Technical and economical assessment of a multipurpose electric vehicle for farmers

Abstract The RAMseS project, under the European Commission's 6th Framework Program, is dedicated to the construction and test of low-power operations based on photovoltaic power and a multipurpose electric vehicle. In the present study, the life-cycle costs and economical indices for the vehicle during its life span were assessed, compared to those of a standard internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV). The results indicated that the life-cycle costs for the RAMseS vehicle and the ICEV are the same for a fuel unit price of 1.8 €/L. Also, the levelized cost of energy (LCE) for the RAMseS vehicle, was found to be 2.13 €/kWh, while RAMseS LCE, without EV taken into account, was shown to be 0.62 €/kWh. The RAMseS payback period (PBP) without EV taken into account was calculated to be 9 years if the value of the produced energy becomes at least 0.35 €/kWh. Vehicles that use PV systems as their power source, such as RAMseS, will be economically effective for fuel costs higher than 1.8 €/L, but considering the environmental benefits that are provided in terms of external costs, they can be considered profitable even at lower fuel costs.

[1]  Sunita Kolhe,et al.  Economic viability of stand-alone solar photovoltaic system in comparison with diesel-powered system for India , 2002 .

[2]  Ali Naci Celik,et al.  Present status of photovoltaic energy in Turkey and life cycle techno-economic analysis of a grid-connected photovoltaic-house , 2006 .

[3]  S. M. Shaahid,et al.  Technical and economic assessment of grid-independent hybrid photovoltaic-diesel-battery power systems for commercial loads in desert environments , 2007 .

[4]  Shahnawaz Ahmed,et al.  On the policy of photovoltaic and diesel generation mix for an off-grid site: east malaysian perspectives , 2003 .

[5]  Donnell Hunt,et al.  Farm Power And Machinery Management , 1983 .

[6]  Hossein Mobli,et al.  Environmental assessment of RAMseS multipurpose electric vehicle compared to a conventional combustion engine vehicle , 2009 .

[7]  Kamel Khouzam Technical and economic assessment of utility interactive PV systems for domestic applications in South East Queensland , 1999 .

[8]  R. K. Mazumder,et al.  Economic evaluation of a stand-alone residential photovoltaic power system in Bangladesh , 2000 .

[9]  Mourad Haddadi,et al.  Assessment of a photovoltaic pumping system in the areas of the Algerian Sahara , 2009 .

[10]  A. Louche,et al.  Technical and economic assessment of hybrid photovoltaic/wind system with battery storage in Corsica island , 2008 .

[11]  O. U. Oparaku,et al.  Rural area power supply in Nigeria: A cost comparison of the photovoltaic, diesel/gasoline generator and grid utility options , 2003 .

[12]  A. D. Papatsoris,et al.  The economics of photovoltaic stand-alone residential households: A case study for various European and Mediterranean locations , 2000 .

[13]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Economic and environmental comparison of conventional, hybrid, electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles , 2006 .

[14]  Kamel Khouzam Technical and economic assessment of utility interactive PV systems for domestic applications in south east Queensland , 2000, 2000 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting (Cat. No.00CH37134).

[15]  P. K Koner,et al.  A comparative life cycle energy cost analysis of photovoltaic and fuel generator for load shedding application , 2000 .

[16]  G. C. Bakos,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of a stand-alone PV/hybrid installation for low-cost electrification of a tourist resort in Greece , 2002 .

[17]  R. Dufo-López,et al.  Economical and environmental analysis of grid connected photovoltaic systems in Spain , 2006 .

[18]  S. C. Mullick,et al.  Photovoltaic projects for decentralized power supply in India: A financial evaluation , 2006 .