Intensity Characteristics of the Noctuid Acoustic Receptor

Spiking activity of the more sensitive acoustic receptor is described as a function of stimulus intensity. The form of the intensity characteristic depends strongly on stimulus duration. For very brief stimuli, the integral of stimulus power over stimulus duration determines the effectiveness. No response saturation is observed. With longer stimuli (50 msec), a steady firing rate is elicited. The response extends from the spontaneous rate of 20–40 spikes/sec to a saturated firing rate of nearly 700 spikes/sec. The characteristic is monotonic over more than 50 db in stimulus intensity. With very long stimuli (10 sec), the characteristics are nonmonotonic. Firing rates late in the stimulus decrease in response to an increase in stimulus intensity. The non-monotonic characteristics are attributed to intensity-related changes in response adaptation.

[1]  J. Pringle,et al.  Proprioception In Insects , 1938 .

[2]  K. D. Roeder,et al.  Ultrasonic reception by the tympanic organ of noctuid moths. , 1957, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[3]  M. Fuortes,et al.  Electric activity of cells in the eye of Limulus. , 1958, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  K. D. Roeder,et al.  A nervous element of unknown function in the tympanic organs of moths , 1959 .

[5]  K. D. Roeder,et al.  The detection and evasion of bats by moths , 1961 .

[6]  N. Suga.  Functional organization of two tympanic neurons in noctuid moths. , 1961, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[7]  W. Loewenstein,et al.  EXCITATION AND INACTIVATION IN A RECEPTOR MEMBRANE * , 1961, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  K. D. Roeder.  The behaviour of free flying moths in the presence of artificial ultrasonic pulses , 1962 .

[9]  C. Terzuolo,et al.  Relation between stimulus strength, generator potential and impulse frequency in stretch receptor of Crustacea. , 1962, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  S. Nakajima.  Adaptation in Stretch Receptor Neurons of Crayfish , 1964, Science.

[11]  W. Loewenstein.  Facets of a transducer process. , 1965, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[12]  H. Grundfest.  Electrophysiology and pharmacology of different components of bioelectric transducers. , 1965, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[13]  K. D. Roeder.  Acoustic sensitivity of the noctuid tympanic organ and its range for the cries of bats. , 1966, Journal of insect physiology.

[14]  K. D. Roeder,et al.  Acoustic orientation of a moth in flight by means of two sense cells. , 1966, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[15]  K. D. Roeder.  Turning tendency of moths exposed to ultrasound while in stationary flight , 1967 .

[16]  N. Y. S. Kiang,et al.  Discharge Rates of Single Auditory‐Nerve Fibers as Functions of Tone Level , 1969 .

[17]  H. Ghiradella.  Fine structure of the noctuid moth ear. I. The transducer area and connections to the tympanic membrane in Feltia subgothica haworth , 1971, Journal of morphology.