Spanning Cultural and Geographic Barriers with Knowledge Pipelines in Multinational Communities of Practice

AbstractMultinational construction and engineering companies are increasingly adopting communities of practice (COPs), as a means to encourage geographically dispersed and culturally diverse professionals to share knowledge on a global basis. If successful, these COPs form rich, knowledge sharing networks; they mobilize a company’s global knowledge base, allowing expertise to be applied when and where it is needed with relatively little managerial oversight. Conversely, geographic and cultural silos within COPs may form due to homophily, the social tendency of individuals to connect with similar others. These silos limit knowledge flows and curb the strategic advantage of a global workforce. Through empirical analysis of social network questionnaires and semistructured interviews, the research reported in this paper analyzed network patterns within three COPs to determine if geographic and cultural silos exist, identify structural patterns that defy homophilous trends, and explore why these network-level ...

[1]  Martine R. Haas,et al.  Acquiring and Applying Knowledge in Transnational Teams: The Roles of Cosmopolitans and Locals , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[2]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Tie and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Work , 2004 .

[3]  Jacob L. Moreno,et al.  The Sociometry Reader. , 1961 .

[4]  Adam M. Kleinbaum,et al.  Discretion Within Constraint: Homophily and Structure in a Formal Organization , 2012 .

[5]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[6]  H. Saint‐Onge,et al.  Leveraging Communities of Practice for Strategic Advantage , 2002 .

[7]  S. Boorman,et al.  Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions , 1976, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[9]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[10]  Joanne Roberts Limits to Communities of Practice , 2006 .

[11]  Jonathon N. Cummings Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[12]  John E. Taylor,et al.  The impact of cultural boundary spanners on global project network performance , 2011 .

[13]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Emergence and Role of Cultural Boundary Spanners in Global Engineering Project Networks , 2010 .

[14]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[15]  W. M. Bowler,et al.  The Hidden Power of Social Networks , 2004 .

[16]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[17]  Peyman Akhavan,et al.  Exploring the Failure Factors of Implementing Knowledge Management System in the Organizations , 2012 .

[18]  Robin I. M. Dunbar Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. , 1987 .

[20]  Gilbert Probst,et al.  Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail , 2008 .

[21]  A. Amin,et al.  Community, economic creativity, and organization , 2008 .

[22]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams , 2007, MIS Q..

[23]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[24]  Pei-Lun Chang,et al.  Is the Knowledge Management System Truly Cost Effective? Case Study of KM-Enabled Engineering Problem Solving , 2013 .

[25]  Andrew Parker,et al.  The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations , 2004 .

[26]  B. Efron The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans , 1987 .

[27]  L. Lindkvist Knowledge Communities and Knowledge Collectivities: A Typology of Knowledge Work in Groups , 2005 .

[28]  Amy Javernick-Will,et al.  Knowledge-sharing connections across geographical boundaries in global intra-firm networks , 2011 .

[29]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[30]  Amy Javernick-Will,et al.  Internal governance of design and engineering: the case of the multinational firm , 2012 .

[31]  Paul Chinowsky,et al.  Networks in engineering: an emerging approach to project organization studies , 2012 .

[32]  Amjad El-Tayeh,et al.  Using Digital Socialization to Support Geographically Dispersed AEC Project Teams , 2007 .

[33]  B. Efron,et al.  The Jackknife: The Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. , 1983 .

[34]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[35]  Frank E. Jones,et al.  The Sociometry Reader , 1961 .

[36]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[37]  Chris Kimble,et al.  Communities of Practice: Going One Step Too Far? , 2004 .

[38]  J. Moody Race, School Integration, and Friendship Segregation in America1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.