Survey of Doctors' Experience of Patients Using the Internet

Background There have been many studies showing the variable quality of Internet health information and it has often been assumed that patients will blindly follow this and frequently come to harm. There have also been reports of problems for doctors and health services following patient Internet use, but their frequency has not been quantified. However, there have been no large, rigorous surveys of the perceptions of Internet-aware doctors about the actual benefits and harms to their patients of using the Internet. Objective To describe Internet-literate doctors' experiences of their patients' use of the Internet and resulting benefits and problems. Methods Online survey to a group of 800 Web-using doctors (members of a UK medical Internet service provider, Medix) in September and October 2001. Results Responses were received from 748 (94%) doctors, including 375 general practitioners (50%). Respondents estimated that 1%-2% of their patients used the Internet for health information in the past month with no regional variation. Over two thirds of the doctors considered Internet health information to be usually (20%) or sometimes (48%) reliable; this was higher in those recently qualified. Twice as many reported patients experiencing benefits (85%; 95% confidence interval, 80%-90%) than problems (44%; 95% confidence interval, 37%-50%) from the Internet. Patients gaining actual physical benefits from Internet use were reported by 40% of respondents, while 8% reported physical harm. Patients' overall experiences with the Internet were judged excellent 1%, good 29%, neutral 62%, poor 9%, or bad <1%. Turning to the impact of patient Internet use on the doctors themselves, 13% reported no problems, 38% 1 problem, and 49% 2 or more problems. Conversely, 20% reported no benefits for themselves, 49% 1 benefit, and 21% 2 or more benefits. Conclusions These doctors reported patient benefits from Internet use much more often than harms, but there were more problems than benefits for the doctors themselves. Reported estimates of patient Internet usage rates were low. Overall, this survey suggests that patients are deriving considerable benefits from using the Internet and that some of the claimed risks seem to have been exaggerated.

[1]  Trevor Jackson Website of the week: Bioterrorism , 2001 .

[2]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Rapid Responses , 2022 .

[3]  Douglas Carnall NHS Direct Online , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  R Smith Medical editor lambasts journals and editors , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  R Roberts,et al.  Verifying quality and safety in health informatics services , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Robert Varnam,et al.  “That's very nice, but will it get me pregnant?” , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Steven Wilson,et al.  Impact of the Internet on Primary Care Staff in Glasgow , 1999, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  J K Aronson,et al.  Autopathography: the patient's tale , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Anthony C. Davison,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 1998 .

[10]  D. Braunholtz,et al.  Quinacrine in possible or probable CJD , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  G Eysenbach,et al.  Online prescriptions of pharmaceuticals: Where is the evidence for harm or for benefit? A call for papers - and for reflection , 2001, Journal of medical Internet research.

[12]  Christian Köhler,et al.  Does the internet harm health? Database of adverse events related to the internet has been set up. , 2002, BMJ.

[13]  6. Information for patients , 2000 .

[14]  M. Hardey Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise , 1999 .

[15]  R Dobson Internet sites may encourage suicide , 1999, BMJ.

[16]  R. Smith Almost no evidence exists that the internet harms health. , 2001, BMJ.

[17]  Robert Kiley,et al.  Does the internet harm health? , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  G. Eysenbach,et al.  Cybermedicine. Interview by Clare Thompson. , 1999, BMJ.