Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness

A principle of perceptual organization, calleduniform connectedness (UC), is described, and a theoretical approach to perceptual organization is proposed in which this principle plays a fundamental role. The principle of UC states that closed regions of homogeneous properties—such as lightness, chromatic color, texture, and so forth—tend to be perceived initially as single units. We demonstrate its effects and show that they occur even when opposed by powerful grouping principles such as proximity and similarity. We argue that UC cannot be reduced to such grouping principles, because it is not a form of grouping at all. We then propose a theoretical framework within which UC accounts for the initial (orentry level) organization of the visual field into primitive units. Classical principles of grouping operate after UC, creating superordinate units consisting of two or more basic-level units. Parsing processes also operate after UC, dividing basic-level units into subordinate parts. UC in the retinal image is proposed to be a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for unit formation, since connected elements on the retina that are perceived to lie in separate depth planes fail to be perceived as units. This fact, together with other evidence that the Gestalt principles of grouping are based onperceived (rather than retinal) relations, suggests that the organization of visual stimulation into UC objects is ultimately achieved within a relatively late, postconstancy representation of environmental surfaces. The implications of this possibility are discussed in light of present theories of visual perception.

[1]  M. Wertheimer Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .

[2]  W. Köhler An Aspect of Gestalt Psychology , 1925 .

[3]  R. Leeper A Study of a Neglected Portion of the Field of Learning—the Development of Sensory Organization , 1935 .

[4]  J. Gibson The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[5]  H. Wallach,et al.  The memory effect of visual perception of three-dimensional form. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  J. Krauskopf Effect of retinal image stabilization on the appearance of heterochromatic targets. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  I. Rock,et al.  GROUPING BASED ON PHENOMENAL PROXIMITY. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  J. Beck Perceptual Grouping Produced by Changes in Orientation and Shape , 1966, Science.

[9]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Patrick Henry Winston,et al.  Learning structural descriptions from examples , 1970 .

[11]  E Goldmeier,et al.  Similarity in visually perceived forms. , 1972, Psychological issues.

[12]  B Julesz,et al.  Experiments in the visual perception of texture. , 1975, Scientific American.

[13]  J. Beck,et al.  The relation between similarity grouping and perceptual constancy. , 1975, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  D Marr,et al.  Cooperative computation of stereo disparity. , 1976, Science.

[15]  Walter Gerbino,et al.  Convexity and Symmetry in Figure-Ground Organization , 1976 .

[16]  E. Land The retinex theory of color vision. , 1977, Scientific American.

[17]  S. Palmer Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  H. Barrow,et al.  RECOVERING INTRINSIC SCENE CHARACTERISTICS FROM IMAGES , 1978 .

[19]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[20]  Allen R. Hanson,et al.  Computer Vision Systems , 1978 .

[21]  A. Gilchrist The perception of surface blacks and whites. , 1979, Scientific American.

[22]  D Marr,et al.  A computational theory of human stereo vision. , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[23]  R. Hummel,et al.  Toward a low-level description of dot clusters: Labeling edge, interior, and noise points , 1979 .

[24]  Kent A. Stevens,et al.  Surface perception from local analysis of texture and contour , 1980 .

[25]  S. Howard Bartley,et al.  Introduction to Perception , 1980 .

[26]  D Marr,et al.  Theory of edge detection , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[27]  Andrew P. Witkin,et al.  Recovering Surface Shape and Orientation from Texture , 1981, Artif. Intell..

[28]  B. Julesz Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[29]  S. Palmer,et al.  Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. , 1982 .

[30]  S. Palmer,et al.  Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  I. Rock The Logic of Perception , 1983 .

[32]  E. Spelke,et al.  Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[34]  J. M. Rubin,et al.  Color Vision: Representing Material Categories , 1984 .

[35]  S. Ullman Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.

[36]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. , 1985 .

[37]  Irving Biederman,et al.  Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[38]  R Kimchi,et al.  Separability and integrality of global and local levels of hierarchical patterns. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. , 1985, Psychological review.

[40]  M. Lévesque Perception , 1986, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[41]  Harry G. Barrow,et al.  Computational approaches to vision , 1986 .

[42]  Irvin Rock,et al.  The description and analysis of object and event perception. , 1986 .

[43]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Properties, Parts, and Objects , 1986 .

[44]  J. P. Cavanagh,et al.  Reconstructing the third dimension: Interactions between color, texture, motion, binocular disparity, and shape , 1987, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[45]  DH Hubel,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[46]  Jacob Beck,et al.  Spatial frequency channels and perceptual grouping in texture segregation , 1987, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[47]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Pathways in early vision , 1988 .

[48]  A. Gilchrist Lightness contrast and failures of constancy: A common explanation , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  J. Cutting,et al.  Minimodularity and the perception of layout. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  P Perona,et al.  Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[51]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[52]  P. Kellman,et al.  A theory of visual interpolation in object perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[53]  J. Bergen,et al.  Computational Modeling of Visual Texture Segregation , 1991 .

[54]  M. Peterson,et al.  Shape recognition contributions to figure-ground reversal: which route counts? , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  Mary A. Peterson,et al.  The initial identification of figure-ground relationships: Contributions from shape recognition processes , 1991 .

[56]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  A Computational Framework for Determining Stereo Correspondence from a Set of Linear Spatial Filters , 1991, ECCV.

[57]  I. Rock,et al.  Perception without attention: Results of a new method , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[58]  S. Palmer,et al.  Grouping Based on Phenomenal Similarity of Achromatic Color , 1992, Perception.

[59]  I. Rock,et al.  Perceptual organization and attention , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[60]  S. Palmer Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[61]  Norma Graham,et al.  Nonlinear processes in spatial-frequency channel models of perceived texture segregation: Effects of sign and amount of contrast , 1992, Vision Research.

[62]  G. Kramer Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound by Albert Bregman (review) , 2016 .

[63]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Computational framework for determining stereo correspondence from a set of linear spatial filters , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..

[64]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Interactions between object and space systems revealed through neuropsychology , 1993 .

[65]  B. Gibson,et al.  Shape Recognition Inputs To Figure-Ground Organization in Three-Dimensional Displays , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[66]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Late influences on perceptual grouping: Amodal completion , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[67]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Perceptual Organization and Visual Recognition , 2012 .