Prostate Gleason score prediction via MRI using capsule network

Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive modality for diagnosing prostate carcinoma (PCa) and deep learning has gained increasing interest in MR images. We propose a novel 3D Capsule Network to perform low grade vs high grade PCa classification. The proposed network utilizes Efficient CapsNet as backbone and consists of three main components, 3D convolutional blocks, depth-wise separable 3D convolution, and self-attention routing. The network employs convolutional blocks to extract high level features, which will form primary capsules via depth-wise separable convolution operations. A self-attention mechanism is used to route primary capsules to higher level capsules and finally a PCa grade is assigned. The proposed 3D Capsule Network was trained and tested using a public dataset that involves 529 patients diagnosed with PCa. A baseline 3D CNN method was also experimented for comparison. Our Capsule Network achieved 85% accuracy and 0.87 AUC, while the baseline CNN achieved 80% accuracy and 0.84 AUC. The superior performance of Capsule Network demonstrates its feasibility for PCa grade classification from prostate MRI and shows its potential in assisting clinical decision-making.

[1]  Tian Liu,et al.  Reinforcement learning in medical image analysis: Concepts, applications, challenges, and future directions , 2022, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[2]  J. Roper,et al.  Abdomen CT Multi-organ Segmentation Using Token-based MLP-Mixer. , 2022, Medical physics.

[3]  J. Bradley,et al.  Validation of a deep learning-based material estimation model for Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton therapy , 2022, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  J. Roper,et al.  Male pelvic multi-organ segmentation using token-based transformer Vnet , 2022, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[5]  Qian Wang,et al.  Dual-energy CT based mass density and relative stopping power estimation for proton therapy using physics-informed deep learning , 2022, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2022 , 2022, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  Basim S. O. Alsaedi,et al.  Prediction of Clinically Significant Cancer Using Radiomics Features of Pre-Biopsy of Multiparametric MRI in Men Suspected of Prostate Cancer , 2021, Cancers.

[8]  Grace J Gang,et al.  Generative Adversarial Networks and Radiomics Supervision for Lung Lesion Synthesis. , 2021, Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering.

[9]  M. Chiaberge,et al.  Efficient-CapsNet: capsule network with self-attention routing , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[10]  W. Niessen,et al.  Automated Classification of Significant Prostate Cancer on MRI: A Systematic Review on the Performance of Machine Learning Applications , 2020, Cancers.

[11]  Paulo Mazzoncini de Azevedo Marques,et al.  Artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer-aided diagnosis, and radiomics: advances in imaging towards to precision medicine , 2019, Radiologia brasileira.

[12]  Hao Chen,et al.  VoxResNet: Deep voxelwise residual networks for brain segmentation from 3D MR images , 2017, NeuroImage.

[13]  S. Loeb,et al.  Whom to Biopsy: Prediagnostic Risk Stratification with Biomarkers, Nomograms, and Risk Calculators. , 2017, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[14]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Dynamic Routing Between Capsules , 2017, NIPS.

[15]  H. G. van der Poel,et al.  EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. , 2017, European urology.

[16]  L. Egevad,et al.  A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score. , 2016, European urology.

[17]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data , 2015, Radiology.

[18]  A. Evans,et al.  Prostate cancers scored as Gleason 6 on prostate biopsy are frequently Gleason 7 tumors at radical prostatectomy: implication on outcome. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[19]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists. , 2001, Human pathology.

[20]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 , 1995 .