Automatic stent strut detection in intravascular OCT images using image processing and classification technique

Intravascular OCT (iOCT) is an imaging modality with ideal resolution and contrast to provide accurate in vivo assessments of tissue healing following stent implantation. Our Cardiovascular Imaging Core Laboratory has served >20 international stent clinical trials with >2000 stents analyzed. Each stent requires 6-16hrs of manual analysis time and we are developing highly automated software to reduce this extreme effort. Using classification technique, physically meaningful image features, forward feature selection to limit overtraining, and leave-one-stent-out cross validation, we detected stent struts. To determine tissue coverage areas, we estimated stent “contours” by fitting detected struts and interpolation points from linearly interpolated tissue depths to a periodic cubic spline. Tissue coverage area was obtained by subtracting lumen area from the stent area. Detection was compared against manual analysis of 40 pullbacks. We obtained recall = 90±3% and precision = 89±6%. When taking struts deemed not bright enough for manual analysis into consideration, precision improved to 94±6%. This approached inter-observer variability (recall = 93%, precision = 96%). Differences in stent and tissue coverage areas are 0.12 ± 0.41 mm2 and 0.09 ± 0.42 mm2, respectively. We are developing software which will enable visualization, review, and editing of automated results, so as to provide a comprehensive stent analysis package. This should enable better and cheaper stent clinical trials, so that manufacturers can optimize the myriad of parameters (drug, coverage, bioresorbable versus metal, etc.) for stent design.

[1]  W. Desmet,et al.  Automatic segmentation of in-vivo intra-coronary optical coherence tomography images to assess stent strut apposition and coverage , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[2]  N. Y. Graham Smoothing with periodic cubic splines , 1983, The Bell System Technical Journal.

[3]  Satoko Tahara,et al.  Optical coherence tomography endpoints in stent clinical investigations: strut coverage , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[4]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[5]  Claude Kauffmann,et al.  In Vivo Supervised Analysis of Stent Reendothelialization From Optical Coherence Tomography , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  P. Bühlmann,et al.  Analyzing Bagging , 2001 .

[7]  A. Rollins,et al.  Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: a comprehensive review clinical and research applications. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[8]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications , 2003 .

[9]  Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Optical coherence tomography assessment of in vivo vascular response after implantation of overlapping bare-metal and drug-eluting stents. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[10]  Gozde Unal,et al.  Stent implant follow-up in intravascular optical coherence tomography images , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[11]  David L Wilson,et al.  Semiautomatic segmentation and quantification of calcified plaques in intracoronary optical coherence tomography images. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[12]  E. T. Y. Lee,et al.  Choosing nodes in parametric curve interpolation , 1989 .

[13]  Jennifer K Barton,et al.  An automatic algorithm for detecting stent endothelialization from volumetric optical coherence tomography datasets , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.