THE RATIONALE FOR TREATING THE CHANGE IN GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE AS A CHANGE IN CONDUCTANCE.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Wilcott Rc. Silverman-powell index of sweating vs. skin conductance and a humidity index of surface moisture. , 1959 .
[2] Wilcott Rc. Correlation of skin resistance and potential. , 1958 .
[3] C. Darrow,et al. Uniphasic and diphasic wave forms of the skin potential response. , 1957, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.
[4] J. C. Gilchrist,et al. A comparison of two indices of palmar sweating. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.
[5] W. Lobitz,et al. Chemistry of Palmar Sweat: Preliminary Report: Apparatus and Technics1 , 1945 .
[6] T. W. Forbes. SKIN POTENTIAL AND IMPEDANCE RESPONSES WITH RECURRING SHOCK STIMULATION , 1936 .
[7] C. Darrow. Quantitative Records of Cutaneous Secretory Reactions , 1934 .
[8] C. Darrow. The Relation of the Galvanic Skin Reflex Recovery Curve to Reactivity, Resistance Level, and Perspiration , 1932 .
[9] C. Darrow. Uniform Current for Continuous, Standard Unit Resistance Records , 1932 .
[10] Chester W. Darrow,et al. Sensory, secretory, and electrical changes in the skin following bodily excitation. , 1927 .
[11] J. Bradford. The Electrical Phenomena accompanying the excitation of so‐called Secretory and Trophic Nerve Fibres in the Salivary Glands of the Dog and Cat , 1887, The Journal of physiology.
[12] T. W. Forbes,et al. Correlation of the Response Potentials of the Skin with “Exciting” and Non-“Exciting” Stimuli , 1936 .