An Efficient Pipeline for Abdomen Segmentation in CT Images

Computed tomography (CT) scans usually include some disadvantages due to the nature of the imaging procedure, and these handicaps prevent accurate abdomen segmentation. Discontinuous abdomen edges, bed section of CT, patient information, closeness between the edges of the abdomen and CT, poor contrast, and a narrow histogram can be regarded as the most important handicaps that occur in abdominal CT scans. Currently, one or more handicaps can arise and prevent technicians obtaining abdomen images through simple segmentation techniques. In other words, CT scans can include the bed section of CT, a patient’s diagnostic information, low-quality abdomen edges, low-level contrast, and narrow histogram, all in one scan. These phenomena constitute a challenge, and an efficient pipeline that is unaffected by handicaps is required. In addition, analysis such as segmentation, feature selection, and classification has meaning for a real-time diagnosis system in cases where the abdomen section is directly used with a specific size. A statistical pipeline is designed in this study that is unaffected by the handicaps mentioned above. Intensity-based approaches, morphological processes, and histogram-based procedures are utilized to design an efficient structure. Performance evaluation is realized in experiments on 58 CT images (16 training, 16 test, and 26 validation) that include the abdomen and one or more disadvantage(s). The first part of the data (16 training images) is used to detect the pipeline’s optimum parameters, while the second and third parts are utilized to evaluate and to confirm the segmentation performance. The segmentation results are presented as the means of six performance metrics. Thus, the proposed method achieves remarkable average rates for training/test/validation of 98.95/99.36/99.57% (jaccard), 99.47/99.67/99.79% (dice), 100/99.91/99.91% (sensitivity), 98.47/99.23/99.85% (specificity), 99.38/99.63/99.87% (classification accuracy), and 98.98/99.45/99.66% (precision). In summary, a statistical pipeline performing the task of abdomen segmentation is achieved that is not affected by the disadvantages, and the most detailed abdomen segmentation study is performed for the use before organ and tumor segmentation, feature extraction, and classification.

[1]  Karel J. Zuiderveld,et al.  Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization , 1994, Graphics Gems.

[2]  Jing Bai,et al.  Multiple Abdominal Organ Segmentation: An Atlas-Based Fuzzy Connectedness Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[3]  Re Gonzalez,et al.  R.C. Eddins, Digital image processing using MATLAB, vol. Gatesmark Publishing Knoxville , 2009 .

[4]  Hasan Koyuncu,et al.  Elimination of white Gaussian noise in arterial phase CT images to bring adrenal tumours into the forefront , 2017, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[5]  Karolin Baecker,et al.  Two Dimensional Signal And Image Processing , 2016 .

[6]  Hasan Koyuncu,et al.  Optic Disc Segmentation with Kapur-ScPSO Based Cascade Multithresholding , 2016, IWBBIO.

[7]  S. Edward Rajan,et al.  Computerized screening of diabetic retinopathy employing blood vessel segmentation in retinal images , 2014 .

[8]  Polina Golland,et al.  Contour-Driven Atlas-Based Segmentation. , 2015, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[9]  Granino A. Korn,et al.  Mathematical handbook for scientists and engineers. Definitions, theorems, and formulas for reference and review , 1968 .

[10]  Yong Yang,et al.  Image Segmentation by Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Algorithm with a Novel Penalty Term , 2007, Comput. Artif. Intell..

[11]  Stephen M. Moore,et al.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[12]  Georg Fuchs,et al.  Pixel-Level Deep Segmentation: Artificial Intelligence Quantifies Muscle on Computed Tomography for Body Morphometric Analysis , 2017, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[13]  D. L. Kirch,et al.  Abdominal organ segmentation using texture transforms and a Hopfield neural network , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Landmarking and segmentation of computed tomographic images of pediatric patients with neuroblastoma , 2009, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[15]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[16]  D. Lim Automated Segmentation of Soft tissue in Abdominal CT scans , 2009 .

[17]  Hasan Koyuncu,et al.  A hybrid tool on denoising and enhancement of abdominal CT images before organ & tumour segmentation , 2017, 2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Electronics and Nanotechnology (ELNANO).

[18]  Mohammad Sadegh Helfroush,et al.  Hierarchical classification of normal, fatty and heterogeneous liver diseases from ultrasound images using serial and parallel feature fusion , 2016 .

[19]  Bennett A Landman,et al.  Efficient multi-atlas abdominal segmentation on clinically acquired CT with SIMPLE context learning , 2015, Medical Image Anal..

[20]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Digital image processing using MATLAB , 2006 .

[21]  Tzong-Jer Chen,et al.  Fuzzy c-means clustering with spatial information for image segmentation , 2006, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[22]  B. S. Saini,et al.  Computer aided diagnosis system for abdomen diseases in computed tomography images , 2016 .

[23]  Bennett A Landman,et al.  Abdomen and spinal cord segmentation with augmented active shape models , 2016, Journal of medical imaging.

[24]  Hocine Cherifi,et al.  Accuracy Measures for the Comparison of Classifiers , 2012, ICIT 2012.