Dose Proportionality of Fentanyl Buccal Tablet in Healthy Japanese Volunteers

Objective This study was conducted to assess the dose proportionality, safety, and tolerability of fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) in Japanese volunteers. Methods Healthy, opioid-naive Japanese adults received single-dose FBT 100, 200, 400, and 800 µg in a randomized, open-label, crossover fashion. Naltrexone was given to minimize the opioid effects of fentanyl. Peak serum fentanyl concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), area under the serum fentanyl concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞), and AUC from 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0–last) were summarized using descriptive statistics. Dose proportionality was claimed if the ln-ln plots of Cmax, AUC0–∞, and AUC0–last vs. dose were linear and the 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the slopes were within 0.8927 and 1.1073. The safety population comprised volunteers who received ≥1 FBT. Results Twenty-five volunteers were enrolled, 23 were included in the safety population (mean age 35.3 years), and 19 completed the study. The assessment of dose proportionality did not meet the statistical criteria (slope [90% CI]: 0.9118 [0.8601, 0.9635] for Cmax, 1.0756 [1.0377, 1.1136] for AUC0–∞, and 1.0992 [1.0677, 1.1307] for AUC0–last). However, the increase in systemic exposure with dose appeared linear, and a post hoc analysis of partial AUCs from time 0 to 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours supported dose proportionality. Median tmax of 90 minutes (range 30–180 minutes) was independent of dose. Adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate. The most frequent AEs were nausea (N = 9), dizziness (N = 8), headache (N = 6), somnolence (N = 6), dyspepsia (N = 5), and vomiting (N = 3). No application-site or serious AEs were reported. Conclusions Systemic exposure to FBT was approximately dose proportional across the range 100 µg to 800 µg in healthy Japanese adults. Adverse events were mild or moderate.

[1]  M. Darwish,et al.  Effect of buccal dwell time on the pharmacokinetic profile of fentanyl buccal tablet , 2007, Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy.

[2]  E. Hellriegel,et al.  Single‐Dose and Steady‐State Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl Buccal Tablet in Healthy Volunteers , 2007, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[3]  M. Darwish,et al.  Relative bioavailability of the fentanyl effervescent buccal tablet (FEBT) 1,080 pg versus oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate 1,600 pg and dose proportionality of FEBT 270 to 1,300 microg: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, three-period study in healthy adult volunteers. , 2006, Clinical therapeutics.

[4]  P. Robertson,et al.  Pharmacokinetic properties of fentanyl effervescent buccal tablets: a phase I, open-label, crossover study of single-dose 100, 200, 400, and 800 microg in healthy adult volunteers. , 2006, Clinical therapeutics.

[5]  J. Messina,et al.  Fentanyl effervescent buccal tablets , 2006 .

[6]  H. Pieniaszek,et al.  Oxymorphone Extended Release Does Not Affect CYP2C9 or CYP3A4 Metabolic Pathways , 2005, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[7]  F. Guengerich,et al.  Identification of Human Liver Cytochrome P-450 3A4 as the Enzyme Responsible for Fentanyl and Sufentanil N-Dealkylation , 1996, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  E. Hellriegel,et al.  Comparison of Equivalent Doses of Fentanyl Buccal Tablets and Arteriovenous Differences in Fentanyl Pharmacokinetics , 2006, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[9]  F. Vandenhende,et al.  Confidence Interval Criteria for Assessment of Dose Proportionality , 2004, Pharmaceutical Research.