Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition

Imageability and age of acquisition (AoA) effects, as well as key interactions between these variables and frequency and consistency, were examined via multiple regression analyses for 1,936 disyllabic words, using reaction time and accuracy measures from the English Lexicon Project. Both imageability and AoA accounted for unique variance in lexical decision and naming reaction time performance. In addition, across both tasks, AoA and imageability effects were larger for low-frequency words than high-frequency words, and imageability effects were larger for later acquired than earlier acquired words. In reading aloud, consistency effects in reaction time were larger for later acquired words than earlier acquired words, but consistency did not interact with imageability in the reaction time analysis. These results provide further evidence that multisyllabic word recognition is similar to monosyllabic word recognition and indicate that AoA and imageability are valid predictors of word recognition performance. In addition, the results indicate that meaning exerts a larger influence in the reading aloud of multisyllabic words than monosyllabic words. Finally, parallel-distributed-processing approaches provide a useful theoretical framework to explain the main effects and interactions.

[1]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words , 2012, Behavior research methods.

[2]  Matthew A Lambon Ralph,et al.  What’s in a word? A parametric study of semantic influences on visual word recognition , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[3]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms? , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Padraic Monaghan,et al.  Modeling reading development: Cumulative, incremental learning in a computational model of word naming , 2010 .

[5]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[7]  D. Balota,et al.  Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words , 2009 .

[8]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Age of acquisition ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[10]  T. C. Lorsbach,et al.  Automatic semantic feedback during visual word recognition , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Gert Storms,et al.  Word associations: Network and semantic properties , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[12]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[13]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.

[15]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence: Empirical and computational evidence , 2006 .

[16]  R. Johnston,et al.  Age of acquisition and lexical processing , 2006 .

[17]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Differing neuropsychological and neuroanatomical correlates of abnormal reading in early-stage semantic dementia and dementia of the Alzheimer type , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  A. Woollams,et al.  Imageability and ambiguity effects in speeded naming: convergence and divergence. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  David A. Medler,et al.  Distinct Brain Systems for Processing Concrete and Abstract Concepts , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Isabel Lacruz,et al.  Feedforward and Feedback Consistency Effects for High- and Low-Frequency Words in Lexical Decision and Naming , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[25]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Christopher Barry,et al.  The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks : A never ending story ? , 2004 .

[27]  Dan Chateau,et al.  Spelling–sound consistency effects in disyllabic word naming , 2003 .

[28]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Age of Acquisition Effects in Word Reading and Other Tasks , 2002 .

[29]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  On the complexities of measuring naming. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  A. Biemiller,et al.  Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. , 2001 .

[31]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[32]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Regularity effects in word naming: What are they? , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[33]  K I Forster,et al.  The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[34]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Age-of-acquisition and frequency effects in speeded word naming , 1999, Cognition.

[36]  C M Herdman,et al.  Imageability effects in word naming: an individual differences analysis. , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[37]  S. Gerhand,et al.  Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[38]  Michael J. Cortese,et al.  Revisiting Serial Position Effects in Reading , 1998 .

[39]  Curt Burgess,et al.  The effect of corpus size in predicting reaction time in a basic word recognition task: Moving on from Kučera and Francis , 1998 .

[40]  David A. Balota,et al.  The Utility of Item-Level Analyses in Model Evaluation: A Reply to Seidenberg and Plaut , 1998 .

[41]  David A. Balota,et al.  Bringing Computational Models of Word Naming Down to the Item Level , 1997 .

[42]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Effects of association and imageability on phonological mapping , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  B. Weekes Differential Effects of Number of Letters on Word and Nonword Naming Latency , 1997 .

[44]  Debra Jared,et al.  Spelling-Sound Consistency Affects the Naming of High-Frequency Words , 1997 .

[45]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic effects in single-word naming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study of , 1993 .

[47]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[48]  Veronika Coltheart,et al.  Effects of word imageability and age of acquisition on children's reading , 1988 .

[49]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. , 1987 .

[50]  Mark S. Seidenberg The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems , 1985, Cognition.

[51]  D. Balota,et al.  A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[52]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition , 1984 .

[53]  Jacob Cohen The Cost of Dichotomization , 1983 .

[54]  A. Cutler Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? , 1981, Cognition.

[55]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30 thousand English words , 2012 .

[56]  R. Baayen A real experiment is a factorial experiment , 2010 .

[57]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 2007 .

[58]  David A. Balota,et al.  Visual Word Recognition: The Journey from Features to Meaning (A Travel Update) , 2006 .

[59]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[60]  A. Ellis,et al.  What exactly interacts with spelling-sound consistency in word naming? , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[61]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Theories of word naming interact with spelling-sound consistency. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[62]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  Writing to dictation in real time in adults: What are the determinants of written latencies , 2002 .

[63]  Cristina Izura,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in word recognition and production in first and second languages , 2002 .

[64]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[65]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[66]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[67]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. , 1993 .

[68]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[69]  Lloyd G. Humphreys,et al.  Research on individual differences requires correlational analysis, not ANOVA , 1978 .

[70]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[71]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .