New Product Diffusion with Influentials and Imitators

We model the diffusion of innovations in markets with two segments: influentials who are more in touch with new developments and who affect another segment of imitators whose own adoptions do not affect the influentials. This two-segment structure with asymmetric influence is consistent with several theories in sociology and diffusion research, as well as many “viral” or “network” marketing strategies. We have four main results. 1 Diffusion in a mixture of influentials and imitators can exhibit a dip or “chasm” between the early and later parts of the diffusion curve. 2 The proportion of adoptions stemming from influentials need not decrease monotonically, but may first decrease and then increase. 3 Erroneously specifying a mixed-influence model to a mixture process where influentials act independently from each other can generate systematic changes in the parameter values reported in earlier research. 4 Empirical analysis of 33 different data series indicates that the two-segment model fits better than the standard mixed-influence, the Gamma/Shifted Gompertz, and the Weibull-Gamma models, especially in cases where a two-segment structure is likely to exist. Also, the two-segment model fits about as well as the Karmeshu-Goswami mixed-influence model, in which the coefficients of innovation and imitation vary across potential adopters in a continuous fashion.

[1]  D. Riesman,et al.  The Lonely Crowd , 2017 .

[2]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  6. Katz, E. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[3]  E. Katz The Two-Step Flow of Communication: An Up-To-Date Report on an Hypothesis , 1957 .

[4]  D. Cox,et al.  THE ANALYSIS OF EXPONENTIALLY DISTRIBUTED LIFE-TIMES WITH Two TYPES OF FAILURE , 1959 .

[5]  K. Isii,et al.  On a stochastic model concerning the pattern of communication , 1959 .

[6]  Elihu Katz,et al.  The two-step flow of communication. , 1960 .

[7]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[8]  E. Mansfield TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE RATE OF IMITATION , 1961 .

[9]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[10]  J. Coleman Introduction to Mathematical Sociology , 1965 .

[11]  Gordon Fisher,et al.  Priority Patterns and the Demand for Household Durable Goods , 1965 .

[12]  Alvin J. Silk,et al.  Overlap among Self-Designated Opinion Leaders: A Study of Selected Dental Products and Services , 1966 .

[13]  Kenneth E. Boulding,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. , 1966 .

[14]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[15]  D. Daley Concerning the spread of news in a population of individuals who never forget. , 1967, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[16]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign , 1968 .

[17]  M. Becker,et al.  Sociometric Location and Innovativeness: Reformulation and Extension of the Diffusion Model , 1970 .

[18]  Gareth Horsnell,et al.  Stochastic Models of Buying Behavior , 1971 .

[19]  Ross A. Williams Growth in Ownership of Consumer Durables in the United Kingdom , 1972 .

[20]  James H. Myers,et al.  Dimensions of Opinion Leadership , 1972 .

[21]  Per Lekvall,et al.  A STUDY OF SOME ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING INNOVATION DIFFUSION , 1973 .

[22]  G. Hernes,et al.  Diffusion and Growth-The Non-homogeneous Case , 1976 .

[23]  D. Midgley,et al.  Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement , 1978 .

[24]  Frank Cancian The Innovator's Situation: Upper-Middle-Class Conservatism in Agricultural Communities , 1979 .

[25]  P. Bourdieu Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[26]  S. Davies The Diffusion of Process Innovations , 1979 .

[27]  R. Dixon,et al.  Hybrid Corn Revisited , 1980 .

[28]  Abel P. Jeuland Parsimonious Models of Diffusion of Innovation: Part A: Derivations and Comparisons , 1981 .

[29]  Ambar G. Rao,et al.  Bayesian Estimation and Control of Detailing Effort in a Repeat Purchase Diffusion Environment , 1981 .

[30]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  Technical Note---Nonlinear Least Squares Estimation of New Product Diffusion Models , 1986 .

[31]  R. Burt Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  N. Derzko,et al.  Innovators and imitators in innovation diffusion modelling , 1988 .

[33]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Determination of Adopter Categories by Using Innovation Diffusion Models , 1990 .

[34]  S. Narayanan Incorporating heterogeneous adoption rates in new product diffusion: A model and empirical investigations , 1992 .

[35]  D. N. Prabhakar Murthy,et al.  A Mathematical Model for New Product Diffusion: The Influence of Innovators and Imitators , 1992 .

[36]  Albert C. Bemmaor Modeling the Diffusion of New Durable Goods: Word-of-Mouth Effect Versus Consumer Heterogeneity , 1992 .

[37]  J. MacKinnon,et al.  Estimation and inference in econometrics , 1994 .

[38]  K. Sridhar Moorthy,et al.  Theoretical Modeling in Marketing , 1993 .

[39]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Chapter 8 New-product diffusion models , 1993, Marketing.

[40]  Jonathan K. Frenzen,et al.  Structure, Cooperation, and the Flow of Market Information , 1993 .

[41]  Christopher M. Miller,et al.  Toward Formalizing Fashion Theory , 1993 .

[42]  P. Adler Time-and-motion regained , 1993 .

[43]  Harvey S. Rosen,et al.  Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the states , 1993 .

[44]  Peter S. H. Leeflang,et al.  RESEARCH TRADITIONS IN MARKETING , 1993 .

[45]  Benson P. Shapiro,et al.  Leveraging to beat the odds: the new marketing mind-set , 1993 .

[46]  G. Weimann The Influentials: People Who Influence People , 1994 .

[47]  Perrin Meyer,et al.  Bi-logistic growth , 1994 .

[48]  Lakshman Krishnamurthi,et al.  Analysis of New Product Diffusion Using a Four-Segment Trial-Repeat Model , 1994 .

[49]  A. Raftery Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research , 1995 .

[50]  M. Maffesoli The Time of the Tribes: The Decline of Individualism in Mass Society , 1995 .

[51]  M. Meler,et al.  New product diffusion models , 1995 .

[52]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty , 1997 .

[53]  G. Lilien,et al.  Bias and Systematic Change in the Parameter Estimates of Macro-Level Diffusion Models , 1997 .

[54]  Subrata K. Sen,et al.  Mixing Behavior in Cross-Country Diffusion , 1997 .

[55]  V. Mahajan,et al.  When is it Worthwhile Targeting the Majority Instead of the Innovators in a New Product Launch? , 1998 .

[56]  G. Lilien,et al.  Erratum to Bias and Sysematic Change in the Parameter Estimates of Macro-Level Diffusion Models , 1998 .

[57]  Juliet B. Schor,et al.  The overspent American : upscaling, downshifting, and the new consumer , 1998 .

[58]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Social Heterogeneities in Classical New Product Diffusion Models , 1998 .

[59]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of New Product Trial Forecasting Models , 1998 .

[60]  Henry S.J. Robben,et al.  How Hits Happen , 1999 .

[61]  Ariane Stihler,et al.  Juliet B. Schor: The Overspent American. Upscaling, Downshifting, and the New Consumer. New York: Basic Books, 1998. , 2000 .

[62]  E. Rosen The Anatomy of Buzz , 2000 .

[63]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  Crossing the Chasm , 2001 .

[64]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  Modeling Hedonic Portfolio Products: A Joint Segmentation Analysis of Music Compact Disc Sales , 2001 .

[65]  G. Lilien,et al.  Two-Stage Partial Observability Models of Innovation Adoption , 2001 .

[66]  G. Lilien,et al.  Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[67]  Karmeshu,et al.  Stochastic evolution of innovation diffusion in heterogeneous groups: study of life cycle patterns , 2001 .

[68]  Damon J. Phillips,et al.  Middle‐Status Conformity: Theoretical Restatement and Empirical Demonstration in Two Markets1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[69]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Riding the Saddle: How Cross-Market Communications Can Create a Major Slump in Sales , 2002 .

[70]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  Fast-Track: Article Using Advance Purchase Orders to Forecast New Product Sales , 2002 .

[71]  Lawrence Feick,et al.  Changing faces: cosmetics opinion leadership among women in the new Hungary , 2002 .

[72]  Philip Hans Franses Testing for residual autocorrelation in growth curve models , 2002 .

[73]  David Godes,et al.  Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication , 2004 .

[74]  Albert C. BemmaorJanghyuk Lee,et al.  Research Note The Impact of Heterogeneity and Ill-Conditioning on Diffusion Model Parameter Estimates , 2002 .

[75]  Thomas W Valente,et al.  Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[76]  Marianela Fornerino Internet adoption in France , 2003 .

[77]  Rajkumar Venkatesan,et al.  Evolutionary Estimation of Macro-Level Diffusion Models Using Genetic Algorithms: An Alternative to Nonlinear Least Squares , 2004 .

[78]  Stefan Stremersch,et al.  Social Contagion and Income Heterogeneity in New Product Diffusion: A Meta-Analytic Test , 2004 .

[79]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[80]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  From Density to Destiny: Using Spatial Dimension of Sales Data for Early Prediction of New Product Success , 2004 .

[81]  Bart J. Bronnenberg,et al.  Market Roll-Out and Retailer Adoption for New Brands , 2004 .

[82]  G. Seber,et al.  Nonlinear Regression: Seber/Nonlinear Regression , 2005 .

[83]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  Counting Your Customers the Easy Way: An Alternative to the Pareto/NBD Model , 2005 .

[84]  Jonathan Beck The Sales Effect of Word of Mouth: A Model for Creative Goods and Estimates for Novels , 2006 .

[85]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  When giving some away makes sense to jump-start the diffusion process , 2006 .

[86]  W. Polonsky,et al.  The Tipping Point , 2007, The Diabetes educator.