Creativity of Participants in Crowdsourcing Communities: The Effects of Promotion Focus and Extrinsic Motivation

Organizations can tap the wisdom of the crowd through digital platforms of crowdsourcing for ideation. However, we have limited understanding of factors affecting the innovativeness of ideas and solutions submitted by individual participants. Drawing upon self-determination theory and regulatory focus theory, we investigate how participants' regulatory focus and extrinsic motivation aroused by incentivizing mechanisms affect their creativity in crowdsourcing communities. Based on the data collected from 164 participants in a crowdsourcing platform, we find that promotion focus positively influences participants' creativity, and different types of extrinsic motivation have differential effects. Although external, identified, and integrated motivation positively affect participants' creativity, introjected motivation is not significantly related to participants' creativity. In addition, external and identified motivation strengthen the relationship between promotion focus and creativity. The theoretical contributions and managerial implications of this study are discussed.

[1]  E. Higgins.  Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational Principle , 1998 .

[2]  E. Higgins.  Making a good decision: value from fit. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[3]  J. Förster,et al.  GLOMOsys: A Systems Account of Global Versus Local Processing , 2010 .

[4]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[6]  G. Graen,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF LEADERSHIP AND EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: THE RELEVANCE OF TRAITS AND RELATIONSHIPS , 1999 .

[7]  Luca de Alfaro,et al.  A content-driven reputation system for the wikipedia , 2007, WWW '07.

[8]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Crowd Work , 2016, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[10]  Zhijian Cui,et al.  Scoring vs. Ranking: An Experimental Study of Idea Evaluation Processes , 2018, Production and Operations Management.

[11]  R. Friedman,et al.  The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Mihaela van der Schaar,et al.  Reputation-based incentive protocols in crowdsourcing applications , 2011, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[13]  Dahui Li,et al.  Task Design, Motivation, and Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[14]  J. Füller,et al.  Brand Community Members as a Source of Innovation , 2008 .

[15]  Gilad Chen,et al.  A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self-regulation, and performance. , 2006 .

[16]  Russell E. Johnson,et al.  Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: a review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Matthijs Baas,et al.  Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: toward a dual pathway to creativity model. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Lydia B. Chilton,et al.  The labor economics of paid crowdsourcing , 2010, EC '10.

[19]  James M. Bloodgood,et al.  Crowdsourcing: Useful for Problem Solving, But What About Value Capture? , 2013 .

[20]  Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara,et al.  Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition , 2012, J. Inf. Sci..

[21]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations : Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making , 1997 .

[22]  S. Ohlsson,et al.  Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving , 1999 .

[23]  Matthijs Baas,et al.  The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence , 2010 .

[24]  Yi Xu,et al.  Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Jian Cai.  Knowledge Management Within Collaboration Processes: A Perspective Modeling and Analyzing Methodology , 2006, J. Database Manag..

[26]  E. Higgins.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[27]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Jing Zhou,et al.  A CROSS-LEVEL PERSPECTIVE ON EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: GOAL ORIENTATION, TEAM LEARNING BEHAVIOR, AND INDIVIDUAL CREATIVITY , 2009 .

[29]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Enhancing the Motivational Affordance of Information Systems: The Effects of Real-Time Performance Feedback and Goal Setting in Group Collaboration Environments , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Kevin M. Brooks,et al.  Thoughts beyond words : When language overshadows insight , 1993 .

[31]  Giles Hirst,et al.  Relationships between leader and follower organizational identification and implications for follower attitudes and behaviour , 2007 .

[32]  N. Liberman,et al.  Distinguishing Gains from Nonlosses and Losses from Nongains: A Regulatory Focus Perspective on Hedonic Intensity , 2000 .

[33]  Roman Lukyanenko,et al.  Beyond Micro-Tasks: Research Opportunities in Observational Crowdsourcing , 2018, J. Database Manag..

[34]  Karim R Lakhani,et al.  Using the crowd as an innovation partner. , 2013, Harvard business review.

[35]  Fabio Nonino,et al.  Open innovation web-based platforms: The impact of different forms of motivation on collaboration , 2012 .

[36]  Chuan-Hoo Tan,et al.  Inducing Intrinsic Motivation to Explore the Enterprise System: The Supremacy of Organizational Levers , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[37]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Does reward increase or decrease creativity , 1994 .

[38]  Ping Zhang,et al.  The Effects of Extrinsic Motivations and Satisfaction in Open Source Software Development , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Yu Wang,et al.  A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of Feedback in Ideation Contests , 2019, Production and Operations Management.

[40]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[41]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Everyone has creative potential. , 2004 .

[42]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[43]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The New World Order , 2014, Restoring the Global Judiciary.

[44]  Barry L. Bayus,et al.  Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[45]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[46]  Daren C. Brabham.  MOVING THE CROWD AT THREADLESS , 2010 .

