The ‘dark side’ of knowledge brokering

Deploying knowledge brokers to bridge the ‘gap’ between researchers and practitioners continues to be seen as an unquestionable enabler of evidence-based practice and is often endorsed uncritically. We explore the ‘dark side’ of knowledge brokering, reflecting on its inherent challenges which we categorize as: (1) tensions between different aspects of brokering; (2) tensions between different types and sources of knowledge; and (3) tensions resulting from the ‘in-between’ position of brokers. As a result of these tensions, individual brokers may struggle to maintain their fragile and ambiguous intermediary position, and some of the knowledge may be lost in the ‘in-between world’, whereby research evidence is transferred to research users without being mobilized in their day-to-day practice. To be effective, brokering requires an amalgamation of several types of knowledge and a multidimensional skill set that needs to be sustained over time. If we want to maximize the impact of research on policy and practice, we should move from deploying individual ‘brokers’ to embracing the collective process of ‘brokering’ supported at the organizational and policy levels.

[1]  Roman Kislov,et al.  BOUNDARY DISCONTINUITY IN A CONSTELLATION OF INTERCONNECTED PRACTICES , 2014 .

[2]  P. Stolee,et al.  Knowledge brokers in a knowledge network: the case of Seniors Health Research Transfer Network knowledge brokers , 2013, Implementation Science.

[3]  Anneke Fitzgerald,et al.  Organisational professional conflict and hybrid clinician managers: the effects of dual roles in Australian health care organizations. , 2009, Journal of health organization and management.

[4]  C. Deaton,et al.  A qualitative study of a primary-care based intervention to improve the management of patients with heart failure: the dynamic relationship between facilitation and context , 2014, BMC Family Practice.

[5]  A. Lockett,et al.  A qualitative study of the knowledge-brokering role of middle-level managers in service innovation: managing the translation gap in patient safety for older persons’ care , 2014 .

[6]  Maureen Dobbins,et al.  Life as a knowledge broker in public health , 2008 .

[7]  G. Martin,et al.  Institutionalising Knowledge Brokering as a Sustainable Knowledge Translation Solution in Healthcare: How Can It Work in Practice?. , 2013 .

[8]  Laura C. Rosella,et al.  Exploring the function and effectiveness of knowledge brokers as facilitators of knowledge translation in health-related settings: a systematic review and thematic analysis , 2015, Implementation Science.

[9]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Theorizing and Researching the Dark Side of Organization , 2014 .

[10]  A. House,et al.  Knowledge Brokering: The missing link in the evidence to action chain? , 2009, Evidence & policy : a journal of research, debate and practice.

[11]  G. Permanand,et al.  How can knowledge brokering be better supported across European health system , 2013 .

[12]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[13]  Justin Waring,et al.  A formative evaluation of Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC): institutional entrepreneurship for service innovation , 2014 .

[14]  K. Walshe,et al.  Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: lessons from the theory of communities of practice , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[15]  Joyce E. Wilkinson,et al.  Collaborative action around implementation in Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: towards a programme theory , 2013, Journal of health services research & policy.

[16]  A. Lockett,et al.  Prospects for knowledge exchange in health policy and management: Institutional and epistemic boundaries , 2011, Journal of health services research & policy.

[17]  Joyce E. Wilkinson,et al.  Collective action for implementation: a realist evaluation of organisational collaboration in healthcare , 2015, Implementation Science.

[18]  J. Lomas.  The in-between world of knowledge brokering , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  M. Dobbins,et al.  Knowledge brokering in public health: a tale of two studies. , 2014, Public health.

[20]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature. , 2010, The Milbank quarterly.

[21]  D. Hodgson,et al.  Professionals as knowledge brokers: The limits of authority in healthcare collaboration , 2016 .

[22]  Nicola Wright.  First-Time Knowledge Brokers in Health Care: The Experiences of Nurses and Allied Health Professionals of Bridging the Research-Practice Gap. , 2013 .

[23]  David Bamford,et al.  The NIHR collaboration for leadership in applied health research and care (CLAHRC) for greater manchester: combining empirical, theoretical and experiential evidence to design and evaluate a large-scale implementation strategy , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[24]  C. Ward-Griffin,et al.  Evolving the theory and praxis of knowledge translation through social interaction: a social phenomenological study , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[25]  Graham Martin,et al.  Spanning boundaries in pursuit of effective knowledge sharing within networks in the NHS. , 2007, Journal of health organization and management.

[26]  J. Gabbay,et al.  Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines?” Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  Eva Grunfeld,et al.  Reflections on Knowledge Brokering Within a Multidisciplinary Research Team , 2011, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.