Special Issue: Trust in an Organizational Context: The Use of Rewards to Increase and Decrease Trust: Mediating Processes and Differential Effects

We test hypotheses asserting that reward structures--an omnipresent element of the work context--have a strong influence on interpersonal trust, and we explore the cognitive and behavioral routes through which the effects may occur. Specifically, we use attribution theory to identify several core processes including social perception (causal schemas), self-perception, and attributional biases (correspondence bias, suspicion effects, and preexisting expectations) that may explain trust development. A 3 (cooperative/competitive/mixed rewards) X 2 (high/low initial trust) experimental design in a problem-solving task was used to examine the hypotheses. The results suggest that reward structures have a strong influence on trust, and that the effect is mediated by causal schemas, suspicion effects, and self-perception. We also found some support for the prediction that the impact of mixed reward structures on trust is biased by individuals' preexisting expectations about their partner's trustworthiness. The theory and results suggest that attribution theory provides a useful framework for understanding the complex, diverse, and multiple routes through which trust may develop.

[1]  H. Kelley.  The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[2]  M. Deutsch.  A Theory of Co-operation and Competition , 1949 .

[3]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making: Antecedents to Effective Self-Managing Teams. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[5]  Michaela Koller.  Risk as a Determinant of Trust , 1988 .

[6]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[7]  D. Tjosvold.  Cooperation Theory and Organizations , 1984 .

[8]  J. Hennart,et al.  Upstream vertical integration in the aluminum and tin industries : A comparative study of the choice between market and intrafirm coordination , 1988 .

[9]  Sheldon S. Zalkind,et al.  The Impact of an Organizational Development Program on Perceptions of Interpersonal, Group, and Organization Functioning , 1969 .

[10]  David De Cremer,et al.  The Leadership Quarterly , 2005 .

[11]  R. Woodman,et al.  The role of team development in organizational effectiveness: A critical review. , 1980 .

[12]  Dorothy Marcic Hai.  Organizational Behavior: Experiences and Cases , 1986 .

[13]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of cooperative and competitive interdependence and task complexity on subordinates' productivity, perception of leader, and group development. , 1982 .

[14]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors , 1990 .

[15]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[16]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The correspondence bias. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Merrill Carlsmith.  Methods of research in social psychology , 1976 .

[18]  V B CLINE,et al.  INTERPERSONAL PERCEPTION. , 1964, Progress in experimental personality research.

[19]  Robert D. Miewald.  Administrative Science Quarterly , 1981 .

[20]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Perceiver-Induced Constraint: Interpretations of Self-Generated Reality , 1986 .

[21]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Managing a virtual workplace , 2000 .

[22]  D. Bem.  Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[23]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. , 1982 .

[24]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Building Commitment, Attachment, and Trust in Strategic Decision-Making Teams: The Role of Procedural Justice , 1995 .

[26]  W. Brogden.  Annual Review of Psychology , 1957 .

[27]  L. Strickland.  Surveillance and trust1 , 1958 .

[28]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Journal of Marketing Research , 1968 .

[30]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Dynamics Within Participation: An Experimental Investigation , 1985 .

[31]  Glenn E. Littlepage,et al.  An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. , 1995 .

[32]  Jon M. Werner,et al.  Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior , 1998 .

[33]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships , 1998 .

[34]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Role playing variations and their informational value for person perception. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[35]  M. Deutsch.  An Experimental Study of the Effects of Co-Operation and Competition upon Group Process , 1949 .

[36]  Giacomo Mauro DAriano.  The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. , 2002 .

[37]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Generalizing From Laboratory to Field Settings. , 1987 .

[38]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[39]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Beyond Attribution Theory: Cognitive Processes in Performance Appraisal , 1981 .

[40]  M. Korsgaard,et al.  Trust in the face of conflict: the role of managerial trustworthy behavior and organizational context. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  John O. Summers,et al.  Checking the Success of Manipulations in Marketing Experiments , 1986 .

[42]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation. , 1996 .

[43]  Leonard D. Goodstein,et al.  Team Building: Issues and Alternatives , 1978 .

[44]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[45]  Irving M. Lane,et al.  A note on the role of laboratory methodologies in applied behavioural research: Don't throw out the baby with the bath water , 1988 .

[46]  L. Strickland.  Surveillance and trust. , 1958, Journal of personality.

[47]  J Naughtie.  Don't throw out the baby with the bath water. , 1985, Nursing times.

[48]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Attribution of the "causes" of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. , 1975 .

[49]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[50]  H. Guetzkow.  Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data , 1950 .

[51]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Trust in Leadership: Meta-Analytic Findings and Implications for Organizational Research , 2001 .

[52]  D. Ferrin,et al.  The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings , 2001 .

[53]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[54]  J E Thompson,et al.  Don't throw out the baby with the bath water: A perspective on carotid endarterectomy , 1986 .

[55]  S. Fein,et al.  Judging others in the shadow of suspicion , 1994 .

[56]  Philip Yetton,et al.  An integration of process and decision scheme explanations of group problem solving performance , 1988 .

[57]  John K. Butler,et al.  Communication Factors and Trust: An Exploratory Study , 1994 .

[58]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[59]  Steven Fein.  Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias , 1996 .

[60]  A. Kruglanski.  Attributing trustworthiness in supervisor-worker relations , 1970 .

[61]  E. E. Jones,et al.  From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1 , 1965 .