Cross Cultural Differences in Managers’ Support for Home-Based Telework

Home-based telework is one of the arrangements organizations can introduce to facilitate a better balance between employees’ professional and private lives. This article focuses on the question of under what conditions managers grant a subordinate’s request to telework and what role national cultures play herein. By looking into managers’ willingness to delegate power and to trust home-based teleworkers we try to explain the slow adoption of home-based telework and the reported differences across Northern and Southern European countries. In doing so we will make use of Hofstede’s writings on national cultures and of the propositions made by the telework literature on how to mitigate the potential trust problem associated with distance working. The purpose of the article is to develop new hypotheses regarding factors that influence managerial decision-making concerning telework and how these interact with national cultures. To test the hypotheses, a cross-national vignette study is proposed.

[1]  M. Barrett.  Managing Telework: Perspectives from Human Resource Management and Work Psychology , 2001, Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management.

[2]  A. Klidas.  The Cultural Relativity of Employee Empowerment : Findings from the European Hotel Industry , 2002 .

[3]  J.M.M. van der Wielen,et al.  Recent conceptual developments in telework research , 1994 .

[4]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[5]  Nancy B. Kurland,et al.  A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work , 2002 .

[6]  R. Bhagat.  Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations , 2002 .

[7]  P. Jackson,et al.  Virtual Working: Social and Organisational Dynamics , 1999 .

[8]  Louise M. Adami.  Autonomy, control and the virtual worker , 2002 .

[9]  Susan J. Harrington,et al.  Telecommuting: a test of trust, competing values, and relative advantage , 1999 .

[10]  Pablo Cardona,et al.  The adoption of family‐friendly HRM policies , 2001 .

[11]  L. den Dulk,et al.  Work-family arrangements in organisations: a cross-national study in the Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom and Sweden , 2001 .

[12]  Kea G. Tijdens,et al.  Employees' opportunities, preferences, and practices in telecommuting adoption , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[13]  U. Huws,et al.  Telework: Towards the Elusive Office , 1990 .

[14]  C. Hales.  Managing Through Organization: The Management Process, Forms of Organization and the Work of Managers , 1993 .

[15]  E. Kevin Kelloway,et al.  Flexible work arrangements : managing the work-family boundary , 1998 .

[16]  Karsten Gareis.  The Intensity of Telework in 2002 in the EU, Switzerland and the USA , 2002 .

[17]  J. Nilles.  Managing Telework: Strategies for Managing the Virtual Workforce , 1998 .

[18]  Paul Sparrow,et al.  Human Resource Management and the Virtual Organisation: mapping the future research issues , 1999 .

[19]  Gary N. Powell,et al.  Managerial decision making regarding alternative work arrangements , 1999 .

[20]  S. Bergum,et al.  Sustainability in the new economy : Designing a New Work Space, Sustainability and ethical dimensions , 2002 .