subscriptions, and also on penalties that can apply when services are not provided to an acceptable quality level. Previous research on business-oriented network and service optimization has mainly focused on optimizing individual business indicators, such as profit and revenue, in isolation without analyzing the effect on network configurations and the subsequent impact on other indicators. Given that different business objectives are usually incompatible, a single network configuration cannot optimize them simultaneously. Determining the configuration and the associated trade-offs that satisfy multiple objectives is a complex task. This paper addresses this gap and presents a framework that derives policy configurations that optimize the business value of the network infrastructure. We describe a methodology to quantify business functions considering the dynamics of network events, the dynamics of end-user service usage, the nature of the business indicators, and their relationships with the underlying control methods. The proposed approach addresses the complexity of the target problem through a surrogate-based optimization approach properly tailored to match our application domain needs. We evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach through experimentation in a simulation environment we developed over OPNET. Copyright © 2015John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Changpeng Fan,et al.  Traffic engineering supported by Inherent Network Management: analysis of resource efficiency and cost saving potential , 2011, Int. J. Netw. Manag..

[2]  Vladimir Tosic,et al.  Autonomic Business-Driven Dynamic Adaptation of Service-Oriented Systems and the WSPolicy4MASC Support for Such Adaptation , 2010, Int. J. Syst. Serv. Oriented Eng..

[3]  Haochen Li,et al.  Bussiness-driven automatic IT change management based on machine learning , 2012, 2012 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium.

[4]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  g-dominance: Reference point based dominance for multiobjective metaheuristics , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Liang Shi,et al.  Multiobjective GA optimization using reduced models , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[6]  Raouf Boutaba,et al.  On Leveraging Policy-Based Management for Maximizing Business Profit , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management.

[7]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[8]  George Pavlou,et al.  A policy-based quality of service management system for IP DiffServ networks , 2002, IEEE Netw..

[9]  Yonggui Wang,et al.  An Integrated Framework for Service Quality, Customer Value, Satisfaction: Evidence from China's Telecommunication Industry , 2004, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[10]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Multi-Objective Optimization Using Surrogates , 2010 .

[11]  R. H. Myers Classical and modern regression with applications , 1986 .

[12]  R. L. Hardy Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces , 1971 .

[13]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[14]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[15]  Luca Foschini,et al.  Adaptive and business-driven service placement in federated Cloud computing environments , 2013, 2013 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM 2013).

[16]  Gregorio Toscano-Pulido,et al.  A study of surrogate models for their use in multiobjective evolutionary algorithms , 2011, 2011 8th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control.

[17]  Claudio Bartolini,et al.  Business Driven Prioritization of Service Incidents , 2004, DSOM.

[18]  Paris Flegkas,et al.  A Functional Solution for Goal-Ooriented Policy Refinement , 2006, Seventh IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY'06).

[19]  Michael T. M. Emmerich,et al.  Single- and multiobjective evolutionary optimization assisted by Gaussian random field metamodels , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[20]  WangYonggui,et al.  An Integrated Framework for Service Quality, Customer Value, Satisfaction , 2004 .

[21]  Mikkel Thorup,et al.  Traffic engineering with traditional IP routing protocols , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[22]  Paris Flegkas,et al.  Policy conflict analysis for diffserv quality of service management , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management.

[23]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems , 2002, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[24]  R. Boutaba,et al.  Assessing Network Service Profitability: Modeling From Market Science Perspective , 2007, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[25]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[26]  Patrick Maillé,et al.  Technological investment games among wireless telecommunications service providers , 2011, Int. J. Netw. Manag..

[27]  George Pavlou,et al.  Admission control for providing QoS in DiffServ IP networks: the TEQUILA approach , 2003, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[28]  Cesare Stefanelli,et al.  Potential benefits and challenges of closed-loop optimization processes for IT support organizations , 2012, 2012 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium.

[29]  Paris Flegkas,et al.  A methodological approach toward the refinement problem in policy-based management systems , 2006 .

[30]  Vladimir Tosic,et al.  MiniMASC: A Framework for Diverse Autonomic Adaptations of Web Service Compositions , 2010, 2010 7th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing and 7th International Conference on Autonomic & Trusted Computing.

[31]  Henry P. Wynn,et al.  [Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments]: Rejoinder , 1989 .

[32]  Brendan Jennings,et al.  The policy continuum-Policy authoring and conflict analysis , 2008, Comput. Commun..

[33]  George Pavlou,et al.  Policy refinement for IP differentiated services Quality of Service management , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management.

[34]  Raouf Boutaba,et al.  Business-driven management of differentiated services , 2010, 2010 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium - NOMS 2010.

[35]  R. K. Ursem Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2009 .

[36]  Charles Gide,et al.  Cours d'économie politique , 1911 .

[37]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[38]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A Fast Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimisation: NSGA-II , 2000, PPSN.

[39]  Yiwei Thomas Hou,et al.  Service overlay networks: SLAs, QoS, and bandwidth provisioning , 2003, TNET.

[40]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[41]  Joshua D. Knowles,et al.  ParEGO: a hybrid algorithm with on-line landscape approximation for expensive multiobjective optimization problems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[42]  Vladimir Tosic,et al.  Support for concurrent adaptation of multiple Web service compositions to maximize business metrics , 2011, 12th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM 2011) and Workshops.

[43]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .