The aim of the study was to delineate the most optimal preservation conditions for small bowel grafts. Established preservation solutions such as EuroCollins, University of Wisconsin, histidine-tryptophane-ketoglutarate-Brettschneider, phosphate-buffered sucrose (PBS 140), and 3 new solutions--extracellular fluid (ECF), lactobionate fructose, and a modified lactobionate fructose solution--were compared with saline to determine the most optimal solution for the intestine. Recipient survival, standard histology, and glutaminase activity were used to assess the degree of injury encountered after 12 hr of preservation followed by transplantation. To evaluate the various preservation conditions, ECF was used at pH 6.8 (original ECF). Grafts were preserved most optimally when a vascular washout after the cold storage period was omitted and when topical rewarming of the graft with 37 degrees C saline before reperfusion was performed. Graft survival was not significantly different after preservation with any solution tested (50-83%). Highest graft survival (83%) was achieved with lactobionate fructose and PBS140. Histologic evaluation 20 min after reperfusion revealed minor differences between most groups; a slight advantage was observed for PBS140-preserved grafts. Mucosal glutaminase activity of PBS140-preserved grafts was significantly higher 20 min after reperfusion compared with any other solution evaluated, indicating a superior graft function. These data indicate that different preservation conditions have a great impact on postoperative graft survival and that PBS140 might be preferable to any of the other preservation solutions tested.