[47]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[48]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[49]  Liu-Qin Yang,et al.  Commitment and Motivation at Work: the Relevance of Employee Identity and Regulatory Focus , 2010 .

[50]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[51]  Milan Vojnovic,et al.  Crowdsourcing and all-pay auctions , 2009, EC '09.

[52]  Abraham Carmeli,et al.  Linking Meaningfulness in the Workplace to Employee Creativity: The Intervening Role of Organizational Identification and Positive Psychological Experiences , 2009 .

[53]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  Different Roles, Different Strokes: Organizing Virtual Customer Environments to Promote Two Types of Customer Contributions , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[54]  S. Nambisan,et al.  Virtual Customer Environments: Testing a Model of Voluntary Participation in Value Co‐creation Activities , 2009 .

[55]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Incremental effects of reward on creativity. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[56]  Simon Taggar,et al.  Group Composition, Creative Synergy, and Group Performance , 2001 .

[57]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Crowdsourcing with All-Pay Auctions: A Field Experiment on Taskcn , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[58]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[59]  Juan Feng,et al.  Multiple‐Winner Award Rules in Online Procurement Auctions , 2019, Production and Operations Management.

[60]  D. Ingledew,et al.  A graded conceptualisation of self-determination in the regulation of exercise behaviour: Development of a measure using confirmatory factor analytic procedures , 1997 .

[61]  Daniel M. Eveleth,et al.  Foci And Bases Of Employee Commitment: Implications For Job Performance , 1996 .

[62]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software 'Apps' Developers and Patterns of Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[63]  Nikolaus Franke,et al.  "Does This Sound Like a Fair Deal?": Antecedents and Consequences of Fairness Expectations in the Individual's Decision to Participate in Firm Innovation , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[64]  T. M. Amabile,et al.  The Work Preference Inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[66]  E. A. Locke,et al.  What Should we do About Motivation Theory? Six Recommendations for the Twenty-First Century , 2004 .

[67]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[68]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  Successive Open Innovation Contests and Incentives: Winner‐Take‐All or Multiple Prizes? , 2018 .

[69]  Thomas Lee Rodgers,et al.  Identifying Quality, Novel, and Creative Ideas: Constructs and Scales for Idea Evaluation , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[70]  M. Hossain,et al.  Users' motivation to participate in online crowdsourcing platforms , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Innovation Management and Technology Research.

[71]  Daren C. Brabham.  Moving the crowd at iStockphoto: The composition of the crowd and motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application , 2008, First Monday.

[72]  Kelly L. Haws,et al.  An Assessment of Chronic Regulatory Focus Measures , 2009 .

[73]  S. Stryker,et al.  Identity theory: Developments and extensions. , 1987 .

[74]  S. Lyubomirsky,et al.  The Benefits of Frequent Positive Affect: Does Happiness Lead to Success? , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[75]  Yaping Gong,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Team Goal Orientation, Information Exchange, and Creativity , 2013 .

[76]  E. Higgins,et al.  Principles of Judging Valence: What Makes Events Positive or Negative? , 1996 .

[77]  Chen Zhang,et al.  Research Note - Continued Participation in Online Innovation Communities: Does Community Response Matter Equally for Everyone? , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[78]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Exploring online social behavior in crowdsourcing communities: A relationship management perspective , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[79]  Ning Li,et al.  The Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior: The Role of Personality, Higher-Order Goals, and Job Characteristics , 2012 .

[80]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Crowdsourcing As a Solution to Distant Search , 2012 .

[81]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[82]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[83]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error , 1981 .

[84]  Gerald Häubl,et al.  When Social Media Can Be Bad for You: Community Feedback Stifles Consumer Creativity and Reduces Satisfaction with Self-Designed Products , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[85]  J. Förster,et al.  The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition. , 2002 .

[86]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Does Collaboration among Participants Lead to Better Ideas in IT-Based Idea Competitions? An Empirical Investigation , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[87]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace , 1993 .

[88]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Towards an Information Systems Perspective and Research Agenda on Crowdsourcing for Innovation , 2013, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[89]  Feng Xu,et al.  The Differential Effects of Interpersonal Justice and Injustice on Computer Abuse: A Regulatory Focus Theory Perspective , 2019, J. Database Manag..

[90]  L. Jeppesen,et al.  Unpaid Crowd Complementors: The Platform Network Effect Mirage , 2014 .

[91]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[92]  Weiguo Fan,et al.  Crowd characteristics and crowd wisdom: Evidence from an online investment community , 2019, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[93]  Nick Turner,et al.  Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[94]  E. Deci,et al.  Self‐determination theory and work motivation , 2005 .

[95]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas , 2007 .

[96]  Param Vir Singh,et al.  Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas Under Consumer Learning , 2014, Manag. Sci..