Frontiers in Geomorphometry and Earth Surface Dynamics: Possibilities, Limitations and Perspectives

Abstract. Geomorphometry, the science of quantitative land-surface analysis, has become a flourishing interdisciplinary subject, with applications in numerous fields. The interdisciplinarity of geomorphometry is its greatest strength and also one of its major challenges. Gaps are still present between the process focussed fields (e.g. soil science, glaciology, volcanology) and the technical domain (such as computer science, statistics …) where approaches and theories are developed. Thus, interesting geomorphometric applications struggle to jump between process-specific disciplines, but also struggle to take advantage of advances in computer science and technology. This special issue is therefore focused on facilitating cross-fertilization between disciplines, and highlighting novel technical developments and innovative applications of geomorphometry to various Earth-surface processes. The issue collects a variety of contributions which fall into two main categories: Perspectives and Research, further divided into “Research and innovative techniques” and “Research and innovative applications”. It showcases potentially exciting developments and tools which are the building blocks for the next step-change in the field.

[1]  Richard J. Pike,et al.  Geomorphometry -diversity in quantitative surface analysis , 2000 .

[2]  Paul E. Bigelow,et al.  Delineating incised stream sediment sources within a San Francisco Baytributary basin , 2016 .

[3]  Andrew P. Valentine,et al.  An introduction to learning algorithms and potential applications in geomorphometry and Earth surface dynamics , 2016 .

[4]  Mark A. Fonstad,et al.  Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement , 2013 .

[5]  M. Jaboyedoff,et al.  Headwater sediment dynamics in debrisflow catchment: implication of debrissupply using high resolution topographicsurveys , 2016 .

[6]  G. Pasternack,et al.  Analyzing bed and width oscillations in a self-maintained gravel-cobble bedded river using geomorphic covariance structures , 2016 .

[7]  Stuart W. D. Grieve,et al.  A nondimensional framework for exploring the relief structure of landscapes , 2016 .

[8]  M. Jaboyedoff,et al.  Headwater sediment dynamics in a debris flow catchment constrained by high-resolution topographic surveys , 2016 .

[9]  K. Stüwe,et al.  Tectonic geomorphology at small catchment sizes – extensions of the stream-power approach and the χ method , 2015 .

[10]  P. Tarolli,et al.  Analysis of glacial and periglacial processes using structure from motion , 2015 .

[11]  Carlos Castillo,et al.  Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry - merits, limits and developments , 2016 .

[12]  G. Sofia,et al.  Perspective – synthetic DEMs: a vital underpinning for the quantitative future of landform analysis? , 2015 .

[13]  Carlos Castillo,et al.  Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry – merits, limits and developments of a promising tool for geoscientists , 2015 .

[14]  Ángel M. Felicísimo,et al.  Parametric statistical method for error detection in digital elevation models , 1994 .

[15]  Mark W. Smith,et al.  Structure from motion photogrammetry in physical geography , 2016 .

[16]  J. Malet,et al.  Detection of seasonal erosion processes at the scale of an elementary black marl gully from time series of Hi-Resolution DEMs , 2015 .

[17]  P. Burrough,et al.  Principles of geographical information systems , 1998 .

[18]  M. Westoby,et al.  Inter-annual surface evolution of an Antarctic blue-ice moraine , 2016 .

[19]  L. Sklar,et al.  Catchment power and the joint distribution of elevation and travel distanceto the outlet , 2016 .

[20]  P. Tarolli,et al.  Human topographic signatures and derived geomorphic processes across landscapes , 2016 .

[21]  Natan Micheletti,et al.  Investigating the geomorphological potential of freely available and accessible structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry using a smartphone , 2015 .

[22]  I. Evans.  Geomorphometry and landform mapping: What is a landform? , 2012 .

[23]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[24]  G. Miliaresis,et al.  Quantification of Terrain Processes , 2008 .

[25]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Error Propagation in Environmental Modelling with GIS , 1998 .

[26]  R. Gloaguen,et al.  Geomorphic analysis of transient landscapes in the Sierra Madre de Chiapas and Maya Mountains (northern Central America): implications for the North American–Caribbean–Cocos plate boundary , 2015 .

[27]  A. Wickert.  Reconstruction of North American drainage basins and river discharge since the Last Glacial Maximum , 2016 .

[28]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  Suitability of ground-based SfM–MVS for monitoring glacial and periglacial processes , 2016 .

[29]  P. Tarolli.  High-resolution topography for understanding Earth surface processes: Opportunities and challenges , 2014 .

[30]  S. Manson.  Review of Principles of Geographic Information Systems: Spatial Information Systems and Geostatistics , 1999 .

[31]  John Woodward,et al.  Interannual surface evolution of an Antarctic blue-ice moraine using multi-temporal DEMs , 2015 .

[32]  S. Trevisani,et al.  Topography-based flow-directional roughness: potential and challenges , 2015 .