Ultrasonography-guided antegrade common femoral artery approach: Factors associated with access time

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of ultrasonography-guided antegrade common femoral artery puncture and subsequent superficial femoral artery access without the aid of fluoroscopy. Factors that could affect access time were also assessed. Methods: A total of 294 cases from 218 consecutive patients (163 men, 55 women; mean age: 66.9 ± 12.7 years) who underwent lower extremity endovascular procedures were retrospectively evaluated. The time between the injection of local anesthetic and the insertion of the microsheath into the superficial femoral artery was measured. The common femoral artery diameter, cutis thickness, distance between arterial puncture site and common femoral artery bifurcation, degree of common femoral artery calcification, body mass index, and history of previous access were investigated to assess their relationship with access time. Furthermore, all cases were assessed with ultrasonography for access-site complications before discharge. Results: Technical success was achieved in 293 of 294 procedures (99.7%). The mean time for superficial femoral artery access was 1.9 ± 0.8 min (range, 0.7–3.7 min). Additional fluoroscopic guidance was needed in one case. There were moderately positive correlations of body mass index (r = 0.75; p < 0.001) and cutis thickness (r = 0.58; p < 0.001) with access time. The other variables failed to reveal significant correlations with access time. Five groin hematomas occurred after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Complications such as pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, or retroperitoneal hematoma were not observed. Conclusion: Antegrade common femoral artery puncture with subsequent superficial femoral artery access conducted solely under ultrasonography guidance was feasible and safe. In addition, the antegrade access time showed positive correlations with body mass index and cutis thickness.

[1]  D. Rybin,et al.  Common femoral artery antegrade and retrograde approaches have similar access site complications , 2019, Journal of vascular surgery.

[2]  D. Rybin,et al.  Routine Use of Ultrasound Guidance in Femoral Arterial Access for Peripheral Vascular Intervention Decreases Groin Hematoma Rates in High-Volume Surgeons. , 2018, Annals of vascular surgery.

[3]  Sang-Hyun Kim,et al.  Body mass index and the risk of low femoral artery puncture in coronary angiography under fluoroscopy guidance , 2018, Medicine.

[4]  A. Seto,et al.  Defining the common femoral artery: Insights from the femoral arterial access with ultrasound trial , 2017, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[5]  D. Rybin,et al.  Routine use of ultrasound guidance in femoral arterial access for peripheral vascular intervention decreases groin hematoma rates. , 2014, Journal of vascular surgery.

[6]  Michael J. Lee,et al.  Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided and Fluoroscopy-Assisted Antegrade Common Femoral Artery Puncture Techniques , 2015, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[7]  K. Hergan,et al.  Comparison of a 21G Micropuncture Needle and a Regular 19G Access Needle for Antegrade Arterial Access into the Superficial Femoral Artery , 2014, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[8]  Marc Cohen,et al.  Pitfalls associated with the use of current recommendations for fluoroscopy‐guided common femoral artery access , 2013, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[9]  C. Binkert,et al.  Ultrasound-guided antegrade femoral access: comparison between the common femoral artery and the superficial femoral artery , 2011, European Radiology.

[10]  C. Binkert,et al.  Antegrade access to the superficial femoral artery with ultrasound guidance: feasibility and safety. , 2010, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[11]  G. Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Mastering the antegrade femoral artery access in patients with symptomatic lower limb ischemia: Learning curve, complications, and technical tips and tricks , 2006 .

[12]  K. Lotzof,et al.  Access to the Superficial Femoral Artery in the Presence of a “Hostile Groin”: A Prospective Study , 2007, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[13]  R. Uberoi,et al.  Retrograde vs. Antegrade Puncture for Infra-Inguinal Angioplasty , 2003, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[14]  C. Toh,et al.  Sonographically Guided Antegrade Common Femoral Artery Access , 2002, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[15]  W. Mali,et al.  Antegrade puncture of the femoral artery: morphologic study. , 1990, Radiology.

[16]  G. Palagallo,et al.  Antegrade selective catheterization of the superficial femoral artery using a movable-core guide wire. , 1985, Radiology.