Focusing Conservation Efforts on Ecosystem Service Supply May Increase Vulnerability of Socio-Ecological Systems

Growing concern about the loss of ecosystem services (ES) promotes their spatial representation as a key tool for the internalization of the ES framework into land use policies. Paradoxically, mapping approaches meant to inform policy decisions focus on the magnitude and spatial distribution of the biophysical supply of ES, largely ignoring the social mechanisms by which these services influence human wellbeing. If social mechanisms affecting ES demand, enhancing it or reducing it, are taken more into account, then policies are more effective. By developing and applying a new mapping routine to two distinct socio-ecological systems, we show a strong spatial uncoupling between ES supply and socio-ecological vulnerability to the loss of ES, under scenarios of land use and cover change. Public policies based on ES supply might not only fail at detecting priority conservation areas for the wellbeing of human societies, but may also increase their vulnerability by neglecting areas of currently low, but highly valued ES supply.

[1]  R. Costanza,et al.  Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making , 2009 .

[2]  C. Dormann,et al.  A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead , 2011 .

[3]  Saturnino M. Borras,et al.  Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean , 2012 .

[4]  Jacqueline de Chazal,et al.  Including multiple differing stakeholder values into vulnerability assessments of socio-ecological systems , 2008 .

[5]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver , 2009 .

[6]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Six Common Mistakes in Conservation Priority Setting , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[7]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Modelling ecosystem services in terrestrial systems , 2010, F1000 biology reports.

[8]  Orie L. Loucks,et al.  Scaling and uncertainty analysis in ecology : methods and applications , 2006 .

[9]  H. Geoghegan,et al.  Human geographies of climate change: Landscape, temporality, and lay knowledges , 2011 .

[10]  Brendan Fisher,et al.  Valuing Ecosystem Services: The Case of Multi-functional Wetlands , 2008 .

[11]  E. F. Viglizzo,et al.  Land-use options for Del Plata Basin in South America: Tradeoffs analysis based on ecosystem service provision , 2006 .

[12]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[13]  Darius J. Semmens,et al.  A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation , 2013 .

[14]  C. Folke,et al.  Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience , 1998 .

[15]  P. Meir,et al.  Understanding the relationships between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: A conceptual framework , 2014 .

[16]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[17]  C. F. Gaymer,et al.  Opportunities and constraints of the institutional framework for the implementation of ecosystem-based management: The case of the Chilean coast , 2013 .

[18]  A. Shvidenko.  Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis , 2005 .

[19]  Chris Frid,et al.  Ecosystem Ecology , 2018, Encyclopedia of Theoretical Ecology.

[20]  B. Voigt,et al.  From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments , 2014 .

[21]  R. Leemans,et al.  A Multidisciplinary multi-scale framework for assessing vulnerability to global change , 2004 .

[22]  T. Daw,et al.  Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being , 2011, Environmental Conservation.

[23]  Laura Nahuelhual,et al.  Mapping of ecosystem services: Missing links between purposes and procedures , 2015 .

[24]  Perry E. Cabot,et al.  Disproportionality as a Framework for Linking Social and Biophysical Systems , 2006 .

[25]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Ecology: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being , 2010 .

[26]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Facing uncertainty in ecosystem services-based resource management. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[27]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS IN ECOLOGICAL STUDIES:AN OVERVIEW , 2006 .

[28]  G. Daily,et al.  The Ecosystem Services Framework and Natural Capital Conservation , 2008 .

[29]  B. Grizzetti,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union , 2012 .

[30]  Lindsay C. Stringer,et al.  Using Principal Component Analysis for information-rich socio-ecological vulnerability mapping in Southern Africa , 2012 .

[31]  Wilhelm Windhorst,et al.  Ecosystem based modeling and indication of ecological integrity in the German North Sea—Case study offshore wind parks , 2011 .

[32]  M. Vighi,et al.  Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment--a review and perspectives. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[33]  Pamela A Matson,et al.  Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  P. Laterra,et al.  Spatial complexity and ecosystem services in rural landscapes , 2012 .

[35]  M. Rounsevell,et al.  The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change , 2006 .

[36]  Till Sterzel,et al.  A new method for analysing socio-ecological patterns of vulnerability , 2015, Regional Environmental Change.

[37]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Ecosystem Services and Emergent Vulnerability in Managed Ecosystems: A Geospatial Decision-Support Tool , 2008, Ecosystems.

[38]  medolbec.  Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity , 2010 .

[39]  M. Martínez‐Harms,et al.  Ecosystem value in the Western Patagonia protected areas , 2008 .